VTR vs. 0012.HK

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

VTR (Ventas, Inc.) and 0012.HK (Henderson Land) are both stocks. Both are in the Real Estate sector — VTR in REIT - Healthcare Facilities, 0012.HK in Real Estate - Diversified. Over the past 10 years, VTR returned 5.81%/yr vs 4.22%/yr for 0012.HK. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

VTR vs. 0012.HK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ventas, Inc. (VTR) and Henderson Land (0012.HK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

VTR is traded in USD, while 0012.HK is traded in HKD. To make them comparable, the 0012.HK values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTR achieves a 3.55% return, which is significantly lower than 0012.HK's 3.96% return. Over the past 10 years, VTR has outperformed 0012.HK with an annualized return of 5.81%, while 0012.HK has yielded a comparatively lower 4.22% annualized return.

VTR

• 1D: -2.93%
• 1M: -8.76%
• YTD: 3.55%
• 6M: -0.47%
• 1Y: 28.55%
• 3Y*: 24.27%
• 5Y*: 10.32%
• 10Y*: 5.81%

0012.HK

• 1D: -1.22%
• 1M: -13.24%
• YTD: 3.96%
• 6M: -0.13%
• 1Y: 21.66%
• 3Y*: 14.07%
• 5Y*: 1.05%
• 10Y*: 4.22%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTR vs. 0012.HK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VTR Ventas, Inc.	3.55%	35.09%	22.24%	15.06%	-8.53%	7.73%	-9.80%	3.42%	3.45%	0.71%
0012.HK Henderson Land	3.96%	28.05%	6.29%	-4.70%	-12.98%	14.71%	-15.82%	13.29%	-13.66%	41.01%

Correlation

The correlation between VTR and 0012.HK is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.07
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.06
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.09
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2007	0.06

Return for Risk

VTR vs. 0012.HK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTR

VTR Risk / Return Rank: 81
VTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
VTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
VTR Omega Ratio Rank: 80
VTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
VTR Martin Ratio Rank: 86

0012.HK

0012.HK Risk / Return Rank: 70
0012.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
0012.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
0012.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 66
0012.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
0012.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTR vs. 0012.HK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ventas, Inc. (VTR) and Henderson Land (0012.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VTR	0012.HK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.51	1.10	+0.41
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.22	1.65	+0.58
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.21	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.29	1.61	+0.68
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.00	4.20	+4.80
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VTR vs. 0012.HK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTR Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is higher than the 0012.HK Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTR and 0012.HK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VTR	0012.HK	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.51	1.10	+0.41
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.42	0.04	+0.38
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.17	0.18	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.30	0.14	+0.16

Drawdowns

VTR vs. 0012.HK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTR drawdown since its inception was -83.38%, which is greater than 0012.HK's maximum drawdown of -70.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTR and 0012.HK.

Drawdown Indicators

	VTR	0012.HK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-83.38%	-70.50%	-12.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.52%	-18.66%	+6.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.35%	-26.90%	+7.55%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-41.80%	-46.91%	+5.11%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-76.92%	-48.74%	-28.18%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.88%	-17.02%	+5.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.20%	-22.61%	+4.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.18%	7.06%	-3.88%

Volatility

VTR vs. 0012.HK - Volatility Comparison

Ventas, Inc. (VTR) and Henderson Land (0012.HK) have volatilities of 7.93% and 7.84%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VTR	0012.HK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.93%	7.84%	+0.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.62%	19.52%	-4.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.04%	27.44%	-8.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.96%	27.64%	-2.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.77%	24.64%	+10.13%

Dividends

VTR vs. 0012.HK - Dividend Comparison

VTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.46%, less than 0012.HK's 8.92% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
0012.HK Henderson Land	4.39%	6.40%	7.63%	7.48%	6.61%	5.42%	5.95%	5.05%	4.75%	3.35%	3.87%	2.56%
VTR Ventas, Inc.	2.46%	2.48%	3.06%	3.61%	4.00%	3.52%	4.37%	5.49%	5.40%	5.19%	4.74%	20.47%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VTR and 0012.HK in my portfolio?

VTR and 0012.HK have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.