VTI vs. EDEN
VTI (Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF) and EDEN (iShares MSCI Denmark ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VTI is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Total Market Index, while EDEN is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Denmark IMI 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VTI returned 14.84%/yr vs 8.44%/yr for EDEN. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VTI charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.53%/yr for EDEN.
Performance
VTI vs. EDEN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VTI achieves a 9.05% return, which is significantly higher than EDEN's -5.83% return. Over the past 10 years, VTI has outperformed EDEN with an annualized return of 14.84%, while EDEN has yielded a comparatively lower 8.44% annualized return.
VTI
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- 0.44%
- YTD
- 9.05%
- 6M
- 8.94%
- 1Y
- 24.96%
- 3Y*
- 21.05%
- 5Y*
- 12.25%
- 10Y*
- 14.84%
EDEN
- 1D
- -1.08%
- 1M
- -3.88%
- YTD
- -5.83%
- 6M
- -2.08%
- 1Y
- -6.41%
- 3Y*
- 2.17%
- 5Y*
- 1.47%
- 10Y*
- 8.44%
VTI vs. EDEN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 9.05% | 17.10% | 23.81% | 26.05% | -19.52% | 25.68% | 21.08% | 30.67% | -5.23% | 21.21% |
EDEN iShares MSCI Denmark ETF | -5.83% | 10.58% | -3.94% | 17.99% | -11.47% | 14.81% | 42.56% | 24.37% | -14.43% | 35.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between VTI and EDEN is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2012 | 0.58 |
The correlation between VTI and EDEN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.
VTI vs. EDEN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VTI
EDEN
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Real Estate
-
Utilities
Basic Materials
Technology
VTI
EDEN
Financial Services
VTI
EDEN
Communication Services
VTI
EDEN
-
Consumer Cyclical
VTI
EDEN
Industrials
VTI
EDEN
Healthcare
VTI
EDEN
Consumer Defensive
VTI
EDEN
Energy
VTI
EDEN
Real Estate
VTI
EDEN
-
Utilities
VTI
EDEN
Basic Materials
VTI
EDEN
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VTI vs. EDEN — Risk / Return Rank
VTI
EDEN
VTI vs. EDEN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) and iShares MSCI Denmark ETF (EDEN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VTI | EDEN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 0.96 | +0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.81 | -0.30 | +3.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.85 | -0.63 | +13.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VTI | EDEN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.02 | -0.31 | +2.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | 0.07 | +0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.81 | 0.44 | +0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.63 | -0.13 |
Drawdowns
VTI vs. EDEN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VTI drawdown since its inception was -55.45%, which is greater than EDEN's maximum drawdown of -36.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTI and EDEN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VTI | EDEN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.45% | -36.61% | -18.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.92% | -21.17% | +12.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.30% | -29.31% | +10.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.36% | -36.61% | +11.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.00% | -36.61% | +1.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.64% | -16.04% | +13.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.02% | -7.37% | -0.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.95% | 10.14% | -8.19% |
Volatility
VTI vs. EDEN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is 3.88%, while iShares MSCI Denmark ETF (EDEN) has a volatility of 4.45%. This indicates that VTI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EDEN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VTI | EDEN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.88% | 4.45% | -0.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.55% | 15.77% | -6.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.44% | 20.91% | -8.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.44% | 20.23% | -2.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.33% | 19.44% | -1.11% |
VTI vs. EDEN - Expense Ratio Comparison
VTI has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than EDEN's 0.53% expense ratio.
Dividends
VTI vs. EDEN - Dividend Comparison
VTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than EDEN's 2.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDEN iShares MSCI Denmark ETF | 2.96% | 2.79% | 1.50% | 1.92% | 1.47% | 0.74% | 0.42% | 2.36% | 2.01% | 2.03% | 1.28% | 1.46% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 1.03% | 1.12% | 1.27% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.21% | 1.42% | 1.78% | 2.04% | 1.71% | 1.92% | 1.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VTI and EDEN have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EDEN has higher volatility (4.45%) compared to VTI (3.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTI dropped -55.45% vs EDEN's -36.61%.
On 10-year performance, VTI leads with 14.84% vs 8.44% for EDEN. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VTI has been the lower-risk option at 3.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VTI has performed better with a 14.84% return vs 8.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.53% for EDEN.
EDEN has the higher dividend yield at 2.96%, compared with 1.03% for VTI.
VTI is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while EDEN is Europe Equities. VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index, while EDEN tracks MSCI Denmark IMI 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VTI and 0.53% for EDEN.
VTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs -0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VTI and EDEN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer