PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VYM vs. VAPX.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VYM vs. VAPX.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing (VAPX.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VYM is traded in USD, while VAPX.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VAPX.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VYM achieves a 10.82% return, which is significantly lower than VAPX.L's 39.58% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VYM having a 11.70% annualized return and VAPX.L not far ahead at 11.74%.


VYM

1D
-0.08%
1M
1.71%
YTD
10.82%
6M
10.58%
1Y
24.30%
3Y*
17.89%
5Y*
11.33%
10Y*
11.70%

VAPX.L

1D
0.35%
1M
-2.11%
YTD
39.58%
6M
44.97%
1Y
70.32%
3Y*
25.08%
5Y*
10.60%
10Y*
11.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VYM vs. VAPX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
10.82%15.42%17.60%6.57%-0.43%26.20%1.15%24.06%-5.92%16.42%
VAPX.L
Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing
39.58%41.25%-5.11%9.37%-12.16%0.91%18.84%17.37%-14.69%31.84%

Correlation

The correlation between VYM and VAPX.L is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2013

0.49

VYM vs. VAPX.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VYM
VAPX.L

Financial Services

20.5%
25.3%

Technology

17.7%
30.2%

Healthcare

12.2%
3.3%

Industrials

12.1%
12.5%

Energy

9.8%
2.3%

Consumer Defensive

8.1%
2.5%

Consumer Cyclical

6.7%
5.3%

Utilities

5.7%
2.0%

Communication Services

3.5%
2.4%

Basic Materials

3.5%
9.5%

Real Estate

0.0%
4.9%

Financial Services

VYM
20.5%
VAPX.L
25.3%

Technology

VYM
17.7%
VAPX.L
30.2%

Healthcare

VYM
12.2%
VAPX.L
3.3%

Industrials

VYM
12.1%
VAPX.L
12.5%

Energy

VYM
9.8%
VAPX.L
2.3%

Consumer Defensive

VYM
8.1%
VAPX.L
2.5%

Consumer Cyclical

VYM
6.7%
VAPX.L
5.3%

Utilities

VYM
5.7%
VAPX.L
2.0%

Communication Services

VYM
3.5%
VAPX.L
2.4%

Basic Materials

VYM
3.5%
VAPX.L
9.5%

Real Estate

VYM
0.0%
VAPX.L
4.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VYM vs. VAPX.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VYM
VYM Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
VYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
VYM Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
VYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
VYM Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

VAPX.L
VAPX.L Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
VAPX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VAPX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
VAPX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
VAPX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
VAPX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VYM vs. VAPX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing (VAPX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VYMVAPX.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.54

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.65

4.63

-0.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.64

17.93

-4.29

VYM vs. VAPX.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VYM Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is comparable to the VAPX.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VYM and VAPX.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VYMVAPX.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.36

3.02

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

0.55

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

0.61

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.43

+0.07

Drawdowns

VYM vs. VAPX.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VYM drawdown since its inception was -56.98%, which is greater than VAPX.L's maximum drawdown of -38.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VYM and VAPX.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VYMVAPX.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.98%

-38.96%

-18.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.69%

-15.09%

+8.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.46%

-20.38%

+5.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.84%

-31.90%

+16.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.21%

-38.96%

+3.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.89%

-9.65%

+7.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.19%

-10.17%

+2.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.79%

3.91%

-2.12%

Volatility

VYM vs. VAPX.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is 2.82%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing (VAPX.L) has a volatility of 12.47%. This indicates that VYM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VAPX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VYMVAPX.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.82%

12.47%

-9.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.73%

20.85%

-13.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.35%

23.25%

-12.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.98%

19.18%

-5.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.35%

19.32%

-2.97%

VYM vs. VAPX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VYM has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than VAPX.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VYM vs. VAPX.L - Dividend Comparison

VYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%, more than VAPX.L's 1.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VAPX.L
Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing
1.91%2.70%3.47%3.53%4.32%3.51%2.08%3.39%3.52%3.10%2.71%3.49%
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
2.22%2.44%2.74%3.12%3.01%2.76%3.18%3.03%3.40%2.80%2.91%3.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


VYM and VAPX.L have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VYM is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VYM is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for VAPX.L.

VYM is categorized as Dividend, while VAPX.L is Asia Pacific Equities. VYM tracks FTSE High Dividend Yield Index, while VAPX.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Pac Ex JPN NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for VYM and 0.15% for VAPX.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VYM and VAPX.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer