VTI vs. RSPN

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

VTI (Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF) and RSPN (Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VTI is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Total Market Index, while RSPN is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VTI returned 14.84%/yr vs 14.32%/yr for RSPN. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VTI charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for RSPN.

Performance

VTI vs. RSPN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) and Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF (RSPN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTI achieves a 9.05% return, which is significantly higher than RSPN's 8.05% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VTI having a 14.84% annualized return and RSPN not far behind at 14.32%.

VTI

• 1D: 0.30%
• 1M: 0.44%
• YTD: 9.05%
• 6M: 8.94%
• 1Y: 24.96%
• 3Y*: 21.05%
• 5Y*: 12.25%
• 10Y*: 14.84%

RSPN

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: 0.51%
• YTD: 8.05%
• 6M: 8.82%
• 1Y: 16.31%
• 3Y*: 17.91%
• 5Y*: 11.25%
• 10Y*: 14.32%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTI vs. RSPN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF	9.05%	17.10%	23.81%	26.05%	-19.52%	25.68%	21.08%	30.67%	-5.23%	21.21%
RSPN Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF	8.05%	13.84%	17.63%	22.32%	-8.79%	26.07%	18.07%	33.17%	-13.23%	23.22%

Correlation

The correlation between VTI and RSPN is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.70
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.78
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.83
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2006	0.78

The correlation between VTI and RSPN shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.83 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VTI vs. RSPN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VTI	RSPN
Technology	33.5%	4.2%
Financial Services	12.0%	0.0%
Communication Services	10.3%	-
Consumer Cyclical	10.0%	2.5%
Industrials	9.8%	91.8%
Healthcare	9.2%	-
Consumer Defensive	4.7%	-
Energy	3.7%	-
Real Estate	2.4%	-
Utilities	2.3%	1.5%
Basic Materials	2.0%	-

Return for Risk

VTI vs. RSPN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTI

VTI Risk / Return Rank: 68
VTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
VTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
VTI Omega Ratio Rank: 68
VTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
VTI Martin Ratio Rank: 75

RSPN

RSPN Risk / Return Rank: 32
RSPN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
RSPN Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
RSPN Omega Ratio Rank: 30
RSPN Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
RSPN Martin Ratio Rank: 33

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTI vs. RSPN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) and Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF (RSPN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VTI	RSPN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.02	1.07	+0.95
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.73	1.62	+1.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.19	+0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.81	1.33	+1.49
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.85	4.58	+8.26
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VTI vs. RSPN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTI Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is higher than the RSPN Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTI and RSPN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VTI	RSPN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.02	1.07	+0.95
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.71	0.62	+0.08
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.81	0.71	+0.11
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.50	0.53	-0.02

Drawdowns

VTI vs. RSPN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTI drawdown since its inception was -55.45%, smaller than the maximum RSPN drawdown of -59.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTI and RSPN.

Drawdown Indicators

	VTI	RSPN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.45%	-59.61%	+4.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.92%	-12.36%	+3.44%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.30%	-20.89%	+1.59%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.36%	-21.88%	-3.48%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.00%	-42.02%	+7.02%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.64%	-4.29%	+1.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.02%	-7.67%	-0.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.95%	3.57%	-1.62%

Volatility

VTI vs. RSPN - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) has a higher volatility of 3.88% compared to Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF (RSPN) at 3.63%. This indicates that VTI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSPN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VTI	RSPN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.88%	3.63%	+0.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.55%	12.15%	-2.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.44%	15.39%	-2.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.44%	18.18%	-0.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.33%	20.36%	-2.03%

VTI vs. RSPN - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTI has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than RSPN's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

VTI vs. RSPN - Dividend Comparison

VTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, more than RSPN's 0.81% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RSPN Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF	0.81%	0.86%	0.98%	1.06%	1.09%	0.70%	0.96%	1.33%	1.49%	1.12%	1.31%	1.51%
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF	1.03%	1.12%	1.27%	1.44%	1.66%	1.21%	1.42%	1.78%	2.04%	1.71%	1.92%	1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VTI and RSPN in my portfolio?

VTI and RSPN have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VTI or RSPN?

VTI has higher volatility (3.88%) compared to RSPN (3.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTI dropped -55.45% vs RSPN's -59.61%.

Which ETF is better, VTI or RSPN?

On 10-year performance, VTI leads with 14.84% vs 14.32% for RSPN. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, RSPN has been the lower-risk option at 3.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VTI or RSPN?

Over the 10-year period, VTI has performed better with a 14.84% return vs 14.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VTI or RSPN?

VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VTI or RSPN?

VTI has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.81% for RSPN.

What is the main difference between VTI and RSPN?

VTI is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while RSPN is Industrials Equities. VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index, while RSPN tracks S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VTI and 0.40% for RSPN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.