PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTI vs. TMFC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VTI vs. TMFC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) and Motley Fool 100 Index ETF (TMFC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTI achieves a 9.05% return, which is significantly higher than TMFC's 5.68% return.


VTI

1D
0.30%
1M
0.44%
YTD
9.05%
6M
8.94%
1Y
24.96%
3Y*
21.05%
5Y*
12.25%
10Y*
14.84%

TMFC

1D
0.28%
1M
-1.58%
YTD
5.68%
6M
5.24%
1Y
22.16%
3Y*
25.12%
5Y*
15.26%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTI vs. TMFC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
9.05%17.10%23.81%26.05%-19.52%25.68%21.08%30.67%-10.85%
TMFC
Motley Fool 100 Index ETF
5.68%19.55%35.17%47.04%-30.86%25.30%42.00%34.70%-5.85%

Correlation

The correlation between VTI and TMFC is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2018

0.91

The correlation between VTI and TMFC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

VTI vs. TMFC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VTI
TMFC

Technology

33.5%
41.4%

Financial Services

12.0%
12.9%

Communication Services

10.3%
17.4%

Consumer Cyclical

10.0%
11.4%

Industrials

9.8%
4.0%

Healthcare

9.2%
4.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
4.3%

Energy

3.7%
1.9%

Real Estate

2.4%
0.9%

Utilities

2.3%
0.5%

Basic Materials

2.0%
0.6%

Technology

VTI
33.5%
TMFC
41.4%

Financial Services

VTI
12.0%
TMFC
12.9%

Communication Services

VTI
10.3%
TMFC
17.4%

Consumer Cyclical

VTI
10.0%
TMFC
11.4%

Industrials

VTI
9.8%
TMFC
4.0%

Healthcare

VTI
9.2%
TMFC
4.8%

Consumer Defensive

VTI
4.7%
TMFC
4.3%

Energy

VTI
3.7%
TMFC
1.9%

Real Estate

VTI
2.4%
TMFC
0.9%

Utilities

VTI
2.3%
TMFC
0.5%

Basic Materials

VTI
2.0%
TMFC
0.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTI vs. TMFC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTI
VTI Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
VTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTI Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
VTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTI Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

TMFC
TMFC Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
TMFC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMFC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMFC Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
TMFC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMFC Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTI vs. TMFC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) and Motley Fool 100 Index ETF (TMFC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VTITMFCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.29

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.81

1.76

+1.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.85

6.53

+6.32

VTI vs. TMFC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTI Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is comparable to the TMFC Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTI and TMFC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VTITMFCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.02

1.61

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.75

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.81

-0.31

Drawdowns

VTI vs. TMFC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTI drawdown since its inception was -55.45%, which is greater than TMFC's maximum drawdown of -33.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTI and TMFC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTITMFCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.45%

-33.06%

-22.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.92%

-12.64%

+3.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.30%

-20.06%

+0.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.36%

-33.06%

+7.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.64%

-3.62%

+0.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.02%

-6.77%

-1.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.95%

3.40%

-1.45%

Volatility

VTI vs. TMFC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is 3.88%, while Motley Fool 100 Index ETF (TMFC) has a volatility of 4.14%. This indicates that VTI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TMFC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTITMFCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.88%

4.14%

-0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.55%

10.56%

-1.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.44%

13.82%

-1.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.44%

20.41%

-2.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.33%

22.00%

-3.67%

VTI vs. TMFC - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTI has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than TMFC's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

VTI vs. TMFC - Dividend Comparison

VTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, more than TMFC's 0.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TMFC
Motley Fool 100 Index ETF
0.14%0.14%0.40%0.26%0.27%0.23%0.42%0.50%0.61%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
1.03%1.12%1.27%1.44%1.66%1.21%1.42%1.78%2.04%1.71%1.92%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, VTI and TMFC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TMFC has higher volatility (4.14%) compared to VTI (3.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTI dropped -55.45% vs TMFC's -33.06%.

On 5-year performance, TMFC leads with 15.26% vs 12.25% for VTI. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VTI has been the lower-risk option at 3.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, TMFC has performed better with a 15.26% return vs 12.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for TMFC.

VTI has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.14% for TMFC.

VTI is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while TMFC is Large Cap Growth Equities. VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index, while TMFC tracks Motley Fool 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Motley Fool. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VTI and 0.50% for TMFC.

VTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTI and TMFC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer