VTV vs. SPHQ
VTV (Vanguard Value ETF) and SPHQ (Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VTV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index, while SPHQ is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VTV returned 12.42%/yr vs 14.91%/yr for SPHQ. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VTV charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SPHQ.
Performance
VTV vs. SPHQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VTV achieves a 11.91% return, which is significantly lower than SPHQ's 14.28% return. Over the past 10 years, VTV has underperformed SPHQ with an annualized return of 12.42%, while SPHQ has yielded a comparatively higher 14.91% annualized return.
VTV
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 2.67%
- YTD
- 11.91%
- 6M
- 13.41%
- 1Y
- 25.49%
- 3Y*
- 17.72%
- 5Y*
- 11.30%
- 10Y*
- 12.42%
SPHQ
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- 3.64%
- YTD
- 14.28%
- 6M
- 15.48%
- 1Y
- 21.15%
- 3Y*
- 22.07%
- 5Y*
- 14.25%
- 10Y*
- 14.91%
VTV vs. SPHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 11.91% | 15.27% | 15.95% | 9.32% | -2.09% | 26.53% | 2.33% | 25.66% | -5.47% | 17.15% |
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 14.28% | 13.25% | 25.44% | 24.83% | -15.76% | 28.03% | 17.36% | 33.64% | -7.10% | 19.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between VTV and SPHQ is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2005 | 0.83 |
The correlation between VTV and SPHQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
VTV vs. SPHQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VTV
SPHQ
Financial Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
VTV
SPHQ
Healthcare
VTV
SPHQ
Industrials
VTV
SPHQ
Technology
VTV
SPHQ
Consumer Defensive
VTV
SPHQ
Energy
VTV
SPHQ
Utilities
VTV
SPHQ
Consumer Cyclical
VTV
SPHQ
Communication Services
VTV
SPHQ
Basic Materials
VTV
SPHQ
Real Estate
VTV
SPHQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VTV vs. SPHQ — Risk / Return Rank
VTV
SPHQ
VTV vs. SPHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VTV | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.28 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.03 | 2.39 | +1.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.20 | 10.19 | +5.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VTV | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.52 | 1.66 | +0.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 | 0.87 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 | 0.84 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 0.53 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
VTV vs. SPHQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VTV drawdown since its inception was -59.27%, roughly equal to the maximum SPHQ drawdown of -57.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTV and SPHQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VTV | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.27% | -57.83% | -1.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.35% | -8.90% | +2.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.52% | -16.57% | +2.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.04% | -25.04% | +8.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.78% | -31.60% | -5.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.11% | -1.62% | +0.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.87% | -10.70% | +2.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.68% | 2.09% | -0.41% |
Volatility
VTV vs. SPHQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) is 2.65%, while Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) has a volatility of 3.90%. This indicates that VTV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPHQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VTV | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.65% | 3.90% | -1.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.67% | 10.45% | -2.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.18% | 12.83% | -2.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.89% | 16.48% | -2.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.68% | 17.88% | -1.20% |
VTV vs. SPHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
VTV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than SPHQ's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VTV vs. SPHQ - Dividend Comparison
VTV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%, more than SPHQ's 1.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 1.05% | 1.09% | 1.15% | 1.42% | 1.85% | 1.19% | 1.55% | 1.51% | 1.85% | 1.57% | 1.67% | 2.29% |
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 1.87% | 2.05% | 2.31% | 2.46% | 2.52% | 2.15% | 2.56% | 2.50% | 2.73% | 2.29% | 2.44% | 2.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VTV and SPHQ have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPHQ has higher volatility (3.90%) compared to VTV (2.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTV dropped -59.27% vs SPHQ's -57.83%.
On 10-year performance, SPHQ leads with 14.91% vs 12.42% for VTV. On fees, VTV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VTV has been the lower-risk option at 2.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPHQ has performed better with a 14.91% return vs 12.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SPHQ.
VTV has the higher dividend yield at 1.87%, compared with 1.05% for SPHQ.
VTV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while SPHQ is S&P 500. VTV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Value Index, while SPHQ tracks S&P 500 Quality Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for VTV and 0.15% for SPHQ.
VTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VTV and SPHQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer