VWO vs. VHT
VWO (Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF) and VHT (Vanguard Health Care ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VWO is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the FTSE Emerging Index, while VHT is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Health Care 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VWO returned 8.60%/yr vs 9.66%/yr for VHT. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VWO charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VHT.
Performance
VWO vs. VHT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VWO achieves a 8.50% return, which is significantly higher than VHT's -1.21% return. Over the past 10 years, VWO has underperformed VHT with an annualized return of 8.60%, while VHT has yielded a comparatively higher 9.66% annualized return.
VWO
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- -3.65%
- YTD
- 8.50%
- 6M
- 9.73%
- 1Y
- 24.29%
- 3Y*
- 16.22%
- 5Y*
- 4.65%
- 10Y*
- 8.60%
VHT
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 5.33%
- YTD
- -1.21%
- 6M
- 0.70%
- 1Y
- 16.43%
- 3Y*
- 7.21%
- 5Y*
- 4.80%
- 10Y*
- 9.66%
VWO vs. VHT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VWO Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF | 8.50% | 25.60% | 10.59% | 9.25% | -17.98% | 1.26% | 15.17% | 20.75% | -14.76% | 31.49% |
VHT Vanguard Health Care ETF | -1.21% | 15.46% | 2.66% | 2.52% | -5.60% | 20.57% | 18.29% | 21.87% | 5.58% | 23.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between VWO and VHT is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2005 | 0.54 |
Over the past year, the correlation between VWO and VHT has dropped to 0.29 - well below their long-term average of 0.54, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
VWO vs. VHT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VWO
VHT
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
VWO
VHT
Financial Services
VWO
VHT
Consumer Cyclical
VWO
VHT
-
Industrials
VWO
VHT
Basic Materials
VWO
VHT
-
Communication Services
VWO
VHT
-
Energy
VWO
VHT
-
Healthcare
VWO
VHT
Consumer Defensive
VWO
VHT
-
Utilities
VWO
VHT
-
Real Estate
VWO
VHT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VWO vs. VHT — Risk / Return Rank
VWO
VHT
VWO vs. VHT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) and Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VWO | VHT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.20 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.18 | 1.59 | +0.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.79 | 3.95 | +3.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VWO | VHT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.49 | 1.13 | +0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | 0.32 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | 0.57 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.57 | -0.31 |
Drawdowns
VWO vs. VHT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VWO drawdown since its inception was -67.68%, which is greater than VHT's maximum drawdown of -39.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VWO and VHT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VWO | VHT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.68% | -39.12% | -28.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.17% | -10.40% | -0.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.37% | -16.91% | -0.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.60% | -17.71% | -14.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.39% | -28.85% | -7.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.67% | -4.34% | -0.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.81% | -5.99% | -9.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.12% | 4.17% | -1.05% |
Volatility
VWO vs. VHT - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) has a higher volatility of 6.29% compared to Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT) at 4.90%. This indicates that VWO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VHT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VWO | VHT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.29% | 4.90% | +1.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.80% | 10.45% | +3.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.37% | 14.64% | +1.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.45% | 15.02% | +2.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.23% | 16.97% | +2.26% |
VWO vs. VHT - Expense Ratio Comparison
VWO has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than VHT's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VWO vs. VHT - Dividend Comparison
VWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%, more than VHT's 1.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VHT Vanguard Health Care ETF | 1.66% | 1.61% | 1.53% | 1.36% | 1.33% | 1.14% | 1.21% | 1.89% | 1.38% | 1.31% | 1.45% | 1.22% |
VWO Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF | 2.49% | 2.79% | 3.20% | 3.52% | 4.11% | 2.63% | 1.91% | 3.23% | 2.88% | 2.30% | 2.52% | 3.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VWO and VHT have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VWO has higher volatility (6.29%) compared to VHT (4.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VWO dropped -67.68% vs VHT's -39.12%.
On 10-year performance, VHT leads with 9.66% vs 8.60% for VWO. On fees, VWO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, VHT has been the lower-risk option at 4.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VHT has performed better with a 9.66% return vs 8.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VWO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for VHT.
VWO has the higher dividend yield at 2.49%, compared with 1.66% for VHT.
VWO is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while VHT is Health & Biotech Equities. VWO tracks FTSE Emerging Index, while VHT tracks MSCI US Investable Market Health Care 25/50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for VWO and 0.09% for VHT.
VWO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VWO and VHT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer