VUG vs. XMMO

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

VUG (Vanguard Growth ETF) and XMMO (Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VUG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index, while XMMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VUG returned 17.95%/yr vs 19.50%/yr for XMMO. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VUG charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XMMO.

Performance

VUG vs. XMMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VUG achieves a 6.14% return, which is significantly lower than XMMO's 19.66% return. Over the past 10 years, VUG has underperformed XMMO with an annualized return of 17.95%, while XMMO has yielded a comparatively higher 19.50% annualized return.

VUG

• 1D: 0.33%
• 1M: -0.73%
• YTD: 6.14%
• 6M: 5.11%
• 1Y: 23.11%
• 3Y*: 24.71%
• 5Y*: 14.33%
• 10Y*: 17.95%

XMMO

• 1D: 0.46%
• 1M: -0.10%
• YTD: 19.66%
• 6M: 19.51%
• 1Y: 31.14%
• 3Y*: 29.91%
• 5Y*: 15.72%
• 10Y*: 19.50%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VUG vs. XMMO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF	6.14%	19.40%	32.69%	46.83%	-33.16%	27.35%	40.25%	37.03%	-3.32%	27.72%
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF	19.66%	13.04%	38.03%	20.39%	-16.02%	16.69%	29.17%	36.78%	6.12%	37.18%

Correlation

The correlation between VUG and XMMO is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.61
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.66
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.70
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2005	0.82

Over the past year, the correlation between VUG and XMMO has dropped to 0.61 - well below their long-term average of 0.82, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

VUG vs. XMMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VUG	XMMO
Technology	53.5%	16.7%
Communication Services	17.3%	1.6%
Consumer Cyclical	12.2%	4.6%
Healthcare	4.6%	6.3%
Financial Services	4.3%	2.4%
Industrials	3.6%	41.1%
Consumer Defensive	1.5%	0.5%
Real Estate	1.0%	6.1%
Utilities	0.9%	5.8%
Basic Materials	0.6%	7.2%
Energy	0.4%	7.7%

Return for Risk

VUG vs. XMMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VUG

VUG Risk / Return Rank: 40
VUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
VUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
VUG Omega Ratio Rank: 44
VUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
VUG Martin Ratio Rank: 35

XMMO

XMMO Risk / Return Rank: 64
XMMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
XMMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
XMMO Omega Ratio Rank: 52
XMMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
XMMO Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VUG vs. XMMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VUG	XMMO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.43	1.63	-0.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.95	2.29	-0.34
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.29	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.40	3.75	-2.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.90	15.23	-10.33
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VUG vs. XMMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VUG Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is comparable to the XMMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VUG and XMMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VUG	XMMO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.43	1.63	-0.20
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65	0.73	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.84	0.88	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.61	0.57	+0.04

Drawdowns

VUG vs. XMMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VUG drawdown since its inception was -50.68%, smaller than the maximum XMMO drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VUG and XMMO.

Drawdown Indicators

	VUG	XMMO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.68%	-55.37%	+4.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.53%	-8.34%	-8.19%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.85%	-24.93%	+2.08%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.61%	-27.91%	-7.70%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.61%	-36.74%	+1.13%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.52%	-3.69%	-0.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.09%	-9.45%	+2.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.73%	2.07%	+2.66%

Volatility

VUG vs. XMMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) is 5.17%, while Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) has a volatility of 7.70%. This indicates that VUG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VUG	XMMO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.17%	7.70%	-2.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.68%	16.07%	-3.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.25%	19.18%	-2.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.28%	21.52%	+0.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.48%	22.31%	-0.83%

VUG vs. XMMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

VUG has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than XMMO's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

VUG vs. XMMO - Dividend Comparison

VUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, less than XMMO's 0.62% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF	0.38%	0.41%	0.47%	0.58%	0.70%	0.48%	0.66%	0.95%	1.32%	1.14%	1.39%	1.30%
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF	0.62%	0.78%	0.34%	0.80%	1.43%	0.41%	0.61%	0.60%	0.19%	0.21%	0.22%	0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VUG and XMMO in my portfolio?

VUG and XMMO have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VUG or XMMO?

XMMO has higher volatility (7.70%) compared to VUG (5.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VUG dropped -50.68% vs XMMO's -55.37%.

Which ETF is better, VUG or XMMO?

On 10-year performance, XMMO leads with 19.50% vs 17.95% for VUG. On fees, VUG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VUG has been the lower-risk option at 5.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VUG or XMMO?

Over the 10-year period, XMMO has performed better with a 19.50% return vs 17.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VUG or XMMO?

VUG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XMMO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VUG or XMMO?

XMMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.62%, compared with 0.38% for VUG.

What is the main difference between VUG and XMMO?

VUG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while XMMO is Momentum. VUG tracks CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index, while XMMO tracks S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VUG and 0.35% for XMMO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XMMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.