VTV vs. IWR
VTV (Vanguard Value ETF) and IWR (iShares Russell Midcap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VTV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index, while IWR is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell Midcap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VTV returned 12.42%/yr vs 11.41%/yr for IWR. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VTV charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for IWR.
Performance
VTV vs. IWR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VTV achieves a 11.91% return, which is significantly higher than IWR's 10.71% return. Over the past 10 years, VTV has outperformed IWR with an annualized return of 12.42%, while IWR has yielded a comparatively lower 11.41% annualized return.
VTV
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 2.67%
- YTD
- 11.91%
- 6M
- 13.41%
- 1Y
- 25.49%
- 3Y*
- 17.72%
- 5Y*
- 11.30%
- 10Y*
- 12.42%
IWR
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 1.05%
- YTD
- 10.71%
- 6M
- 10.50%
- 1Y
- 19.23%
- 3Y*
- 16.25%
- 5Y*
- 7.68%
- 10Y*
- 11.41%
VTV vs. IWR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 11.91% | 15.27% | 15.95% | 9.32% | -2.09% | 26.53% | 2.33% | 25.66% | -5.47% | 17.15% |
IWR iShares Russell Midcap ETF | 10.71% | 10.37% | 15.21% | 17.05% | -17.48% | 22.44% | 16.93% | 30.23% | -9.10% | 18.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between VTV and IWR is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2004 | 0.90 |
The correlation between VTV and IWR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
VTV vs. IWR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VTV
IWR
Financial Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Financial Services
VTV
IWR
Healthcare
VTV
IWR
Industrials
VTV
IWR
Technology
VTV
IWR
Consumer Defensive
VTV
IWR
Energy
VTV
IWR
Utilities
VTV
IWR
Consumer Cyclical
VTV
IWR
Communication Services
VTV
IWR
Basic Materials
VTV
IWR
Real Estate
VTV
IWR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VTV vs. IWR — Risk / Return Rank
VTV
IWR
VTV vs. IWR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) and iShares Russell Midcap ETF (IWR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VTV | IWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.25 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.03 | 2.37 | +1.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.20 | 9.09 | +6.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VTV | IWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.52 | 1.43 | +1.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 | 0.42 | +0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 | 0.59 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 0.49 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
VTV vs. IWR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VTV drawdown since its inception was -59.27%, roughly equal to the maximum IWR drawdown of -58.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTV and IWR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VTV | IWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.27% | -58.78% | -0.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.35% | -8.17% | +1.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.52% | -21.09% | +6.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.04% | -26.18% | +9.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.78% | -40.59% | +3.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.11% | -2.04% | +0.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.87% | -7.80% | -0.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.68% | 2.12% | -0.44% |
Volatility
VTV vs. IWR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) is 2.65%, while iShares Russell Midcap ETF (IWR) has a volatility of 3.59%. This indicates that VTV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VTV | IWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.65% | 3.59% | -0.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.67% | 10.06% | -2.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.18% | 13.54% | -3.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.89% | 18.25% | -4.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.68% | 19.38% | -2.70% |
VTV vs. IWR - Expense Ratio Comparison
VTV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than IWR's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VTV vs. IWR - Dividend Comparison
VTV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%, more than IWR's 1.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWR iShares Russell Midcap ETF | 1.17% | 1.29% | 1.27% | 1.43% | 1.59% | 1.04% | 1.28% | 1.43% | 1.98% | 1.52% | 1.72% | 1.59% |
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 1.87% | 2.05% | 2.31% | 2.46% | 2.52% | 2.15% | 2.56% | 2.50% | 2.73% | 2.29% | 2.44% | 2.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VTV and IWR have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IWR has higher volatility (3.59%) compared to VTV (2.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTV dropped -59.27% vs IWR's -58.78%.
On 10-year performance, VTV leads with 12.42% vs 11.41% for IWR. On fees, VTV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VTV has been the lower-risk option at 2.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VTV has performed better with a 12.42% return vs 11.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for IWR.
VTV has the higher dividend yield at 1.87%, compared with 1.17% for IWR.
VTV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while IWR is Mid Cap Growth Equities. VTV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Value Index, while IWR tracks Russell Midcap Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for VTV and 0.19% for IWR.
VTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VTV and IWR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer