PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VWRD.L vs. EQGB.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VWRD.L vs. EQGB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWRD.L) and Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF GBP Hdg Acc (EQGB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VWRD.L is traded in USD, while EQGB.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the EQGB.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VWRD.L achieves a 9.34% return, which is significantly lower than EQGB.L's 14.54% return.


VWRD.L

1D
-0.50%
1M
0.14%
YTD
9.34%
6M
10.73%
1Y
25.69%
3Y*
20.06%
5Y*
10.76%
10Y*
12.55%

EQGB.L

1D
-0.34%
1M
-0.59%
YTD
14.54%
6M
14.93%
1Y
33.11%
3Y*
28.86%
5Y*
14.26%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VWRD.L vs. EQGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VWRD.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF
9.34%22.39%17.65%22.31%-18.19%18.52%16.13%25.67%-9.70%4.44%
EQGB.L
Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF GBP Hdg Acc
14.54%28.61%24.02%62.04%-42.01%26.53%49.89%47.53%-7.95%7.72%

Correlation

The correlation between VWRD.L and EQGB.L is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2017

0.85

The correlation between VWRD.L and EQGB.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

VWRD.L vs. EQGB.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VWRD.L
EQGB.L

Technology

30.2%
53.6%

Financial Services

16.1%
0.2%

Industrials

10.2%
3.1%

Consumer Cyclical

9.1%
12.2%

Communication Services

8.9%
15.8%

Healthcare

8.1%
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
7.7%

Energy

4.3%
0.6%

Basic Materials

3.6%
1.1%

Utilities

2.9%
1.4%

Real Estate

1.6%
0.1%

Technology

VWRD.L
30.2%
EQGB.L
53.6%

Financial Services

VWRD.L
16.1%
EQGB.L
0.2%

Industrials

VWRD.L
10.2%
EQGB.L
3.1%

Consumer Cyclical

VWRD.L
9.1%
EQGB.L
12.2%

Communication Services

VWRD.L
8.9%
EQGB.L
15.8%

Healthcare

VWRD.L
8.1%
EQGB.L
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

VWRD.L
4.9%
EQGB.L
7.7%

Energy

VWRD.L
4.3%
EQGB.L
0.6%

Basic Materials

VWRD.L
3.6%
EQGB.L
1.1%

Utilities

VWRD.L
2.9%
EQGB.L
1.4%

Real Estate

VWRD.L
1.6%
EQGB.L
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VWRD.L vs. EQGB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VWRD.L
VWRD.L Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VWRD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWRD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWRD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
VWRD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWRD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

EQGB.L
EQGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
EQGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
EQGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VWRD.L vs. EQGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWRD.L) and Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF GBP Hdg Acc (EQGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VWRD.LEQGB.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.30

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.91

2.20

+0.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.15

8.15

+4.00

VWRD.L vs. EQGB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VWRD.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is comparable to the EQGB.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VWRD.L and EQGB.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VWRD.LEQGB.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.05

1.77

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

0.58

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

0.80

-0.02

Drawdowns

VWRD.L vs. EQGB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VWRD.L drawdown since its inception was -33.83%, smaller than the maximum EQGB.L drawdown of -47.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VWRD.L and EQGB.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VWRD.LEQGB.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.83%

-47.56%

+13.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.80%

-14.96%

+6.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.25%

-22.21%

+5.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.02%

-47.56%

+21.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.82%

-4.48%

+1.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.51%

-9.51%

+5.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.11%

4.05%

-1.94%

Volatility

VWRD.L vs. EQGB.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWRD.L) is 3.95%, while Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF GBP Hdg Acc (EQGB.L) has a volatility of 6.24%. This indicates that VWRD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EQGB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VWRD.LEQGB.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.95%

6.24%

-2.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.95%

14.28%

-4.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.53%

18.66%

-6.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.34%

24.79%

-9.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.72%

24.75%

-9.03%

VWRD.L vs. EQGB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VWRD.L has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than EQGB.L's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

VWRD.L vs. EQGB.L - Dividend Comparison

VWRD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, while EQGB.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EQGB.L
Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF GBP Hdg Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%4.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VWRD.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF
1.26%1.38%1.52%1.69%2.05%1.48%1.47%1.88%2.29%1.82%2.04%2.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


VWRD.L and EQGB.L have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VWRD.L is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VWRD.L is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for EQGB.L.

VWRD.L is categorized as Global Equities, while EQGB.L is Nasdaq-100. VWRD.L tracks FTSE All-World Index, while EQGB.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for VWRD.L and 0.35% for EQGB.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VWRD.L and EQGB.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer