VT vs. WOSC.L
VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) and WOSC.L (SPDR MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF) are both Global Equities funds - VT tracks the FTSE Global All Cap Index while WOSC.L tracks the MSCI ACWI SMID NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VT returned 12.61%/yr vs 10.03%/yr for WOSC.L. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VT charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for WOSC.L.
Performance
VT vs. WOSC.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
VT is traded in USD, while WOSC.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the WOSC.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VT achieves a 9.77% return, which is significantly lower than WOSC.L's 12.05% return. Over the past 10 years, VT has outperformed WOSC.L with an annualized return of 12.61%, while WOSC.L has yielded a comparatively lower 10.03% annualized return.
VT
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- -0.45%
- YTD
- 9.77%
- 6M
- 10.59%
- 1Y
- 25.47%
- 3Y*
- 19.82%
- 5Y*
- 10.54%
- 10Y*
- 12.61%
WOSC.L
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- -0.13%
- YTD
- 12.05%
- 6M
- 13.40%
- 1Y
- 29.38%
- 3Y*
- 16.44%
- 5Y*
- 6.24%
- 10Y*
- 10.03%
VT vs. WOSC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 9.77% | 22.43% | 16.49% | 22.02% | -18.00% | 18.27% | 16.59% | 26.81% | -9.76% | 24.50% |
WOSC.L SPDR MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF | 12.05% | 20.20% | 7.59% | 15.76% | -18.52% | 15.21% | 15.67% | 26.98% | -14.73% | 21.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between VT and WOSC.L is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2013 | 0.63 |
The correlation between VT and WOSC.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
VT vs. WOSC.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VT
WOSC.L
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
VT
WOSC.L
Financial Services
VT
WOSC.L
Industrials
VT
WOSC.L
Consumer Cyclical
VT
WOSC.L
Communication Services
VT
WOSC.L
Healthcare
VT
WOSC.L
Consumer Defensive
VT
WOSC.L
Energy
VT
WOSC.L
Basic Materials
VT
WOSC.L
Utilities
VT
WOSC.L
Real Estate
VT
WOSC.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VT vs. WOSC.L — Risk / Return Rank
VT
WOSC.L
VT vs. WOSC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) and SPDR MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF (WOSC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VT | WOSC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.35 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.64 | 3.24 | -0.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.68 | 11.74 | -0.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VT | WOSC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.96 | 2.04 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 | 0.28 | +0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 | 0.42 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.19 | +0.24 |
Drawdowns
VT vs. WOSC.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VT drawdown since its inception was -50.27%, which is greater than WOSC.L's maximum drawdown of -45.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VT and WOSC.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VT | WOSC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.27% | -45.31% | -4.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.67% | -9.03% | -0.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.51% | -20.19% | +3.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.38% | -31.13% | +4.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.24% | -42.76% | +8.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.06% | -1.69% | -1.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.02% | -17.50% | +10.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.19% | 2.50% | -0.31% |
Volatility
VT vs. WOSC.L - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) has a higher volatility of 4.55% compared to SPDR MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF (WOSC.L) at 4.22%. This indicates that VT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WOSC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VT | WOSC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.55% | 4.22% | +0.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.67% | 10.67% | 0.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.10% | 14.33% | -1.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.10% | 22.19% | -6.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.26% | 23.94% | -6.68% |
VT vs. WOSC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
VT has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than WOSC.L's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
VT vs. WOSC.L - Dividend Comparison
VT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, while WOSC.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 1.63% | 1.82% | 1.95% | 2.08% | 2.20% | 1.82% | 1.66% | 2.32% | 2.53% | 2.11% | 2.39% | 2.45% |
WOSC.L SPDR MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VT and WOSC.L have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VT is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VT is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for WOSC.L.
VT tracks FTSE Global All Cap Index, while WOSC.L tracks MSCI ACWI SMID NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for VT and 0.45% for WOSC.L.
Find the right allocation for VT and WOSC.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer