WMT vs. SLV
WMT (Walmart Inc.) is a stock, while SLV (iShares Silver Trust) is Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. Over the past 10 years, WMT returned 19.62%/yr vs 14.08%/yr for SLV. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
WMT vs. SLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WMT achieves a 7.98% return, which is significantly higher than SLV's -4.41% return. Over the past 10 years, WMT has outperformed SLV with an annualized return of 19.62%, while SLV has yielded a comparatively lower 14.08% annualized return.
WMT
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- -8.13%
- YTD
- 7.98%
- 6M
- 6.15%
- 1Y
- 23.97%
- 3Y*
- 34.37%
- 5Y*
- 22.47%
- 10Y*
- 19.62%
SLV
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- -15.66%
- YTD
- -4.41%
- 6M
- 16.83%
- 1Y
- 88.38%
- 3Y*
- 40.36%
- 5Y*
- 19.02%
- 10Y*
- 14.08%
WMT vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WMT Walmart Inc. | 7.98% | 24.49% | 73.99% | 12.88% | -0.46% | 1.97% | 23.32% | 30.16% | -3.43% | 46.56% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | -4.41% | 144.66% | 20.89% | -1.09% | 2.37% | -12.45% | 47.30% | 14.88% | -9.19% | 5.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between WMT and SLV is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2006 | 0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WMT vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank
WMT
SLV
WMT vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Walmart Inc. (WMT) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WMT | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.30 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.53 | 2.09 | -0.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.02 | 4.40 | +0.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WMT | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.02 | 1.50 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.04 | 0.53 | +0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 | 0.44 | +0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.23 | +0.40 |
Drawdowns
WMT vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WMT drawdown since its inception was -77.14%, roughly equal to the maximum SLV drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WMT and SLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WMT | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.14% | -76.28% | -0.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.75% | -42.45% | +26.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.93% | -42.45% | +20.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.74% | -42.45% | +16.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.74% | -42.81% | +17.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.71% | -41.69% | +30.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.63% | -44.67% | +30.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.79% | 20.15% | -15.36% |
Volatility
WMT vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Walmart Inc. (WMT) is 10.26%, while iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a volatility of 16.89%. This indicates that WMT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WMT | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.26% | 16.89% | -6.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.59% | 58.88% | -40.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.72% | 59.53% | -35.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.68% | 36.33% | -14.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.73% | 31.92% | -10.19% |
Dividends
WMT vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison
WMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, while SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLV iShares Silver Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WMT Walmart Inc. | 0.81% | 0.84% | 0.92% | 1.45% | 1.58% | 1.52% | 1.50% | 1.78% | 2.23% | 2.07% | 2.89% | 3.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WMT and SLV have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SLV has higher volatility (16.89%) compared to WMT (10.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WMT dropped -77.14% vs SLV's -76.28%.
SLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WMT and SLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer