PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VT vs. VWO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VT vs. VWO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VT achieves a 9.77% return, which is significantly higher than VWO's 8.50% return. Over the past 10 years, VT has outperformed VWO with an annualized return of 12.61%, while VWO has yielded a comparatively lower 8.60% annualized return.


VT

1D
0.52%
1M
-0.45%
YTD
9.77%
6M
10.59%
1Y
25.47%
3Y*
19.82%
5Y*
10.54%
10Y*
12.61%

VWO

1D
0.52%
1M
-3.65%
YTD
8.50%
6M
9.73%
1Y
24.29%
3Y*
16.22%
5Y*
4.65%
10Y*
8.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VT vs. VWO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
9.77%22.43%16.49%22.02%-18.00%18.27%16.59%26.81%-9.76%24.50%
VWO
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF
8.50%25.60%10.59%9.25%-17.98%1.26%15.17%20.75%-14.76%31.49%

Correlation

The correlation between VT and VWO is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2008

0.83

The correlation between VT and VWO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

VT vs. VWO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VT
VWO

Technology

27.8%
29.6%

Financial Services

15.9%
19.5%

Industrials

12.0%
8.0%

Consumer Cyclical

9.5%
10.7%

Communication Services

8.3%
7.1%

Healthcare

8.1%
3.9%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
3.7%

Energy

4.3%
4.6%

Basic Materials

4.2%
8.0%

Utilities

2.7%
2.9%

Real Estate

2.4%
2.2%

Technology

VT
27.8%
VWO
29.6%

Financial Services

VT
15.9%
VWO
19.5%

Industrials

VT
12.0%
VWO
8.0%

Consumer Cyclical

VT
9.5%
VWO
10.7%

Communication Services

VT
8.3%
VWO
7.1%

Healthcare

VT
8.1%
VWO
3.9%

Consumer Defensive

VT
4.8%
VWO
3.7%

Energy

VT
4.3%
VWO
4.6%

Basic Materials

VT
4.2%
VWO
8.0%

Utilities

VT
2.7%
VWO
2.9%

Real Estate

VT
2.4%
VWO
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VT vs. VWO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VT
VT Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
VT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
VT Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
VT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
VT Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

VWO
VWO Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
VWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWO Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
VWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWO Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VT vs. VWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VTVWODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.28

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.64

2.18

+0.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.68

7.79

+3.88

VT vs. VWO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VT Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is higher than the VWO Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VT and VWO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VTVWODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.96

1.49

+0.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.27

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

0.45

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.26

+0.17

Drawdowns

VT vs. VWO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VT drawdown since its inception was -50.27%, smaller than the maximum VWO drawdown of -67.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VT and VWO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTVWODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.27%

-67.68%

+17.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.67%

-11.17%

+1.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.51%

-17.37%

+0.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.38%

-32.60%

+6.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.24%

-36.39%

+2.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.06%

-4.67%

+1.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.02%

-15.81%

+8.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.19%

3.12%

-0.93%

Volatility

VT vs. VWO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) is 4.55%, while Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) has a volatility of 6.29%. This indicates that VT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTVWODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.55%

6.29%

-1.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.67%

13.80%

-3.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.10%

16.37%

-3.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.10%

17.45%

-1.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.26%

19.23%

-1.97%

VT vs. VWO - Expense Ratio Comparison

VT has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than VWO's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VT vs. VWO - Dividend Comparison

VT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, less than VWO's 2.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
1.63%1.82%1.95%2.08%2.20%1.82%1.66%2.32%2.53%2.11%2.39%2.45%
VWO
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF
2.49%2.79%3.20%3.52%4.11%2.63%1.91%3.23%2.88%2.30%2.52%3.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


VT and VWO have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VWO has higher volatility (6.29%) compared to VT (4.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VT dropped -50.27% vs VWO's -67.68%.

On 10-year performance, VT leads with 12.61% vs 8.60% for VWO. On fees, VT is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, VT has been the lower-risk option at 4.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VT has performed better with a 12.61% return vs 8.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VT is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for VWO.

VWO has the higher dividend yield at 2.49%, compared with 1.63% for VT.

VT is categorized as Global Equities, while VWO is Emerging Markets Equities. VT tracks FTSE Global All Cap Index, while VWO tracks FTSE Emerging Index. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for VT and 0.08% for VWO.

VT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VT and VWO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer