PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VV vs. VB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VV vs. VB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VV achieves a 8.51% return, which is significantly lower than VB's 12.60% return. Over the past 10 years, VV has outperformed VB with an annualized return of 15.36%, while VB has yielded a comparatively lower 11.18% annualized return.


VV

1D
0.24%
1M
0.45%
YTD
8.51%
6M
8.47%
1Y
24.49%
3Y*
21.67%
5Y*
13.12%
10Y*
15.36%

VB

1D
0.40%
1M
0.41%
YTD
12.60%
6M
12.39%
1Y
25.97%
3Y*
15.91%
5Y*
6.58%
10Y*
11.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VV vs. VB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VV
Vanguard Large-Cap ETF
8.51%18.11%25.25%27.18%-19.91%27.41%21.04%31.25%-4.46%22.00%
VB
Vanguard Small-Cap ETF
12.60%8.87%14.17%18.22%-17.51%17.57%19.19%27.34%-9.34%16.26%

Correlation

The correlation between VV and VB is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004

0.89

The correlation between VV and VB shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (1 year) to 0.89 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VV vs. VB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VV
VB

Technology

35.9%
17.2%

Financial Services

11.8%
12.6%

Communication Services

11.2%
3.1%

Consumer Cyclical

9.8%
11.3%

Healthcare

8.6%
11.1%

Industrials

8.0%
20.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
3.4%

Energy

3.6%
4.7%

Utilities

2.7%
3.3%

Real Estate

1.7%
7.6%

Basic Materials

1.6%
4.8%

Technology

VV
35.9%
VB
17.2%

Financial Services

VV
11.8%
VB
12.6%

Communication Services

VV
11.2%
VB
3.1%

Consumer Cyclical

VV
9.8%
VB
11.3%

Healthcare

VV
8.6%
VB
11.1%

Industrials

VV
8.0%
VB
20.8%

Consumer Defensive

VV
4.8%
VB
3.4%

Energy

VV
3.6%
VB
4.7%

Utilities

VV
2.7%
VB
3.3%

Real Estate

VV
1.7%
VB
7.6%

Basic Materials

VV
1.6%
VB
4.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VV vs. VB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VV
VV Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
VV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
VV Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
VV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
VV Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

VB
VB Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
VB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
VB Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
VB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
VB Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VV vs. VB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VVVBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.28

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.67

2.91

-0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.13

10.66

+1.47

VV vs. VB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VV Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is comparable to the VB Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VV and VB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VVVBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.01

1.59

+0.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

0.32

+0.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

0.52

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.44

+0.15

Drawdowns

VV vs. VB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VV drawdown since its inception was -54.81%, smaller than the maximum VB drawdown of -59.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VV and VB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VVVBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.81%

-59.56%

+4.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.21%

-8.98%

-0.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.97%

-25.36%

+6.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.66%

-28.15%

+2.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.28%

-42.05%

+7.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.67%

-2.04%

-0.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.83%

-8.43%

+1.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.02%

2.44%

-0.42%

Volatility

VV vs. VB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV) is 3.77%, while Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) has a volatility of 4.62%. This indicates that VV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VVVBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.77%

4.62%

-0.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.39%

11.97%

-2.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.26%

16.45%

-4.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.26%

20.77%

-3.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.22%

21.44%

-3.22%

VV vs. VB - Expense Ratio Comparison

VV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than VB's 0.05% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VV vs. VB - Dividend Comparison

VV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, less than VB's 1.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VB
Vanguard Small-Cap ETF
1.21%1.33%1.30%1.55%1.59%1.24%1.14%1.39%1.67%1.35%1.50%1.48%
VV
Vanguard Large-Cap ETF
0.99%1.08%1.24%1.41%1.66%1.19%1.46%1.81%2.09%1.75%1.98%1.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


VV and VB have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VB has higher volatility (4.62%) compared to VV (3.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VV dropped -54.81% vs VB's -59.56%.

On 10-year performance, VV leads with 15.36% vs 11.18% for VB. On fees, VV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VV has been the lower-risk option at 3.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VV has performed better with a 15.36% return vs 11.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for VB.

VB has the higher dividend yield at 1.21%, compared with 0.99% for VV.

VV is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while VB is Small Cap Blend Equities. VV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Index, while VB tracks CRSP US Small Cap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for VV and 0.05% for VB.

VV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VV and VB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer