VWO vs. IVV
VWO (Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF) and IVV (iShares Core S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VWO is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the FTSE Emerging Index, while IVV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VWO returned 8.60%/yr vs 15.32%/yr for IVV. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VWO charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for IVV.
Performance
VWO vs. IVV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with VWO having a 8.50% return and IVV slightly higher at 8.72%. Over the past 10 years, VWO has underperformed IVV with an annualized return of 8.60%, while IVV has yielded a comparatively higher 15.32% annualized return.
VWO
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- -3.65%
- YTD
- 8.50%
- 6M
- 9.73%
- 1Y
- 24.29%
- 3Y*
- 16.22%
- 5Y*
- 4.65%
- 10Y*
- 8.60%
IVV
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 8.72%
- 6M
- 8.76%
- 1Y
- 24.89%
- 3Y*
- 21.44%
- 5Y*
- 13.50%
- 10Y*
- 15.32%
VWO vs. IVV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VWO Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF | 8.50% | 25.60% | 10.59% | 9.25% | -17.98% | 1.26% | 15.17% | 20.75% | -14.76% | 31.49% |
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 8.72% | 17.85% | 24.93% | 26.31% | -18.16% | 28.76% | 18.40% | 31.07% | -4.49% | 21.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between VWO and IVV is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2005 | 0.74 |
The correlation between VWO and IVV shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (5 years) to 0.74 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VWO vs. IVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VWO
IVV
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Energy
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
VWO
IVV
Financial Services
VWO
IVV
Consumer Cyclical
VWO
IVV
Industrials
VWO
IVV
Basic Materials
VWO
IVV
Communication Services
VWO
IVV
Energy
VWO
IVV
Healthcare
VWO
IVV
Consumer Defensive
VWO
IVV
Utilities
VWO
IVV
Real Estate
VWO
IVV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VWO vs. IVV — Risk / Return Rank
VWO
IVV
VWO vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VWO | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.38 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.18 | 2.81 | -0.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.79 | 12.97 | -5.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VWO | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.49 | 2.07 | -0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | 0.80 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | 0.85 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.45 | -0.19 |
Drawdowns
VWO vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VWO drawdown since its inception was -67.68%, which is greater than IVV's maximum drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VWO and IVV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VWO | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.68% | -55.25% | -12.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.17% | -8.89% | -2.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.37% | -18.75% | +1.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.60% | -24.53% | -8.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.39% | -33.90% | -2.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.67% | -2.67% | -2.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.81% | -10.77% | -5.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.12% | 1.92% | +1.20% |
Volatility
VWO vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) has a higher volatility of 6.29% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) at 3.77%. This indicates that VWO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VWO | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.29% | 3.77% | +2.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.80% | 9.31% | +4.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.37% | 12.08% | +4.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.45% | 16.92% | +0.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.23% | 18.07% | +1.16% |
VWO vs. IVV - Expense Ratio Comparison
VWO has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than IVV's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VWO vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison
VWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%, more than IVV's 1.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 1.09% | 1.17% | 1.30% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.20% | 1.57% | 1.85% | 2.21% | 1.75% | 2.01% | 2.27% |
VWO Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF | 2.49% | 2.79% | 3.20% | 3.52% | 4.11% | 2.63% | 1.91% | 3.23% | 2.88% | 2.30% | 2.52% | 3.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VWO and IVV have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VWO has higher volatility (6.29%) compared to IVV (3.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VWO dropped -67.68% vs IVV's -55.25%.
On 10-year performance, IVV leads with 15.32% vs 8.60% for VWO. On fees, IVV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, IVV has been the lower-risk option at 3.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IVV has performed better with a 15.32% return vs 8.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IVV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for VWO.
VWO has the higher dividend yield at 2.49%, compared with 1.09% for IVV.
VWO is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while IVV is S&P 500. VWO tracks FTSE Emerging Index, while IVV tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for VWO and 0.03% for IVV.
IVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VWO and IVV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer