PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WMFFX vs. BEXIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WMFFX vs. BEXIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class F-2 (WMFFX) and Baron Emerging Markets Fund (BEXIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WMFFX achieves a 4.46% return, which is significantly lower than BEXIX's 13.02% return. Over the past 10 years, WMFFX has outperformed BEXIX with an annualized return of 12.74%, while BEXIX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.83% annualized return.


WMFFX

1D
-1.27%
1M
0.30%
YTD
4.46%
6M
4.89%
1Y
15.75%
3Y*
17.84%
5Y*
11.59%
10Y*
12.74%

BEXIX

1D
-6.41%
1M
-6.16%
YTD
13.02%
6M
14.47%
1Y
28.92%
3Y*
17.88%
5Y*
2.50%
10Y*
7.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WMFFX vs. BEXIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WMFFX
Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class F-2
4.46%17.42%19.24%16.96%-8.27%28.71%7.89%25.03%-5.98%20.23%
BEXIX
Baron Emerging Markets Fund
13.02%30.11%7.91%8.29%-25.82%-6.06%29.71%18.85%-18.48%40.63%

Correlation

The correlation between WMFFX and BEXIX is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2011

0.61

The correlation between WMFFX and BEXIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WMFFX vs. BEXIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WMFFX
WMFFX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
WMFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WMFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
WMFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
WMFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
WMFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

BEXIX
BEXIX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
BEXIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BEXIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
BEXIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
BEXIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
BEXIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WMFFX vs. BEXIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class F-2 (WMFFX) and Baron Emerging Markets Fund (BEXIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WMFFXBEXIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.28

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.97

2.23

-0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.50

7.61

+0.89

WMFFX vs. BEXIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WMFFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is comparable to the BEXIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WMFFX and BEXIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WMFFXBEXIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.58

1.46

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

0.14

+0.68

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

0.43

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.35

+0.25

Drawdowns

WMFFX vs. BEXIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WMFFX drawdown since its inception was -47.21%, roughly equal to the maximum BEXIX drawdown of -45.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WMFFX and BEXIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WMFFXBEXIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.21%

-45.58%

-1.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.36%

-13.32%

+4.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.64%

-16.63%

+1.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.53%

-41.88%

+23.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.63%

-45.58%

+10.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.41%

-7.80%

+6.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.36%

-13.77%

+8.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.93%

3.89%

-1.96%

Volatility

WMFFX vs. BEXIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class F-2 (WMFFX) is 2.54%, while Baron Emerging Markets Fund (BEXIX) has a volatility of 9.65%. This indicates that WMFFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BEXIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WMFFXBEXIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.54%

9.65%

-7.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.92%

17.48%

-9.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.40%

20.39%

-9.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.11%

17.70%

-3.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.33%

18.09%

-1.76%

WMFFX vs. BEXIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WMFFX has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is lower than BEXIX's 1.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

WMFFX vs. BEXIX - Dividend Comparison

WMFFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.87%, more than BEXIX's 1.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BEXIX
Baron Emerging Markets Fund
1.81%2.04%0.81%0.69%0.00%1.88%0.35%0.46%0.49%0.45%0.76%0.39%
WMFFX
Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class F-2
9.87%10.28%10.27%5.92%6.53%6.24%3.26%6.33%4.59%7.43%6.56%6.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


WMFFX and BEXIX have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BEXIX has higher volatility (9.65%) compared to WMFFX (2.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WMFFX dropped -47.21% vs BEXIX's -45.58%.

WMFFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WMFFX and BEXIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer