PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VXUS vs. MINV.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VXUS vs. MINV.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) and iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (MINV.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VXUS is traded in USD, while MINV.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the MINV.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VXUS achieves a 11.12% return, which is significantly higher than MINV.L's 0.42% return. Over the past 10 years, VXUS has outperformed MINV.L with an annualized return of 9.68%, while MINV.L has yielded a comparatively lower 7.08% annualized return.


VXUS

1D
0.86%
1M
-1.98%
YTD
11.12%
6M
13.49%
1Y
27.05%
3Y*
17.97%
5Y*
7.95%
10Y*
9.68%

MINV.L

1D
-0.09%
1M
0.69%
YTD
0.42%
6M
1.74%
1Y
1.41%
3Y*
9.22%
5Y*
5.00%
10Y*
7.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VXUS vs. MINV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VXUS
Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
11.12%32.35%5.08%15.86%-16.08%8.98%10.66%21.75%-14.43%27.46%
MINV.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF
0.42%11.17%10.98%6.85%-9.59%14.93%1.99%23.61%-2.67%17.19%

Correlation

The correlation between VXUS and MINV.L is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2012

0.53

The correlation between VXUS and MINV.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (1 year) to 0.53 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VXUS vs. MINV.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VXUS
MINV.L

Financial Services

22.3%
14.0%

Technology

18.1%
21.6%

Industrials

16.1%
9.2%

Consumer Cyclical

8.4%
5.3%

Basic Materials

7.6%
1.1%

Healthcare

7.1%
13.7%

Energy

5.2%
4.1%

Consumer Defensive

5.0%
10.9%

Communication Services

4.4%
11.9%

Utilities

3.2%
7.7%

Real Estate

2.6%
0.7%

Financial Services

VXUS
22.3%
MINV.L
14.0%

Technology

VXUS
18.1%
MINV.L
21.6%

Industrials

VXUS
16.1%
MINV.L
9.2%

Consumer Cyclical

VXUS
8.4%
MINV.L
5.3%

Basic Materials

VXUS
7.6%
MINV.L
1.1%

Healthcare

VXUS
7.1%
MINV.L
13.7%

Energy

VXUS
5.2%
MINV.L
4.1%

Consumer Defensive

VXUS
5.0%
MINV.L
10.9%

Communication Services

VXUS
4.4%
MINV.L
11.9%

Utilities

VXUS
3.2%
MINV.L
7.7%

Real Estate

VXUS
2.6%
MINV.L
0.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VXUS vs. MINV.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VXUS
VXUS Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
VXUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VXUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
VXUS Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
VXUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
VXUS Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

MINV.L
MINV.L Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
MINV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MINV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
MINV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
MINV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
MINV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VXUS vs. MINV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) and iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (MINV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VXUSMINV.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.04

+0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.41

0.23

+2.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.34

0.57

+8.77

VXUS vs. MINV.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VXUS Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is higher than the MINV.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VXUS and MINV.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VXUSMINV.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.73

0.18

+1.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.28

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

0.46

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.26

+0.12

Drawdowns

VXUS vs. MINV.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VXUS drawdown since its inception was -35.97%, smaller than the maximum MINV.L drawdown of -39.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VXUS and MINV.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VXUSMINV.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.97%

-39.54%

+3.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.27%

-6.06%

-5.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.58%

-19.10%

+5.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.44%

-19.14%

-10.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.97%

-28.90%

-7.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.70%

-4.25%

+0.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.21%

-9.78%

+1.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.90%

2.46%

+0.44%

Volatility

VXUS vs. MINV.L - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) has a higher volatility of 6.03% compared to iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (MINV.L) at 1.74%. This indicates that VXUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MINV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VXUSMINV.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.03%

1.74%

+4.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.60%

5.71%

+7.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.71%

7.97%

+7.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.13%

17.59%

-1.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.19%

15.54%

+1.65%

VXUS vs. MINV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VXUS has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than MINV.L's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

VXUS vs. MINV.L - Dividend Comparison

VXUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.73%, while MINV.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MINV.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VXUS
Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
2.73%3.18%3.37%3.24%3.09%3.10%2.14%3.06%3.18%2.73%2.93%2.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


VXUS and MINV.L have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VXUS is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VXUS is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for MINV.L.

VXUS tracks FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index, while MINV.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VXUS and 0.35% for MINV.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VXUS and MINV.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer