PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VT vs. VB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VT vs. VB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VT achieves a 9.77% return, which is significantly lower than VB's 12.60% return. Over the past 10 years, VT has outperformed VB with an annualized return of 12.61%, while VB has yielded a comparatively lower 11.18% annualized return.


VT

1D
0.52%
1M
-0.45%
YTD
9.77%
6M
10.59%
1Y
25.47%
3Y*
19.82%
5Y*
10.54%
10Y*
12.61%

VB

1D
0.40%
1M
0.41%
YTD
12.60%
6M
12.39%
1Y
25.97%
3Y*
15.91%
5Y*
6.58%
10Y*
11.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VT vs. VB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
9.77%22.43%16.49%22.02%-18.00%18.27%16.59%26.81%-9.76%24.50%
VB
Vanguard Small-Cap ETF
12.60%8.87%14.17%18.22%-17.51%17.57%19.19%27.34%-9.34%16.26%

Correlation

The correlation between VT and VB is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2008

0.87

The correlation between VT and VB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

VT vs. VB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VT
VB

Technology

27.8%
17.2%

Financial Services

15.9%
12.6%

Industrials

12.0%
20.8%

Consumer Cyclical

9.5%
11.3%

Communication Services

8.3%
3.1%

Healthcare

8.1%
11.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
3.4%

Energy

4.3%
4.7%

Basic Materials

4.2%
4.8%

Utilities

2.7%
3.3%

Real Estate

2.4%
7.6%

Technology

VT
27.8%
VB
17.2%

Financial Services

VT
15.9%
VB
12.6%

Industrials

VT
12.0%
VB
20.8%

Consumer Cyclical

VT
9.5%
VB
11.3%

Communication Services

VT
8.3%
VB
3.1%

Healthcare

VT
8.1%
VB
11.1%

Consumer Defensive

VT
4.8%
VB
3.4%

Energy

VT
4.3%
VB
4.7%

Basic Materials

VT
4.2%
VB
4.8%

Utilities

VT
2.7%
VB
3.3%

Real Estate

VT
2.4%
VB
7.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VT vs. VB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VT
VT Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
VT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
VT Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
VT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
VT Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

VB
VB Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
VB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
VB Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
VB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
VB Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VT vs. VB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VTVBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.28

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.64

2.91

-0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.68

10.66

+1.01

VT vs. VB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VT Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is comparable to the VB Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VT and VB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VTVBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.96

1.59

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.32

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

0.52

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.44

-0.01

Drawdowns

VT vs. VB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VT drawdown since its inception was -50.27%, smaller than the maximum VB drawdown of -59.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VT and VB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTVBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.27%

-59.56%

+9.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.67%

-8.98%

-0.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.51%

-25.36%

+8.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.38%

-28.15%

+1.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.24%

-42.05%

+7.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.06%

-2.04%

-1.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.02%

-8.43%

+1.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.19%

2.44%

-0.25%

Volatility

VT vs. VB - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) have volatilities of 4.55% and 4.62%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTVBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.55%

4.62%

-0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.67%

11.97%

-1.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.10%

16.45%

-3.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.10%

20.77%

-4.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.26%

21.44%

-4.18%

VT vs. VB - Expense Ratio Comparison

VT has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than VB's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VT vs. VB - Dividend Comparison

VT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, more than VB's 1.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VB
Vanguard Small-Cap ETF
1.21%1.33%1.30%1.55%1.59%1.24%1.14%1.39%1.67%1.35%1.50%1.48%
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
1.63%1.82%1.95%2.08%2.20%1.82%1.66%2.32%2.53%2.11%2.39%2.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


VT and VB have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VB has higher volatility (4.62%) compared to VT (4.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VT dropped -50.27% vs VB's -59.56%.

On 10-year performance, VT leads with 12.61% vs 11.18% for VB. On fees, VB is cheaper at 0.05% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VT has performed better with a 12.61% return vs 11.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VB is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for VT.

VT has the higher dividend yield at 1.63%, compared with 1.21% for VB.

VT is categorized as Global Equities, while VB is Small Cap Blend Equities. VT tracks FTSE Global All Cap Index, while VB tracks CRSP US Small Cap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for VT and 0.05% for VB.

VT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VT and VB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer