PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VYM vs. BTAL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VYM vs. BTAL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) and AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund (BTAL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VYM achieves a 10.82% return, which is significantly higher than BTAL's -18.69% return. Over the past 10 years, VYM has outperformed BTAL with an annualized return of 11.70%, while BTAL has yielded a comparatively lower -4.76% annualized return.


VYM

1D
-0.08%
1M
1.71%
YTD
10.82%
6M
10.58%
1Y
24.30%
3Y*
17.89%
5Y*
11.33%
10Y*
11.70%

BTAL

1D
-2.26%
1M
-2.66%
YTD
-18.69%
6M
-16.94%
1Y
-35.41%
3Y*
-12.18%
5Y*
-4.53%
10Y*
-4.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VYM vs. BTAL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
10.82%15.42%17.60%6.57%-0.43%26.20%1.15%24.06%-5.92%16.42%
BTAL
AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund
-18.69%-20.17%12.83%-15.11%20.48%-6.81%-13.86%1.07%15.13%-2.13%

Correlation

The correlation between VYM and BTAL is -0.47, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.46

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2011

-0.45

VYM vs. BTAL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VYM
BTAL

Financial Services

20.5%
14.9%

Technology

17.7%
19.5%

Healthcare

12.2%
10.2%

Industrials

12.1%
13.7%

Energy

9.8%
4.4%

Consumer Defensive

8.1%
5.6%

Consumer Cyclical

6.7%
12.8%

Utilities

5.7%
5.2%

Communication Services

3.5%
3.4%

Basic Materials

3.5%
4.0%

Real Estate

0.0%
6.2%

Financial Services

VYM
20.5%
BTAL
14.9%

Technology

VYM
17.7%
BTAL
19.5%

Healthcare

VYM
12.2%
BTAL
10.2%

Industrials

VYM
12.1%
BTAL
13.7%

Energy

VYM
9.8%
BTAL
4.4%

Consumer Defensive

VYM
8.1%
BTAL
5.6%

Consumer Cyclical

VYM
6.7%
BTAL
12.8%

Utilities

VYM
5.7%
BTAL
5.2%

Communication Services

VYM
3.5%
BTAL
3.4%

Basic Materials

VYM
3.5%
BTAL
4.0%

Real Estate

VYM
0.0%
BTAL
6.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VYM vs. BTAL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VYM
VYM Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
VYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
VYM Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
VYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
VYM Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

BTAL
BTAL Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
BTAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTAL Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
BTAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTAL Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VYM vs. BTAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) and AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund (BTAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VYMBTALDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+5.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

0.74

+0.68

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.65

-0.95

+4.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.64

-1.62

+15.26

VYM vs. BTAL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VYM Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is higher than the BTAL Sharpe Ratio of -1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VYM and BTAL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VYMBTALDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.36

-1.61

+3.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

-0.24

+1.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

-0.28

+0.99

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

-0.24

+0.74

Drawdowns

VYM vs. BTAL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VYM drawdown since its inception was -56.98%, which is greater than BTAL's maximum drawdown of -50.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VYM and BTAL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VYMBTALDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.98%

-50.28%

-6.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.69%

-37.50%

+30.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.46%

-45.16%

+30.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.84%

-45.16%

+29.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.21%

-50.28%

+15.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.89%

-49.32%

+47.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.19%

-21.98%

+14.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.79%

21.90%

-20.11%

Volatility

VYM vs. BTAL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is 2.82%, while AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund (BTAL) has a volatility of 7.68%. This indicates that VYM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VYMBTALDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.82%

7.68%

-4.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.73%

15.98%

-8.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.35%

22.07%

-11.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.98%

18.86%

-4.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.35%

17.29%

-0.94%

VYM vs. BTAL - Expense Ratio Comparison

VYM has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than BTAL's 2.11% expense ratio.


Dividends

VYM vs. BTAL - Dividend Comparison

VYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%, less than BTAL's 3.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BTAL
AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund
3.06%2.49%3.49%6.14%1.01%0.00%0.00%0.88%0.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
2.22%2.44%2.74%3.12%3.01%2.76%3.18%3.03%3.40%2.80%2.91%3.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


VYM and BTAL have a correlation of -0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BTAL has higher volatility (7.68%) compared to VYM (2.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VYM dropped -56.98% vs BTAL's -50.28%.

On 10-year performance, VYM leads with 11.70% vs -4.76% for BTAL. On fees, VYM is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VYM has been the lower-risk option at 2.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VYM has performed better with a 11.70% return vs -4.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VYM is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 2.11% for BTAL.

BTAL has the higher dividend yield at 3.06%, compared with 2.22% for VYM.

VYM is categorized as Dividend, while BTAL is Long-Short. VYM tracks FTSE High Dividend Yield Index, while BTAL tracks Dow Jones U.S. Thematic Market Neutral Anti-Beta Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and AGF. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for VYM and 2.11% for BTAL.

VYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs -1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VYM and BTAL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer