PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VT vs. SDY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VT vs. SDY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) and SPDR S&P Dividend ETF (SDY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VT achieves a 9.77% return, which is significantly higher than SDY's 7.58% return. Over the past 10 years, VT has outperformed SDY with an annualized return of 12.61%, while SDY has yielded a comparatively lower 9.24% annualized return.


VT

1D
0.52%
1M
-0.45%
YTD
9.77%
6M
10.59%
1Y
25.47%
3Y*
19.82%
5Y*
10.54%
10Y*
12.61%

SDY

1D
-0.75%
1M
0.53%
YTD
7.58%
6M
8.73%
1Y
13.00%
3Y*
9.44%
5Y*
6.08%
10Y*
9.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VT vs. SDY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
9.77%22.43%16.49%22.02%-18.00%18.27%16.59%26.81%-9.76%24.50%
SDY
SPDR S&P Dividend ETF
7.58%8.18%8.45%2.61%-0.54%25.32%1.71%23.29%-2.74%15.82%

Correlation

The correlation between VT and SDY is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2008

0.81

Over the past year, the correlation between VT and SDY has dropped to 0.47 - well below their long-term average of 0.81, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

VT vs. SDY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VT
SDY

Technology

27.8%
8.7%

Financial Services

15.9%
11.5%

Industrials

12.0%
17.5%

Consumer Cyclical

9.5%
5.2%

Communication Services

8.3%
3.5%

Healthcare

8.1%
6.2%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
17.1%

Energy

4.3%
4.6%

Basic Materials

4.2%
6.4%

Utilities

2.7%
14.8%

Real Estate

2.4%
4.6%

Technology

VT
27.8%
SDY
8.7%

Financial Services

VT
15.9%
SDY
11.5%

Industrials

VT
12.0%
SDY
17.5%

Consumer Cyclical

VT
9.5%
SDY
5.2%

Communication Services

VT
8.3%
SDY
3.5%

Healthcare

VT
8.1%
SDY
6.2%

Consumer Defensive

VT
4.8%
SDY
17.1%

Energy

VT
4.3%
SDY
4.6%

Basic Materials

VT
4.2%
SDY
6.4%

Utilities

VT
2.7%
SDY
14.8%

Real Estate

VT
2.4%
SDY
4.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VT vs. SDY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VT
VT Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
VT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
VT Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
VT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
VT Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

SDY
SDY Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
SDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDY Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
SDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDY Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VT vs. SDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) and SPDR S&P Dividend ETF (SDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VTSDYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.22

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.64

1.70

+0.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.68

4.63

+7.05

VT vs. SDY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VT Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is higher than the SDY Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VT and SDY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VTSDYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.96

1.26

+0.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.44

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

0.54

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.47

-0.04

Drawdowns

VT vs. SDY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VT drawdown since its inception was -50.27%, smaller than the maximum SDY drawdown of -54.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VT and SDY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTSDYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.27%

-54.75%

+4.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.67%

-7.67%

-2.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.51%

-14.39%

-2.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.38%

-15.21%

-11.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.24%

-36.70%

+2.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.06%

-3.99%

+0.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.02%

-6.21%

-0.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.19%

2.81%

-0.62%

Volatility

VT vs. SDY - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) has a higher volatility of 4.55% compared to SPDR S&P Dividend ETF (SDY) at 2.49%. This indicates that VT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTSDYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.55%

2.49%

+2.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.67%

7.45%

+3.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.10%

10.35%

+2.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.10%

14.03%

+2.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.26%

17.09%

+0.17%

VT vs. SDY - Expense Ratio Comparison

VT has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than SDY's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

VT vs. SDY - Dividend Comparison

VT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, less than SDY's 2.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SDY
SPDR S&P Dividend ETF
2.48%2.61%2.56%2.64%2.55%2.63%2.85%2.45%2.73%4.69%3.30%6.20%
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
1.63%1.82%1.95%2.08%2.20%1.82%1.66%2.32%2.53%2.11%2.39%2.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


VT and SDY have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VT has higher volatility (4.55%) compared to SDY (2.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VT dropped -50.27% vs SDY's -54.75%.

On 10-year performance, VT leads with 12.61% vs 9.24% for SDY. On fees, VT is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SDY has been the lower-risk option at 2.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VT has performed better with a 12.61% return vs 9.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VT is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SDY.

SDY has the higher dividend yield at 2.48%, compared with 1.63% for VT.

VT is categorized as Global Equities, while SDY is Mid Cap Value Equities. VT tracks FTSE Global All Cap Index, while SDY tracks S&P High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for VT and 0.35% for SDY.

VT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VT and SDY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer