PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VWO vs. IVV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VWO vs. IVV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with VWO having a 8.50% return and IVV slightly higher at 8.72%. Over the past 10 years, VWO has underperformed IVV with an annualized return of 8.60%, while IVV has yielded a comparatively higher 15.32% annualized return.


VWO

1D
0.52%
1M
-3.65%
YTD
8.50%
6M
9.73%
1Y
24.29%
3Y*
16.22%
5Y*
4.65%
10Y*
8.60%

IVV

1D
0.24%
1M
0.23%
YTD
8.72%
6M
8.76%
1Y
24.89%
3Y*
21.44%
5Y*
13.50%
10Y*
15.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VWO vs. IVV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VWO
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF
8.50%25.60%10.59%9.25%-17.98%1.26%15.17%20.75%-14.76%31.49%
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
8.72%17.85%24.93%26.31%-18.16%28.76%18.40%31.07%-4.49%21.75%

Correlation

The correlation between VWO and IVV is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2005

0.74

The correlation between VWO and IVV shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (5 years) to 0.74 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VWO vs. IVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VWO
IVV

Technology

29.6%
35.6%

Financial Services

19.5%
11.8%

Consumer Cyclical

10.7%
10.1%

Industrials

8.0%
8.3%

Basic Materials

8.0%
1.8%

Communication Services

7.1%
11.2%

Energy

4.6%
3.5%

Healthcare

3.9%
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

3.7%
4.9%

Utilities

2.9%
2.4%

Real Estate

2.2%
1.9%

Technology

VWO
29.6%
IVV
35.6%

Financial Services

VWO
19.5%
IVV
11.8%

Consumer Cyclical

VWO
10.7%
IVV
10.1%

Industrials

VWO
8.0%
IVV
8.3%

Basic Materials

VWO
8.0%
IVV
1.8%

Communication Services

VWO
7.1%
IVV
11.2%

Energy

VWO
4.6%
IVV
3.5%

Healthcare

VWO
3.9%
IVV
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

VWO
3.7%
IVV
4.9%

Utilities

VWO
2.9%
IVV
2.4%

Real Estate

VWO
2.2%
IVV
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VWO vs. IVV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VWO
VWO Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
VWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWO Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
VWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWO Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

IVV
IVV Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
IVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVV Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
IVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVV Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VWO vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VWOIVVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.38

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.18

2.81

-0.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.79

12.97

-5.17

VWO vs. IVV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VWO Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is comparable to the IVV Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VWO and IVV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VWOIVVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.49

2.07

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

0.80

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

0.85

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.45

-0.19

Drawdowns

VWO vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VWO drawdown since its inception was -67.68%, which is greater than IVV's maximum drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VWO and IVV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VWOIVVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.68%

-55.25%

-12.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.17%

-8.89%

-2.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.37%

-18.75%

+1.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.60%

-24.53%

-8.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.39%

-33.90%

-2.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.67%

-2.67%

-2.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.81%

-10.77%

-5.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.12%

1.92%

+1.20%

Volatility

VWO vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) has a higher volatility of 6.29% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) at 3.77%. This indicates that VWO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VWOIVVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.29%

3.77%

+2.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.80%

9.31%

+4.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.37%

12.08%

+4.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.45%

16.92%

+0.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.23%

18.07%

+1.16%

VWO vs. IVV - Expense Ratio Comparison

VWO has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than IVV's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VWO vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison

VWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%, more than IVV's 1.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
1.09%1.17%1.30%1.44%1.66%1.20%1.57%1.85%2.21%1.75%2.01%2.27%
VWO
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF
2.49%2.79%3.20%3.52%4.11%2.63%1.91%3.23%2.88%2.30%2.52%3.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


VWO and IVV have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VWO has higher volatility (6.29%) compared to IVV (3.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VWO dropped -67.68% vs IVV's -55.25%.

On 10-year performance, IVV leads with 15.32% vs 8.60% for VWO. On fees, IVV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, IVV has been the lower-risk option at 3.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IVV has performed better with a 15.32% return vs 8.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IVV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for VWO.

VWO has the higher dividend yield at 2.49%, compared with 1.09% for IVV.

VWO is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while IVV is S&P 500. VWO tracks FTSE Emerging Index, while IVV tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for VWO and 0.03% for IVV.

IVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VWO and IVV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer