VWO vs. SPYV
VWO (Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF) and SPYV (SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VWO is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the FTSE Emerging Index, while SPYV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VWO returned 8.60%/yr vs 11.83%/yr for SPYV. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VWO charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SPYV.
Performance
VWO vs. SPYV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VWO achieves a 8.50% return, which is significantly higher than SPYV's 6.98% return. Over the past 10 years, VWO has underperformed SPYV with an annualized return of 8.60%, while SPYV has yielded a comparatively higher 11.83% annualized return.
VWO
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- -3.65%
- YTD
- 8.50%
- 6M
- 9.73%
- 1Y
- 24.29%
- 3Y*
- 16.22%
- 5Y*
- 4.65%
- 10Y*
- 8.60%
SPYV
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 0.75%
- YTD
- 6.98%
- 6M
- 7.88%
- 1Y
- 20.07%
- 3Y*
- 15.23%
- 5Y*
- 10.75%
- 10Y*
- 11.83%
VWO vs. SPYV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VWO Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF | 8.50% | 25.60% | 10.59% | 9.25% | -17.98% | 1.26% | 15.17% | 20.75% | -14.76% | 31.49% |
SPYV SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF | 6.98% | 13.18% | 12.24% | 22.20% | -5.28% | 24.91% | 1.38% | 31.70% | -9.01% | 15.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between VWO and SPYV is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2005 | 0.68 |
The correlation between VWO and SPYV shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (3 years) to 0.68 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VWO vs. SPYV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VWO
SPYV
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Energy
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
VWO
SPYV
Financial Services
VWO
SPYV
Consumer Cyclical
VWO
SPYV
Industrials
VWO
SPYV
Basic Materials
VWO
SPYV
Communication Services
VWO
SPYV
Energy
VWO
SPYV
Healthcare
VWO
SPYV
Consumer Defensive
VWO
SPYV
Utilities
VWO
SPYV
Real Estate
VWO
SPYV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VWO vs. SPYV — Risk / Return Rank
VWO
SPYV
VWO vs. SPYV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VWO | SPYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.36 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.18 | 3.24 | -1.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.79 | 12.39 | -4.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VWO | SPYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.49 | 2.04 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | 0.75 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | 0.70 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.42 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
VWO vs. SPYV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VWO drawdown since its inception was -67.68%, which is greater than SPYV's maximum drawdown of -58.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VWO and SPYV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VWO | SPYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.68% | -58.45% | -9.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.17% | -6.22% | -4.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.37% | -17.54% | +0.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.60% | -17.89% | -14.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.39% | -36.89% | +0.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.67% | -1.35% | -3.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.81% | -8.71% | -7.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.12% | 1.62% | +1.50% |
Volatility
VWO vs. SPYV - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) has a higher volatility of 6.29% compared to SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV) at 2.28%. This indicates that VWO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VWO | SPYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.29% | 2.28% | +4.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.80% | 7.18% | +6.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.37% | 9.91% | +6.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.45% | 14.41% | +3.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.23% | 16.95% | +2.28% |
VWO vs. SPYV - Expense Ratio Comparison
VWO has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYV's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VWO vs. SPYV - Dividend Comparison
VWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%, more than SPYV's 1.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPYV SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF | 1.70% | 1.77% | 2.29% | 1.75% | 2.22% | 2.10% | 2.38% | 2.25% | 2.97% | 2.77% | 2.39% | 2.53% |
VWO Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF | 2.49% | 2.79% | 3.20% | 3.52% | 4.11% | 2.63% | 1.91% | 3.23% | 2.88% | 2.30% | 2.52% | 3.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VWO and SPYV have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VWO has higher volatility (6.29%) compared to SPYV (2.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VWO dropped -67.68% vs SPYV's -58.45%.
On 10-year performance, SPYV leads with 11.83% vs 8.60% for VWO. On fees, SPYV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SPYV has been the lower-risk option at 2.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPYV has performed better with a 11.83% return vs 8.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for VWO.
VWO has the higher dividend yield at 2.49%, compared with 1.70% for SPYV.
VWO is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while SPYV is S&P 500. VWO tracks FTSE Emerging Index, while SPYV tracks S&P 500 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for VWO and 0.04% for SPYV.
SPYV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VWO and SPYV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer