PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VWRL.L vs. VAGS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VWRL.L vs. VAGS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Distributing (VWRL.L) and Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating (VAGS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VWRL.L achieves a 10.38% return, which is significantly higher than VAGS.L's -0.15% return.


VWRL.L

1D
-0.21%
1M
2.33%
YTD
10.38%
6M
10.56%
1Y
27.51%
3Y*
17.75%
5Y*
12.03%
10Y*
13.37%

VAGS.L

1D
0.04%
1M
-0.35%
YTD
-0.15%
6M
0.58%
1Y
3.12%
3Y*
5.82%
5Y*
1.40%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VWRL.L vs. VAGS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VWRL.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Distributing
10.38%13.99%19.60%15.61%-8.44%20.05%12.13%6.09%
VAGS.L
Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating
-0.15%6.58%5.57%8.56%-12.52%-1.30%6.71%1.98%

Correlation

The correlation between VWRL.L and VAGS.L is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2019

-0.02

The correlation between VWRL.L and VAGS.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (all time) to 0.28 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VWRL.L vs. VAGS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VWRL.L
VAGS.L

Technology

29.5%

-

Financial Services

16.2%
100.0%

Industrials

10.4%

-

Consumer Cyclical

9.2%

-

Communication Services

8.7%

-

Healthcare

8.0%

-

Consumer Defensive

5.0%

-

Energy

4.2%

-

Basic Materials

3.8%

-

Utilities

2.9%

-

Real Estate

1.8%

-

Technology

VWRL.L
29.5%
VAGS.L

-

Financial Services

VWRL.L
16.2%
VAGS.L
100.0%

Industrials

VWRL.L
10.4%
VAGS.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

VWRL.L
9.2%
VAGS.L

-

Communication Services

VWRL.L
8.7%
VAGS.L

-

Healthcare

VWRL.L
8.0%
VAGS.L

-

Consumer Defensive

VWRL.L
5.0%
VAGS.L

-

Energy

VWRL.L
4.2%
VAGS.L

-

Basic Materials

VWRL.L
3.8%
VAGS.L

-

Utilities

VWRL.L
2.9%
VAGS.L

-

Real Estate

VWRL.L
1.8%
VAGS.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VWRL.L vs. VAGS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VWRL.L
VWRL.L Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
VWRL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWRL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWRL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
VWRL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWRL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

VAGS.L
VAGS.L Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
VAGS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VAGS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
VAGS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
VAGS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
VAGS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VWRL.L vs. VAGS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Distributing (VWRL.L) and Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating (VAGS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VWRL.LVAGS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.15

+0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.87

1.16

+2.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.69

3.36

+12.32

VWRL.L vs. VAGS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VWRL.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.63, which is higher than the VAGS.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VWRL.L and VAGS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VWRL.LVAGS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.63

0.88

+1.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

0.29

+0.65

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.93

0.43

+0.50

Drawdowns

VWRL.L vs. VAGS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VWRL.L drawdown since its inception was -24.99%, which is greater than VAGS.L's maximum drawdown of -16.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VWRL.L and VAGS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VWRL.LVAGS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.99%

-16.34%

-8.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.08%

-2.67%

-4.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.47%

-3.39%

-14.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.47%

-16.34%

-1.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.81%

-1.64%

-0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.32%

-4.12%

+0.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.75%

0.93%

+0.82%

Volatility

VWRL.L vs. VAGS.L - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Distributing (VWRL.L) has a higher volatility of 2.99% compared to Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating (VAGS.L) at 1.45%. This indicates that VWRL.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VAGS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VWRL.LVAGS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.99%

1.45%

+1.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.71%

2.79%

+4.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.43%

3.54%

+6.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.86%

4.91%

+7.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.25%

4.60%

+9.65%

VWRL.L vs. VAGS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VWRL.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than VAGS.L's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VWRL.L vs. VAGS.L - Dividend Comparison

VWRL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, while VAGS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VAGS.L
Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating
0.00%1.43%3.03%2.33%1.45%0.87%1.08%0.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VWRL.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Distributing
1.26%1.39%1.49%1.72%2.03%1.45%1.58%1.95%2.22%1.90%1.95%2.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VWRL.L and VAGS.L have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VAGS.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VAGS.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for VWRL.L.

VWRL.L is categorized as Global Equities, while VAGS.L is Global Bonds. VWRL.L tracks FTSE All-World Index, while VAGS.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg GBP. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for VWRL.L and 0.10% for VAGS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VWRL.L and VAGS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer