PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTI vs. L100.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VTI vs. L100.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) and Lyxor FTSE 100 UCITS ETF - Acc (L100.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VTI is traded in USD, while L100.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the L100.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTI achieves a 9.05% return, which is significantly higher than L100.L's 5.25% return. Over the past 10 years, VTI has outperformed L100.L with an annualized return of 14.84%, while L100.L has yielded a comparatively lower 8.56% annualized return.


VTI

1D
0.30%
1M
0.44%
YTD
9.05%
6M
8.94%
1Y
24.96%
3Y*
21.05%
5Y*
12.25%
10Y*
14.84%

L100.L

1D
0.04%
1M
-0.49%
YTD
5.25%
6M
9.44%
1Y
19.37%
3Y*
17.27%
5Y*
10.52%
10Y*
8.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTI vs. L100.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
9.05%17.10%23.81%26.05%-19.52%25.68%21.08%30.67%-5.23%21.21%
L100.L
Lyxor FTSE 100 UCITS ETF - Acc
5.25%35.31%7.47%13.03%-6.35%16.85%-9.09%22.11%-14.28%22.76%

Correlation

The correlation between VTI and L100.L is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2008

0.52

The correlation between VTI and L100.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

VTI vs. L100.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VTI
L100.L

Technology

33.5%
0.8%

Financial Services

12.0%
24.5%

Communication Services

10.3%
2.6%

Consumer Cyclical

10.0%
4.7%

Industrials

9.8%
13.7%

Healthcare

9.2%
13.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
13.9%

Energy

3.7%
11.7%

Real Estate

2.4%
0.9%

Utilities

2.3%
5.3%

Basic Materials

2.0%
8.5%

Technology

VTI
33.5%
L100.L
0.8%

Financial Services

VTI
12.0%
L100.L
24.5%

Communication Services

VTI
10.3%
L100.L
2.6%

Consumer Cyclical

VTI
10.0%
L100.L
4.7%

Industrials

VTI
9.8%
L100.L
13.7%

Healthcare

VTI
9.2%
L100.L
13.6%

Consumer Defensive

VTI
4.7%
L100.L
13.9%

Energy

VTI
3.7%
L100.L
11.7%

Real Estate

VTI
2.4%
L100.L
0.9%

Utilities

VTI
2.3%
L100.L
5.3%

Basic Materials

VTI
2.0%
L100.L
8.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTI vs. L100.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTI
VTI Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
VTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTI Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
VTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTI Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

L100.L
L100.L Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
L100.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
L100.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
L100.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
L100.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
L100.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTI vs. L100.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) and Lyxor FTSE 100 UCITS ETF - Acc (L100.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VTIL100.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.26

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.81

1.98

+0.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.85

6.66

+6.18

VTI vs. L100.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTI Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is higher than the L100.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTI and L100.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VTIL100.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.02

1.44

+0.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.64

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

0.47

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.18

+0.33

Drawdowns

VTI vs. L100.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTI drawdown since its inception was -55.45%, smaller than the maximum L100.L drawdown of -60.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTI and L100.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTIL100.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.45%

-60.70%

+5.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.92%

-9.73%

+0.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.30%

-13.73%

-5.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.36%

-26.01%

+0.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.00%

-42.27%

+7.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.64%

-4.83%

+2.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.02%

-14.16%

+6.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.95%

2.90%

-0.95%

Volatility

VTI vs. L100.L - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) and Lyxor FTSE 100 UCITS ETF - Acc (L100.L) have volatilities of 3.88% and 3.86%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTIL100.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.88%

3.86%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.55%

11.26%

-1.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.44%

13.41%

-0.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.44%

16.56%

+0.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.33%

18.32%

+0.01%

VTI vs. L100.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTI has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than L100.L's 0.14% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VTI vs. L100.L - Dividend Comparison

VTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, while L100.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
L100.L
Lyxor FTSE 100 UCITS ETF - Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
1.03%1.12%1.27%1.44%1.66%1.21%1.42%1.78%2.04%1.71%1.92%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


VTI and L100.L have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for L100.L.

VTI is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while L100.L is Europe Equities. VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index, while L100.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VTI and 0.14% for L100.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTI and L100.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer