PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VWRL.L vs. FWRA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VWRL.L vs. FWRA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Distributing (VWRL.L) and Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (FWRA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VWRL.L is traded in GBP, while FWRA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FWRA.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with VWRL.L having a 10.38% return and FWRA.L slightly lower at 10.34%.


VWRL.L

1D
-0.21%
1M
2.33%
YTD
10.38%
6M
10.56%
1Y
27.51%
3Y*
17.75%
5Y*
12.03%
10Y*
13.37%

FWRA.L

1D
-0.46%
1M
2.39%
YTD
10.34%
6M
10.54%
1Y
27.62%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VWRL.L vs. FWRA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
VWRL.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Distributing
10.38%13.99%19.60%9.34%
FWRA.L
Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
10.34%13.69%20.10%9.85%

Correlation

The correlation between VWRL.L and FWRA.L is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2023

0.89

The correlation between VWRL.L and FWRA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

VWRL.L vs. FWRA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VWRL.L
FWRA.L

Technology

29.5%
29.1%

Financial Services

16.2%
16.4%

Industrials

10.4%
11.0%

Consumer Cyclical

9.2%
9.4%

Communication Services

8.7%
8.9%

Healthcare

8.0%
7.6%

Consumer Defensive

5.0%
5.0%

Energy

4.2%
4.3%

Basic Materials

3.8%
3.9%

Utilities

2.9%
2.6%

Real Estate

1.8%
1.9%

Technology

VWRL.L
29.5%
FWRA.L
29.1%

Financial Services

VWRL.L
16.2%
FWRA.L
16.4%

Industrials

VWRL.L
10.4%
FWRA.L
11.0%

Consumer Cyclical

VWRL.L
9.2%
FWRA.L
9.4%

Communication Services

VWRL.L
8.7%
FWRA.L
8.9%

Healthcare

VWRL.L
8.0%
FWRA.L
7.6%

Consumer Defensive

VWRL.L
5.0%
FWRA.L
5.0%

Energy

VWRL.L
4.2%
FWRA.L
4.3%

Basic Materials

VWRL.L
3.8%
FWRA.L
3.9%

Utilities

VWRL.L
2.9%
FWRA.L
2.6%

Real Estate

VWRL.L
1.8%
FWRA.L
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VWRL.L vs. FWRA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VWRL.L
VWRL.L Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
VWRL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWRL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWRL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
VWRL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWRL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

FWRA.L
FWRA.L Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FWRA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FWRA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
FWRA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
FWRA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
FWRA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VWRL.L vs. FWRA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Distributing (VWRL.L) and Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (FWRA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VWRL.LFWRA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.44

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.87

3.98

-0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.69

15.22

+0.47

VWRL.L vs. FWRA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VWRL.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.63, which is comparable to the FWRA.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VWRL.L and FWRA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VWRL.LFWRA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.63

2.32

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.93

1.43

-0.50

Drawdowns

VWRL.L vs. FWRA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VWRL.L drawdown since its inception was -24.99%, which is greater than FWRA.L's maximum drawdown of -17.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VWRL.L and FWRA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VWRL.LFWRA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.99%

-17.88%

-7.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.08%

-6.94%

-0.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.81%

-1.85%

+0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.32%

-2.06%

-1.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.75%

1.81%

-0.06%

Volatility

VWRL.L vs. FWRA.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Distributing (VWRL.L) is 2.99%, while Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (FWRA.L) has a volatility of 3.65%. This indicates that VWRL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FWRA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VWRL.LFWRA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.99%

3.65%

-0.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.71%

9.30%

-1.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.43%

11.92%

-1.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.86%

13.02%

-0.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.25%

13.02%

+1.23%

VWRL.L vs. FWRA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VWRL.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than FWRA.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VWRL.L vs. FWRA.L - Dividend Comparison

VWRL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, while FWRA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FWRA.L
Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VWRL.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Distributing
1.26%1.39%1.49%1.72%2.03%1.45%1.58%1.95%2.22%1.90%1.95%2.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VWRL.L and FWRA.L have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FWRA.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FWRA.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for VWRL.L.

Both ETFs track FTSE All-World Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for VWRL.L and 0.15% for FWRA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VWRL.L and FWRA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer