VUSA.L vs. SMH
VUSA.L (Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF) and SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VUSA.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VUSA.L returned 15.87%/yr vs 37.84%/yr for SMH. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VUSA.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SMH.
Performance
VUSA.L vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
VUSA.L is traded in GBP, while SMH is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SMH values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VUSA.L achieves a 9.33% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 67.71% return. Over the past 10 years, VUSA.L has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 15.87%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 37.84% annualized return.
VUSA.L
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- 2.89%
- YTD
- 9.33%
- 6M
- 8.95%
- 1Y
- 27.06%
- 3Y*
- 19.01%
- 5Y*
- 14.56%
- 10Y*
- 15.87%
SMH
- 1D
- 4.97%
- 1M
- 7.87%
- YTD
- 67.71%
- 6M
- 62.54%
- 1Y
- 140.67%
- 3Y*
- 57.29%
- 5Y*
- 39.44%
- 10Y*
- 37.84%
VUSA.L vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VUSA.L Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 9.33% | 9.39% | 27.33% | 19.82% | -9.02% | 30.97% | 13.65% | 26.53% | -0.10% | 10.72% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 67.71% | 38.54% | 41.53% | 64.71% | -25.63% | 43.48% | 50.97% | 58.19% | -3.66% | 26.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between VUSA.L and SMH is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2012 | 0.47 |
The correlation between VUSA.L and SMH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.
VUSA.L vs. SMH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VUSA.L
SMH
Technology
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
VUSA.L
SMH
Financial Services
VUSA.L
SMH
-
Communication Services
VUSA.L
SMH
-
Consumer Cyclical
VUSA.L
SMH
-
Healthcare
VUSA.L
SMH
-
Industrials
VUSA.L
SMH
-
Consumer Defensive
VUSA.L
SMH
-
Energy
VUSA.L
SMH
-
Utilities
VUSA.L
SMH
-
Real Estate
VUSA.L
SMH
-
Basic Materials
VUSA.L
SMH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VUSA.L vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
VUSA.L
SMH
VUSA.L vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (VUSA.L) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VUSA.L | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.65 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.79 | 11.31 | -7.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.96 | 39.50 | -25.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VUSA.L | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.54 | 4.54 | -2.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.02 | 1.17 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.01 | 1.19 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.07 | 0.83 | +0.24 |
Drawdowns
VUSA.L vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VUSA.L drawdown since its inception was -25.48%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -47.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VUSA.L and SMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VUSA.L | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.48% | -47.21% | +21.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.10% | -12.51% | +5.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.93% | -35.65% | +14.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.93% | -35.65% | +14.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.48% | -35.65% | +10.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.30% | -5.70% | +4.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.16% | -8.74% | +5.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.93% | 3.58% | -1.65% |
Volatility
VUSA.L vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (VUSA.L) is 2.72%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 14.70%. This indicates that VUSA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VUSA.L | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.72% | 14.70% | -11.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.14% | 25.21% | -18.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.63% | 31.23% | -20.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.30% | 33.77% | -19.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.65% | 32.05% | -16.40% |
VUSA.L vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
VUSA.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
VUSA.L vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
VUSA.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, more than SMH's 0.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.18% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
VUSA.L Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 0.87% | 0.95% | 1.00% | 1.24% | 1.41% | 1.04% | 1.44% | 1.50% | 1.72% | 1.61% | 1.58% | 1.74% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VUSA.L and SMH have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VUSA.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VUSA.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SMH.
VUSA.L is categorized as S&P 500, while SMH is Semiconductors. VUSA.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VUSA.L and 0.35% for SMH.
Find the right allocation for VUSA.L and SMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer