WM vs. XHYD
WM (Waste Management, Inc.) is a stock, while XHYD (BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclicals Sector ETF) is High Yield Bonds fund tracking the ICE Diversified US Cash Pay High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclical. Over the past 3 years, WM returned 11.63%/yr vs 7.51%/yr for XHYD. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
WM vs. XHYD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WM achieves a -0.81% return, which is significantly lower than XHYD's 0.44% return.
WM
- 1D
- -1.93%
- 1M
- 0.79%
- YTD
- -0.81%
- 6M
- 3.67%
- 1Y
- -7.08%
- 3Y*
- 11.63%
- 5Y*
- 10.86%
- 10Y*
- 15.25%
XHYD
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.75%
- YTD
- 0.44%
- 6M
- 0.97%
- 1Y
- 5.22%
- 3Y*
- 7.51%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WM vs. XHYD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WM Waste Management, Inc. | -0.81% | 10.50% | 14.28% | 16.20% | 11.42% |
XHYD BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclicals Sector ETF | 0.44% | 8.33% | 6.29% | 11.75% | -5.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between WM and XHYD is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2022 | 0.19 |
The correlation between WM and XHYD shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WM vs. XHYD — Risk / Return Rank
WM
XHYD
WM vs. XHYD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Waste Management, Inc. (WM) and BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclicals Sector ETF (XHYD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WM | XHYD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.32 | -0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.43 | 2.36 | -2.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.95 | 10.53 | -11.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WM | XHYD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.38 | 1.55 | -1.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.67 | -0.31 |
Drawdowns
WM vs. XHYD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WM drawdown since its inception was -77.85%, which is greater than XHYD's maximum drawdown of -11.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WM and XHYD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WM | XHYD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.85% | -11.02% | -66.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.72% | -2.49% | -14.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.14% | -3.70% | -14.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.14% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.59% | -1.08% | -10.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.69% | -2.04% | -15.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.49% | 0.56% | +6.93% |
Volatility
WM vs. XHYD - Volatility Comparison
Waste Management, Inc. (WM) has a higher volatility of 5.91% compared to BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclicals Sector ETF (XHYD) at 1.83%. This indicates that WM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XHYD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WM | XHYD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.91% | 1.83% | +4.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.69% | 3.28% | +10.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.73% | 3.79% | +14.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.55% | 7.15% | +11.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.51% | 7.15% | +12.36% |
Dividends
WM vs. XHYD - Dividend Comparison
WM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, while XHYD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WM Waste Management, Inc. | 1.64% | 1.50% | 1.49% | 1.56% | 1.66% | 1.38% | 1.85% | 1.80% | 2.09% | 1.97% | 2.31% | 2.89% |
XHYD BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclicals Sector ETF | 5.31% | 5.83% | 6.32% | 5.80% | 5.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WM and XHYD have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WM has higher volatility (5.91%) compared to XHYD (1.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WM dropped -77.85% vs XHYD's -11.02%.
XHYD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs -0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WM and XHYD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer