VWO vs. VAW
VWO (Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF) and VAW (Vanguard Materials ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VWO is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the FTSE Emerging Index, while VAW is a Materials fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Materials 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VWO returned 8.60%/yr vs 9.87%/yr for VAW. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VWO charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for VAW.
Performance
VWO vs. VAW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VWO achieves a 8.50% return, which is significantly lower than VAW's 9.07% return. Over the past 10 years, VWO has underperformed VAW with an annualized return of 8.60%, while VAW has yielded a comparatively higher 9.87% annualized return.
VWO
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- -3.65%
- YTD
- 8.50%
- 6M
- 9.73%
- 1Y
- 24.29%
- 3Y*
- 16.22%
- 5Y*
- 4.65%
- 10Y*
- 8.60%
VAW
- 1D
- -1.01%
- 1M
- -3.30%
- YTD
- 9.07%
- 6M
- 14.24%
- 1Y
- 17.86%
- 3Y*
- 10.82%
- 5Y*
- 5.32%
- 10Y*
- 9.87%
VWO vs. VAW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VWO Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF | 8.50% | 25.60% | 10.59% | 9.25% | -17.98% | 1.26% | 15.17% | 20.75% | -14.76% | 31.49% |
VAW Vanguard Materials ETF | 9.07% | 12.30% | 0.48% | 13.67% | -11.80% | 27.43% | 19.44% | 23.53% | -17.49% | 23.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between VWO and VAW is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2005 | 0.71 |
The correlation between VWO and VAW shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (3 years) to 0.71 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VWO vs. VAW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VWO
VAW
Technology
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
Energy
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
VWO
VAW
Financial Services
VWO
VAW
-
Consumer Cyclical
VWO
VAW
Industrials
VWO
VAW
Basic Materials
VWO
VAW
Communication Services
VWO
VAW
-
Energy
VWO
VAW
Healthcare
VWO
VAW
Consumer Defensive
VWO
VAW
Utilities
VWO
VAW
-
Real Estate
VWO
VAW
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VWO vs. VAW — Risk / Return Rank
VWO
VAW
VWO vs. VAW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) and Vanguard Materials ETF (VAW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VWO | VAW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.18 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.18 | 1.34 | +0.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.79 | 4.32 | +3.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VWO | VAW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.49 | 1.01 | +0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | 0.27 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | 0.47 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.39 | -0.12 |
Drawdowns
VWO vs. VAW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VWO drawdown since its inception was -67.68%, which is greater than VAW's maximum drawdown of -62.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VWO and VAW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VWO | VAW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.68% | -62.17% | -5.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.17% | -13.42% | +2.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.37% | -23.21% | +5.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.60% | -25.50% | -7.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.39% | -41.13% | +4.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.67% | -7.27% | +2.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.81% | -9.63% | -6.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.12% | 4.14% | -1.02% |
Volatility
VWO vs. VAW - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) has a higher volatility of 6.29% compared to Vanguard Materials ETF (VAW) at 5.94%. This indicates that VWO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VAW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VWO | VAW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.29% | 5.94% | +0.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.80% | 14.18% | -0.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.37% | 17.88% | -1.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.45% | 19.65% | -2.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.23% | 21.22% | -1.99% |
VWO vs. VAW - Expense Ratio Comparison
VWO has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than VAW's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VWO vs. VAW - Dividend Comparison
VWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%, more than VAW's 1.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VAW Vanguard Materials ETF | 1.41% | 1.55% | 1.70% | 1.72% | 1.98% | 1.44% | 1.67% | 1.94% | 2.03% | 1.63% | 1.67% | 2.30% |
VWO Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF | 2.49% | 2.79% | 3.20% | 3.52% | 4.11% | 2.63% | 1.91% | 3.23% | 2.88% | 2.30% | 2.52% | 3.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VWO and VAW have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VWO has higher volatility (6.29%) compared to VAW (5.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VWO dropped -67.68% vs VAW's -62.17%.
On 10-year performance, VAW leads with 9.87% vs 8.60% for VWO. On fees, VWO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, VAW has been the lower-risk option at 5.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VAW has performed better with a 9.87% return vs 8.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VWO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for VAW.
VWO has the higher dividend yield at 2.49%, compared with 1.41% for VAW.
VWO is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while VAW is Materials. VWO tracks FTSE Emerging Index, while VAW tracks MSCI US Investable Market Materials 25/50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for VWO and 0.10% for VAW.
VWO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VWO and VAW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer