PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VYM vs. XYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VYM vs. XYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VYM achieves a 10.82% return, which is significantly higher than XYLD's 4.47% return. Over the past 10 years, VYM has outperformed XYLD with an annualized return of 11.70%, while XYLD has yielded a comparatively lower 8.23% annualized return.


VYM

1D
-0.08%
1M
1.71%
YTD
10.82%
6M
10.58%
1Y
24.30%
3Y*
17.89%
5Y*
11.33%
10Y*
11.70%

XYLD

1D
0.27%
1M
0.88%
YTD
4.47%
6M
5.83%
1Y
16.60%
3Y*
10.96%
5Y*
7.62%
10Y*
8.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VYM vs. XYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
10.82%15.42%17.60%6.57%-0.43%26.20%1.15%24.06%-5.92%16.42%
XYLD
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
4.47%8.02%19.49%11.10%-12.05%19.59%-0.56%21.41%-6.09%16.49%

Correlation

The correlation between VYM and XYLD is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2013

0.71

The correlation between VYM and XYLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

VYM vs. XYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VYM
XYLD

Financial Services

20.5%
11.8%

Technology

17.7%
35.6%

Healthcare

12.2%
8.5%

Industrials

12.1%
8.3%

Energy

9.8%
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

8.1%
4.9%

Consumer Cyclical

6.7%
10.2%

Utilities

5.7%
2.3%

Communication Services

3.5%
11.2%

Basic Materials

3.5%
1.8%

Real Estate

0.0%
1.9%

Financial Services

VYM
20.5%
XYLD
11.8%

Technology

VYM
17.7%
XYLD
35.6%

Healthcare

VYM
12.2%
XYLD
8.5%

Industrials

VYM
12.1%
XYLD
8.3%

Energy

VYM
9.8%
XYLD
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

VYM
8.1%
XYLD
4.9%

Consumer Cyclical

VYM
6.7%
XYLD
10.2%

Utilities

VYM
5.7%
XYLD
2.3%

Communication Services

VYM
3.5%
XYLD
11.2%

Basic Materials

VYM
3.5%
XYLD
1.8%

Real Estate

VYM
0.0%
XYLD
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VYM vs. XYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VYM
VYM Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
VYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
VYM Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
VYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
VYM Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

XYLD
XYLD Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
XYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
XYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
XYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
XYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VYM vs. XYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VYMXYLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.59

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.65

3.15

+0.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.64

16.73

-3.08

VYM vs. XYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VYM Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is comparable to the XYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VYM and XYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VYMXYLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.36

2.53

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

0.68

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

0.58

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.60

-0.09

Drawdowns

VYM vs. XYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VYM drawdown since its inception was -56.98%, which is greater than XYLD's maximum drawdown of -33.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VYM and XYLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VYMXYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.98%

-33.46%

-23.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.69%

-5.29%

-1.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.46%

-15.53%

+1.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.84%

-18.66%

+2.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.21%

-33.46%

-1.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.89%

-0.64%

-1.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.19%

-3.72%

-3.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.79%

0.99%

+0.80%

Volatility

VYM vs. XYLD - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) has a higher volatility of 2.82% compared to Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) at 1.33%. This indicates that VYM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VYMXYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.82%

1.33%

+1.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.73%

5.46%

+2.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.35%

6.60%

+3.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.98%

11.23%

+2.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.35%

14.21%

+2.14%

VYM vs. XYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

VYM has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than XYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

VYM vs. XYLD - Dividend Comparison

VYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%, less than XYLD's 10.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
2.22%2.44%2.74%3.12%3.01%2.76%3.18%3.03%3.40%2.80%2.91%3.22%
XYLD
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
10.57%10.51%11.54%10.51%13.43%9.07%7.93%5.76%7.12%5.18%3.23%4.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


VYM and XYLD have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VYM has higher volatility (2.82%) compared to XYLD (1.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VYM dropped -56.98% vs XYLD's -33.46%.

On 10-year performance, VYM leads with 11.70% vs 8.23% for XYLD. On fees, VYM is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, XYLD has been the lower-risk option at 1.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VYM has performed better with a 11.70% return vs 8.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VYM is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for XYLD.

XYLD has the higher dividend yield at 10.57%, compared with 2.22% for VYM.

VYM is categorized as Dividend, while XYLD is Derivative Income. VYM tracks FTSE High Dividend Yield Index, while XYLD tracks Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for VYM and 0.60% for XYLD.

XYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 2.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VYM and XYLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer