PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VYM vs. SCHP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VYM vs. SCHP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) and Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VYM achieves a 10.82% return, which is significantly higher than SCHP's 0.96% return. Over the past 10 years, VYM has outperformed SCHP with an annualized return of 11.70%, while SCHP has yielded a comparatively lower 2.53% annualized return.


VYM

1D
-0.08%
1M
1.71%
YTD
10.82%
6M
10.58%
1Y
24.30%
3Y*
17.89%
5Y*
11.33%
10Y*
11.70%

SCHP

1D
-0.19%
1M
-0.89%
YTD
0.96%
6M
0.95%
1Y
4.80%
3Y*
3.84%
5Y*
1.02%
10Y*
2.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VYM vs. SCHP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
10.82%15.42%17.60%6.57%-0.43%26.20%1.15%24.06%-5.92%16.42%
SCHP
Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF
0.96%6.76%1.95%3.91%-12.02%5.87%10.86%8.52%-1.78%3.02%

Correlation

The correlation between VYM and SCHP is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2010

-0.08

The correlation between VYM and SCHP shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (all time) to 0.22 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VYM vs. SCHP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VYM
SCHP

Financial Services

20.5%
0.0%

Technology

17.7%

-

Healthcare

12.2%

-

Industrials

12.1%

-

Energy

9.8%

-

Consumer Defensive

8.1%

-

Consumer Cyclical

6.7%
100.0%

Utilities

5.7%

-

Communication Services

3.5%

-

Basic Materials

3.5%

-

Real Estate

0.0%

-

Financial Services

VYM
20.5%
SCHP
0.0%

Technology

VYM
17.7%
SCHP

-

Healthcare

VYM
12.2%
SCHP

-

Industrials

VYM
12.1%
SCHP

-

Energy

VYM
9.8%
SCHP

-

Consumer Defensive

VYM
8.1%
SCHP

-

Consumer Cyclical

VYM
6.7%
SCHP
100.0%

Utilities

VYM
5.7%
SCHP

-

Communication Services

VYM
3.5%
SCHP

-

Basic Materials

VYM
3.5%
SCHP

-

Real Estate

VYM
0.0%
SCHP

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VYM vs. SCHP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VYM
VYM Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
VYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
VYM Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
VYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
VYM Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHP
SCHP Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
SCHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHP Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHP Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VYM vs. SCHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) and Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VYMSCHPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.26

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.65

2.50

+1.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.64

7.59

+6.06

VYM vs. SCHP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VYM Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is higher than the SCHP Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VYM and SCHP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VYMSCHPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.36

1.47

+0.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

0.17

+0.65

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

0.45

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.50

+0.01

Drawdowns

VYM vs. SCHP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VYM drawdown since its inception was -56.98%, which is greater than SCHP's maximum drawdown of -14.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VYM and SCHP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VYMSCHPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.98%

-14.26%

-42.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.69%

-1.93%

-4.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.46%

-4.48%

-9.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.84%

-14.26%

-1.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.21%

-14.26%

-20.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.89%

-0.89%

-1.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.19%

-3.93%

-3.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.79%

0.63%

+1.16%

Volatility

VYM vs. SCHP - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) has a higher volatility of 2.82% compared to Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP) at 1.00%. This indicates that VYM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VYMSCHPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.82%

1.00%

+1.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.73%

2.24%

+5.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.35%

3.29%

+7.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.98%

6.12%

+7.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.35%

5.59%

+10.76%

VYM vs. SCHP - Expense Ratio Comparison

VYM has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHP's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VYM vs. SCHP - Dividend Comparison

VYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%, less than SCHP's 4.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHP
Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF
4.01%4.06%2.99%3.02%7.19%4.39%1.11%2.02%2.26%1.90%1.38%0.28%
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
2.22%2.44%2.74%3.12%3.01%2.76%3.18%3.03%3.40%2.80%2.91%3.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


VYM and SCHP have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VYM has higher volatility (2.82%) compared to SCHP (1.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VYM dropped -56.98% vs SCHP's -14.26%.

On 10-year performance, VYM leads with 11.70% vs 2.53% for SCHP. On fees, SCHP is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHP has been the lower-risk option at 1.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VYM has performed better with a 11.70% return vs 2.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHP is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.04% for VYM.

SCHP has the higher dividend yield at 4.01%, compared with 2.22% for VYM.

VYM is categorized as Dividend, while SCHP is Inflation-Protected Bonds. VYM tracks FTSE High Dividend Yield Index, while SCHP tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Inflation-Linked Bond Index (Series-L). They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for VYM and 0.03% for SCHP.

VYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VYM and SCHP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer