PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
VTI vs. VAPX.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

VTI vs. VAPX.L

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

VTI (Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF) and VAPX.L (Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing) are both exchange-traded funds - VTI is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Total Market Index, while VAPX.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI AC Asia Pac Ex JPN NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VTI returned 14.84%/yr vs 11.74%/yr for VAPX.L. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VTI charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for VAPX.L.

Performance

VTI vs. VAPX.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing (VAPX.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VTI is traded in USD, while VAPX.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VAPX.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTI achieves a 9.05% return, which is significantly lower than VAPX.L's 39.58% return. Over the past 10 years, VTI has outperformed VAPX.L with an annualized return of 14.84%, while VAPX.L has yielded a comparatively lower 11.74% annualized return.

VTI

1D
0.30%
1M
0.44%
YTD
9.05%
6M
8.94%
1Y
24.96%
3Y*
21.05%
5Y*
12.25%
10Y*
14.84%

VAPX.L

1D
0.35%
1M
-2.11%
YTD
39.58%
6M
44.97%
1Y
70.32%
3Y*
25.08%
5Y*
10.60%
10Y*
11.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTI vs. VAPX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF		9.05%17.10%23.81%26.05%-19.52%25.68%21.08%30.67%-5.23%21.21%
VAPX.L
Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing		39.58%41.25%-5.11%9.37%-12.16%0.91%18.84%17.37%-14.69%31.84%

Correlation

The correlation between VTI and VAPX.L is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2013

0.53

The correlation between VTI and VAPX.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

VTI vs. VAPX.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
VTI
VAPX.L

Technology

33.5%
30.2%

Financial Services

12.0%
25.3%

Communication Services

10.3%
2.4%

Consumer Cyclical

10.0%
5.3%

Industrials

9.8%
12.5%

Healthcare

9.2%
3.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
2.5%

Energy

3.7%
2.3%

Real Estate

2.4%
4.9%

Utilities

2.3%
2.0%

Basic Materials

2.0%
9.5%

Technology

VTI
33.5%
VAPX.L
30.2%

Financial Services

VTI
12.0%
VAPX.L
25.3%

Communication Services

VTI
10.3%
VAPX.L
2.4%

Consumer Cyclical

VTI
10.0%
VAPX.L
5.3%

Industrials

VTI
9.8%
VAPX.L
12.5%

Healthcare

VTI
9.2%
VAPX.L
3.3%

Consumer Defensive

VTI
4.7%
VAPX.L
2.5%

Energy

VTI
3.7%
VAPX.L
2.3%

Real Estate

VTI
2.4%
VAPX.L
4.9%

Utilities

VTI
2.3%
VAPX.L
2.0%

Basic Materials

VTI
2.0%
VAPX.L
9.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF

Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing

Often compared with VTI:
VTI vs. VOOVTI vs. VXUSVTI vs. SPYVTI vs. VTVTI vs. SCHDVTI vs. FZROXVTI vs. QQQ
Often compared with VAPX.L:
VAPX.L vs. HMXJ.LVAPX.L vs. VFEG.LVAPX.L vs. V3PA.DEVAPX.L vs. EIXVAPX.L vs. INAA.LVAPX.L vs. VTVAPX.L vs. SPHD

Return for Risk

VTI vs. VAPX.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
VTI
VTI Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
VTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTI Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
VTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTI Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
VAPX.L
VAPX.L Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
VAPX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VAPX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
VAPX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
VAPX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
VAPX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTI vs. VAPX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing (VAPX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

VTIVAPX.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.02
3.02

-1.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.73
3.68

-0.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.54

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.81

4.63

-1.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.85

17.93

-5.08

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VTI vs. VAPX.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTI Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is lower than the VAPX.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTI and VAPX.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

VTIVAPX.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.02

3.02

-1.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.55

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

0.61

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.43

+0.07

Drawdowns

VTI vs. VAPX.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTI drawdown since its inception was -55.45%, which is greater than VAPX.L's maximum drawdown of -38.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTI and VAPX.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

VTIVAPX.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.45%

-38.96%

-16.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.92%

-15.09%

+6.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.30%

-20.38%

+1.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.36%

-31.90%

+6.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.00%

-38.96%

+3.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.64%

-9.65%

+7.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.02%

-10.17%

+2.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.95%

3.91%

-1.96%

Volatility

VTI vs. VAPX.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is 3.88%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing (VAPX.L) has a volatility of 12.47%. This indicates that VTI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VAPX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

VTIVAPX.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.88%

12.47%

-8.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.55%

20.85%

-11.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.44%

23.25%

-10.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.44%

19.18%

-1.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.33%

19.32%

-0.99%

VTI vs. VAPX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTI has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than VAPX.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

VTI vs. VAPX.L - Dividend Comparison

VTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than VAPX.L's 1.91% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VAPX.L
Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing		1.91%2.70%3.47%3.53%4.32%3.51%2.08%3.39%3.52%3.10%2.71%3.49%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF		1.03%1.12%1.27%1.44%1.66%1.21%1.42%1.78%2.04%1.71%1.92%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions

VTI and VAPX.L have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for VAPX.L.

VTI is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while VAPX.L is Asia Pacific Equities. VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index, while VAPX.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Pac Ex JPN NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VTI and 0.15% for VAPX.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTI and VAPX.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer