VWRA.L vs. DBC
VWRA.L (Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) and DBC (Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - VWRA.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE All-World Index, while DBC is a Commodities fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VWRA.L returned 10.76%/yr vs 12.01%/yr for DBC. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VWRA.L charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for DBC.
Performance
VWRA.L vs. DBC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VWRA.L achieves a 9.28% return, which is significantly lower than DBC's 31.80% return.
VWRA.L
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- 0.14%
- YTD
- 9.28%
- 6M
- 10.70%
- 1Y
- 25.68%
- 3Y*
- 20.08%
- 5Y*
- 10.76%
- 10Y*
- —
DBC
- 1D
- 0.82%
- 1M
- -2.74%
- YTD
- 31.80%
- 6M
- 32.21%
- 1Y
- 40.70%
- 3Y*
- 14.11%
- 5Y*
- 12.01%
- 10Y*
- 8.54%
VWRA.L vs. DBC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VWRA.L Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 9.28% | 22.45% | 17.65% | 22.28% | -18.11% | 18.46% | 16.19% | 7.42% |
DBC Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund | 31.80% | 8.10% | 2.18% | -6.19% | 19.34% | 41.36% | -7.84% | 4.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between VWRA.L and DBC is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2019 | 0.20 |
The correlation between VWRA.L and DBC shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VWRA.L vs. DBC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VWRA.L
DBC
Technology
-
Financial Services
Industrials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
VWRA.L
DBC
-
Financial Services
VWRA.L
DBC
Industrials
VWRA.L
DBC
-
Communication Services
VWRA.L
DBC
-
Consumer Cyclical
VWRA.L
DBC
-
Healthcare
VWRA.L
DBC
-
Consumer Defensive
VWRA.L
DBC
-
Energy
VWRA.L
DBC
-
Basic Materials
VWRA.L
DBC
-
Utilities
VWRA.L
DBC
-
Real Estate
VWRA.L
DBC
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VWRA.L vs. DBC — Risk / Return Rank
VWRA.L
DBC
VWRA.L vs. DBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (VWRA.L) and Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VWRA.L | DBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.38 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.91 | 5.27 | -2.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.14 | 12.03 | +0.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VWRA.L | DBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.05 | 2.17 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 | 0.63 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.76 | 0.11 | +0.65 |
Drawdowns
VWRA.L vs. DBC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VWRA.L drawdown since its inception was -33.62%, smaller than the maximum DBC drawdown of -76.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VWRA.L and DBC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VWRA.L | DBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.62% | -76.36% | +42.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.78% | -7.76% | -1.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.26% | -13.82% | -2.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.06% | -27.34% | +1.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.71% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.80% | -23.76% | +20.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.37% | -46.21% | +40.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.11% | 3.39% | -1.28% |
Volatility
VWRA.L vs. DBC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (VWRA.L) is 3.96%, while Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC) has a volatility of 6.20%. This indicates that VWRA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VWRA.L | DBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.96% | 6.20% | -2.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.93% | 16.02% | -6.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.51% | 18.91% | -6.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.35% | 19.20% | -3.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.24% | 17.82% | -0.58% |
VWRA.L vs. DBC - Expense Ratio Comparison
VWRA.L has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than DBC's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
VWRA.L vs. DBC - Dividend Comparison
VWRA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DBC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBC Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund | 2.53% | 3.33% | 5.22% | 4.94% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.59% | 1.30% |
VWRA.L Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VWRA.L and DBC have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VWRA.L is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VWRA.L is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DBC.
VWRA.L is categorized as Global Equities, while DBC is Commodities. VWRA.L tracks FTSE All-World Index, while DBC tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for VWRA.L and 0.85% for DBC.
Find the right allocation for VWRA.L and DBC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer