VTI vs. VONG
VTI (Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF) and VONG (Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VTI is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Total Market Index, while VONG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VTI returned 14.84%/yr vs 18.32%/yr for VONG. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VTI charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for VONG.
Performance
VTI vs. VONG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VTI achieves a 9.05% return, which is significantly higher than VONG's 4.12% return. Over the past 10 years, VTI has underperformed VONG with an annualized return of 14.84%, while VONG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.32% annualized return.
VTI
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- 0.44%
- YTD
- 9.05%
- 6M
- 8.94%
- 1Y
- 24.96%
- 3Y*
- 21.05%
- 5Y*
- 12.25%
- 10Y*
- 14.84%
VONG
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -0.46%
- YTD
- 4.12%
- 6M
- 3.06%
- 1Y
- 21.24%
- 3Y*
- 23.77%
- 5Y*
- 14.57%
- 10Y*
- 18.32%
VTI vs. VONG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 9.05% | 17.10% | 23.81% | 26.05% | -19.52% | 25.68% | 21.08% | 30.67% | -5.23% | 21.21% |
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF | 4.12% | 18.45% | 33.20% | 42.67% | -29.18% | 27.60% | 38.30% | 36.06% | -1.53% | 30.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between VTI and VONG is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2010 | 0.93 |
The correlation between VTI and VONG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
VTI vs. VONG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VTI
VONG
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Real Estate
Utilities
Basic Materials
Technology
VTI
VONG
Financial Services
VTI
VONG
Communication Services
VTI
VONG
Consumer Cyclical
VTI
VONG
Industrials
VTI
VONG
Healthcare
VTI
VONG
Consumer Defensive
VTI
VONG
Energy
VTI
VONG
Real Estate
VTI
VONG
Utilities
VTI
VONG
Basic Materials
VTI
VONG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VTI vs. VONG — Risk / Return Rank
VTI
VONG
VTI vs. VONG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VTI | VONG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.24 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.81 | 1.31 | +1.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.85 | 4.39 | +8.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VTI | VONG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.02 | 1.36 | +0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | 0.69 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.81 | 0.88 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.89 | -0.38 |
Drawdowns
VTI vs. VONG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VTI drawdown since its inception was -55.45%, which is greater than VONG's maximum drawdown of -32.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTI and VONG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VTI | VONG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.45% | -32.72% | -22.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.92% | -16.23% | +7.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.30% | -23.27% | +3.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.36% | -32.72% | +7.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.00% | -32.72% | -2.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.64% | -4.47% | +1.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.02% | -4.88% | -3.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.95% | 4.85% | -2.90% |
Volatility
VTI vs. VONG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is 3.88%, while Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) has a volatility of 4.78%. This indicates that VTI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VONG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VTI | VONG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.88% | 4.78% | -0.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.55% | 12.08% | -2.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.44% | 15.71% | -3.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.44% | 21.38% | -3.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.33% | 20.90% | -2.57% |
VTI vs. VONG - Expense Ratio Comparison
VTI has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than VONG's 0.06% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VTI vs. VONG - Dividend Comparison
VTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, more than VONG's 0.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF | 0.44% | 0.45% | 0.55% | 0.71% | 0.98% | 0.58% | 0.77% | 1.03% | 1.18% | 1.19% | 1.48% | 1.47% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 1.03% | 1.12% | 1.27% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.21% | 1.42% | 1.78% | 2.04% | 1.71% | 1.92% | 1.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, VTI and VONG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VONG has higher volatility (4.78%) compared to VTI (3.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTI dropped -55.45% vs VONG's -32.72%.
On 10-year performance, VONG leads with 18.32% vs 14.84% for VTI. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VTI has been the lower-risk option at 3.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VONG has performed better with a 18.32% return vs 14.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for VONG.
VTI has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.44% for VONG.
VTI is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while VONG is Large Cap Growth Equities. VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index, while VONG tracks Russell 1000 Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VTI and 0.06% for VONG.
VTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VTI and VONG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer