PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
WLDS.L vs. PLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

WLDS.L vs. PLD

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

WLDS.L (iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF) is Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Small Cap Inde, while PLD (Prologis, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, WLDS.L returned 7.61%/yr vs 7.08%/yr for PLD. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

WLDS.L vs. PLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF (WLDS.L) and Prologis, Inc. (PLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

WLDS.L is traded in GBP, while PLD is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PLD values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WLDS.L achieves a 13.04% return, which is significantly lower than PLD's 13.84% return.

WLDS.L

1D
-0.13%
1M
1.73%
YTD
13.04%
6M
13.37%
1Y
30.87%
3Y*
14.30%
5Y*
7.61%
10Y*
—

PLD

1D
-1.25%
1M
1.23%
YTD
13.84%
6M
14.32%
1Y
37.66%
3Y*
6.87%
5Y*
7.08%
10Y*
14.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WLDS.L vs. PLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
WLDS.L
iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF		13.04%11.75%8.63%11.26%-8.89%16.71%12.54%20.41%-31.05%
PLD
Prologis, Inc.		13.84%16.17%-16.69%15.50%-23.16%73.96%11.37%49.94%9.34%

Correlation

The correlation between WLDS.L and PLD is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2018

0.30

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF

Prologis, Inc.

Often compared with WLDS.L:
WLDS.L vs. WOSC.LWLDS.L vs. AVSG.LWLDS.L vs. URTHWLDS.L vs. EQGB.LWLDS.L vs. EXUS.LWLDS.L vs. VUAA.LWLDS.L vs. XRSG.L
Often compared with PLD:
PLD vs. VNQPLD vs. STAGPLD vs. PSAPLD vs. VOOPLD vs. EXRPLD vs. CUBEPLD vs. ILPT

Return for Risk

WLDS.L vs. PLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
WLDS.L
WLDS.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
WLDS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WLDS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
WLDS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
WLDS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
WLDS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
PLD
PLD Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
PLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLD Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
PLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WLDS.L vs. PLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF (WLDS.L) and Prologis, Inc. (PLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

WLDS.LPLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.42
1.84

+0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.41
2.64

+0.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.32

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.91

4.13

-0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.75

12.87

+1.88

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WLDS.L vs. PLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WLDS.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is higher than the PLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WLDS.L and PLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

WLDS.LPLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.42

1.84

+0.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

0.28

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.56

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.27

-0.04

Drawdowns

WLDS.L vs. PLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WLDS.L drawdown since its inception was -43.18%, smaller than the maximum PLD drawdown of -77.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WLDS.L and PLD.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

WLDS.LPLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.18%

-77.91%

+34.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.86%

-9.17%

+1.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.53%

-31.40%

+9.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.53%

-44.68%

+23.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-44.68%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.42%

-12.86%

+11.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.31%

-18.89%

+6.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.09%

2.93%

-0.84%

Volatility

WLDS.L vs. PLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF (WLDS.L) is 3.57%, while Prologis, Inc. (PLD) has a volatility of 5.40%. This indicates that WLDS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

WLDS.LPLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.57%

5.40%

-1.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.48%

13.99%

-4.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.74%

20.58%

-7.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.28%

25.76%

-5.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.46%

26.78%

-4.32%

Dividends

WLDS.L vs. PLD - Dividend Comparison

WLDS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.87%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PLD
Prologis, Inc.		2.87%3.16%3.63%2.61%2.80%1.50%2.33%2.38%3.27%2.73%3.18%3.54%
WLDS.L
iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

WLDS.L and PLD have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WLDS.L and PLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer