PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WDC vs. IBM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

WDC vs. IBM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Western Digital Corporation (WDC) and International Business Machines Corporation (IBM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WDC achieves a 206.10% return, which is significantly higher than IBM's -3.95% return. Over the past 10 years, WDC has outperformed IBM with an annualized return of 32.86%, while IBM has yielded a comparatively lower 11.34% annualized return.


WDC

1D
2.97%
1M
9.81%
YTD
206.10%
6M
210.59%
1Y
852.85%
3Y*
160.14%
5Y*
56.39%
10Y*
32.86%

IBM

1D
-1.41%
1M
22.22%
YTD
-3.95%
6M
-7.98%
1Y
7.12%
3Y*
31.74%
5Y*
18.84%
10Y*
11.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WDC vs. IBM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WDC
Western Digital Corporation
206.10%283.68%13.86%65.99%-51.62%17.73%-10.89%77.14%-51.90%19.83%
IBM
International Business Machines Corporation
-3.95%38.23%39.27%21.85%10.64%16.65%-1.16%23.58%-22.56%-3.99%

Correlation

The correlation between WDC and IBM is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 1987

0.30

Over the past year, the correlation between WDC and IBM has dropped to 0.06 - well below their long-term average of 0.30, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

EPS

WDC:

$23.29

IBM:

$11.32

PE Ratio

WDC:

22.63

IBM:

24.81

PEG Ratio

WDC:

0.53

IBM:

0.30

PS Ratio

WDC:

12.46

IBM:

3.87

Total Revenue (TTM)

WDC:

$11.78B

IBM:

$68.91B

Gross Profit (TTM)

WDC:

$5.35B

IBM:

$40.64B

EBITDA (TTM)

WDC:

$10.88B

IBM:

$15.71B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WDC vs. IBM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WDC
WDC Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
WDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
WDC Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
WDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
WDC Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

IBM
IBM Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
IBM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBM Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
IBM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBM Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WDC vs. IBM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Western Digital Corporation (WDC) and International Business Machines Corporation (IBM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WDCIBMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+13.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+6.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.94

1.07

+0.86

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

41.84

0.23

+41.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

146.77

0.50

+146.27

WDC vs. IBM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WDC Sharpe Ratio is 13.33, which is higher than the IBM Sharpe Ratio of 0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WDC and IBM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WDCIBMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.33

0.18

+13.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.17

0.70

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

0.43

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.20

0.29

-0.09

Drawdowns

WDC vs. IBM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WDC drawdown since its inception was -96.20%, which is greater than IBM's maximum drawdown of -69.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WDC and IBM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WDCIBMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.20%

-69.40%

-26.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.59%

-30.96%

+10.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-49.65%

-30.96%

-18.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-59.68%

-30.96%

-28.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-70.49%

-40.59%

-29.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.28%

-14.70%

+3.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-52.09%

-20.12%

-31.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.86%

14.23%

-8.37%

Volatility

WDC vs. IBM - Volatility Comparison

Western Digital Corporation (WDC) and International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) have volatilities of 20.86% and 21.84%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WDCIBMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.86%

21.84%

-0.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

52.91%

34.54%

+18.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

64.74%

39.53%

+25.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

48.62%

27.15%

+21.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.52%

26.59%

+21.93%

Dividends

WDC vs. IBM - Dividend Comparison

WDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, less than IBM's 2.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IBM
International Business Machines Corporation
2.40%2.27%3.03%4.05%4.68%4.74%5.17%4.80%5.46%3.85%3.31%3.63%
WDC
Western Digital Corporation
0.09%0.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.81%2.36%5.41%2.51%2.94%3.33%

Financials

WDC vs. IBM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Western Digital Corporation and International Business Machines Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B20222023202420252026
3.34B
15.92B
(WDC) Total Revenue
(IBM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

WDC vs. IBM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Western Digital Corporation and International Business Machines Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
50.2%
56.2%
Portfolio components
WDC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Western Digital Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.68B and revenue of 3.34B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.2%.

IBM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, International Business Machines Corporation reported a gross profit of 8.95B and revenue of 15.92B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.2%.

WDC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Western Digital Corporation reported an operating income of 1.14B and revenue of 3.34B, resulting in an operating margin of 34.0%.

IBM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, International Business Machines Corporation reported an operating income of 1.22B and revenue of 15.92B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.6%.

WDC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Western Digital Corporation reported a net income of 3.21B and revenue of 3.34B, resulting in a net margin of 96.0%.

IBM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, International Business Machines Corporation reported a net income of 1.22B and revenue of 15.92B, resulting in a net margin of 7.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


WDC and IBM have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IBM has higher volatility (21.84%) compared to WDC (20.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WDC dropped -96.20% vs IBM's -69.40%.

WDC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (13.33 vs 0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WDC and IBM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer