PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VWO vs. QAI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VWO vs. QAI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) and IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF (QAI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VWO achieves a 8.50% return, which is significantly higher than QAI's 7.58% return. Over the past 10 years, VWO has outperformed QAI with an annualized return of 8.60%, while QAI has yielded a comparatively lower 3.79% annualized return.


VWO

1D
0.52%
1M
-3.65%
YTD
8.50%
6M
9.73%
1Y
24.29%
3Y*
16.22%
5Y*
4.65%
10Y*
8.60%

QAI

1D
0.42%
1M
-0.22%
YTD
7.58%
6M
8.00%
1Y
14.10%
3Y*
9.67%
5Y*
4.31%
10Y*
3.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VWO vs. QAI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VWO
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF
8.50%25.60%10.59%9.25%-17.98%1.26%15.17%20.75%-14.76%31.49%
QAI
IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF
7.58%8.29%6.67%10.07%-8.68%-0.16%5.73%8.68%-3.32%6.17%

Correlation

The correlation between VWO and QAI is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2009

0.71

The correlation between VWO and QAI shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (all time) to 0.83 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VWO vs. QAI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VWO
QAI

Technology

29.6%
21.9%

Financial Services

19.5%
19.5%

Consumer Cyclical

10.7%
7.3%

Industrials

8.0%
13.6%

Basic Materials

8.0%
5.3%

Communication Services

7.1%
11.2%

Energy

4.6%
3.7%

Healthcare

3.9%
7.1%

Consumer Defensive

3.7%
3.7%

Utilities

2.9%
3.8%

Real Estate

2.2%
2.9%

Technology

VWO
29.6%
QAI
21.9%

Financial Services

VWO
19.5%
QAI
19.5%

Consumer Cyclical

VWO
10.7%
QAI
7.3%

Industrials

VWO
8.0%
QAI
13.6%

Basic Materials

VWO
8.0%
QAI
5.3%

Communication Services

VWO
7.1%
QAI
11.2%

Energy

VWO
4.6%
QAI
3.7%

Healthcare

VWO
3.9%
QAI
7.1%

Consumer Defensive

VWO
3.7%
QAI
3.7%

Utilities

VWO
2.9%
QAI
3.8%

Real Estate

VWO
2.2%
QAI
2.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VWO vs. QAI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VWO
VWO Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
VWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWO Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
VWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWO Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

QAI
QAI Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
QAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
QAI Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
QAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
QAI Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VWO vs. QAI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) and IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF (QAI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VWOQAIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.45

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.18

3.81

-1.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.79

15.45

-7.66

VWO vs. QAI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VWO Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is lower than the QAI Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VWO and QAI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VWOQAIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.49

2.26

-0.77

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

0.66

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

0.61

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.56

-0.30

Drawdowns

VWO vs. QAI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VWO drawdown since its inception was -67.68%, which is greater than QAI's maximum drawdown of -14.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VWO and QAI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VWOQAIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.68%

-14.95%

-52.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.17%

-3.71%

-7.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.37%

-7.78%

-9.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.60%

-14.32%

-18.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.39%

-14.95%

-21.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.67%

-1.72%

-2.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.81%

-2.57%

-13.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.12%

0.91%

+2.21%

Volatility

VWO vs. QAI - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) has a higher volatility of 6.29% compared to IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF (QAI) at 2.56%. This indicates that VWO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QAI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VWOQAIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.29%

2.56%

+3.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.80%

5.25%

+8.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.37%

6.26%

+10.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.45%

6.60%

+10.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.23%

6.19%

+13.04%

VWO vs. QAI - Expense Ratio Comparison

VWO has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than QAI's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

VWO vs. QAI - Dividend Comparison

VWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%, more than QAI's 1.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QAI
IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF
1.40%1.50%2.22%4.08%2.00%0.28%1.98%1.91%1.90%0.00%0.00%0.48%
VWO
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF
2.49%2.79%3.20%3.52%4.11%2.63%1.91%3.23%2.88%2.30%2.52%3.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


VWO and QAI have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VWO has higher volatility (6.29%) compared to QAI (2.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VWO dropped -67.68% vs QAI's -14.95%.

On 10-year performance, VWO leads with 8.60% vs 3.79% for QAI. On fees, VWO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, QAI has been the lower-risk option at 2.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VWO has performed better with a 8.60% return vs 3.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VWO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for QAI.

VWO has the higher dividend yield at 2.49%, compared with 1.40% for QAI.

VWO is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while QAI is Long-Short. VWO tracks FTSE Emerging Index, while QAI tracks IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and New York Life. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for VWO and 0.79% for QAI.

QAI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VWO and QAI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer