PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTV vs. CMDY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VTV vs. CMDY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) and iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF (CMDY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTV achieves a 11.91% return, which is significantly lower than CMDY's 21.76% return.


VTV

1D
0.25%
1M
2.67%
YTD
11.91%
6M
13.41%
1Y
25.49%
3Y*
17.72%
5Y*
11.30%
10Y*
12.42%

CMDY

1D
0.27%
1M
-3.10%
YTD
21.76%
6M
21.83%
1Y
31.65%
3Y*
14.14%
5Y*
9.88%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTV vs. CMDY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
11.91%15.27%15.95%9.32%-2.09%26.53%2.33%25.66%-3.46%
CMDY
iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF
21.76%15.81%5.43%-9.33%14.55%26.38%1.15%4.96%-11.13%

Correlation

The correlation between VTV and CMDY is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2018

0.27

The correlation between VTV and CMDY shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VTV vs. CMDY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VTV
CMDY

Financial Services

22.3%

-

Healthcare

14.5%

-

Industrials

14.0%

-

Technology

13.4%

-

Consumer Defensive

9.4%

-

Energy

8.1%

-

Utilities

5.2%

-

Consumer Cyclical

4.0%

-

Communication Services

3.3%
100.0%

Basic Materials

3.1%

-

Real Estate

2.8%

-

Financial Services

VTV
22.3%
CMDY

-

Healthcare

VTV
14.5%
CMDY

-

Industrials

VTV
14.0%
CMDY

-

Technology

VTV
13.4%
CMDY

-

Consumer Defensive

VTV
9.4%
CMDY

-

Energy

VTV
8.1%
CMDY

-

Utilities

VTV
5.2%
CMDY

-

Consumer Cyclical

VTV
4.0%
CMDY

-

Communication Services

VTV
3.3%
CMDY
100.0%

Basic Materials

VTV
3.1%
CMDY

-

Real Estate

VTV
2.8%
CMDY

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTV vs. CMDY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTV
VTV Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
VTV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTV Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
VTV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTV Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

CMDY
CMDY Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
CMDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMDY Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
CMDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMDY Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTV vs. CMDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) and iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF (CMDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VTVCMDYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.35

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.03

4.11

-0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.20

11.95

+3.26

VTV vs. CMDY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTV Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is comparable to the CMDY Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTV and CMDY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VTVCMDYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.52

1.96

+0.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

0.63

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.53

-0.02

Drawdowns

VTV vs. CMDY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTV drawdown since its inception was -59.27%, which is greater than CMDY's maximum drawdown of -31.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTV and CMDY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTVCMDYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.27%

-31.19%

-28.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.35%

-7.73%

+1.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.52%

-10.08%

-4.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.04%

-26.56%

+9.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.11%

-6.78%

+5.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.87%

-13.13%

+5.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.68%

2.66%

-0.98%

Volatility

VTV vs. CMDY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) is 2.65%, while iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF (CMDY) has a volatility of 5.12%. This indicates that VTV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTVCMDYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.65%

5.12%

-2.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.67%

14.45%

-6.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.18%

16.28%

-6.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.89%

15.83%

-1.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.68%

14.65%

+2.03%

VTV vs. CMDY - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than CMDY's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

VTV vs. CMDY - Dividend Comparison

VTV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%, less than CMDY's 10.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CMDY
iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF
10.59%12.89%4.23%5.10%3.98%16.09%0.15%2.21%1.73%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
1.87%2.05%2.31%2.46%2.52%2.15%2.56%2.50%2.73%2.29%2.44%2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


VTV and CMDY have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CMDY has higher volatility (5.12%) compared to VTV (2.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTV dropped -59.27% vs CMDY's -31.19%.

On 5-year performance, VTV leads with 11.30% vs 9.88% for CMDY. On fees, VTV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VTV has been the lower-risk option at 2.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VTV has performed better with a 11.30% return vs 9.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for CMDY.

CMDY has the higher dividend yield at 10.59%, compared with 1.87% for VTV.

VTV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while CMDY is Commodities. VTV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Value Index, while CMDY tracks Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for VTV and 0.28% for CMDY.

VTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTV and CMDY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer