VT vs. IGLN.L
VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) and IGLN.L (iShares Physical Gold ETC) are both exchange-traded funds - VT is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap Index, while IGLN.L is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VT returned 12.61%/yr vs 12.87%/yr for IGLN.L. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VT charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for IGLN.L.
Performance
VT vs. IGLN.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VT achieves a 9.77% return, which is significantly higher than IGLN.L's 0.50% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VT having a 12.61% annualized return and IGLN.L not far ahead at 12.87%.
VT
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- -0.45%
- YTD
- 9.77%
- 6M
- 10.59%
- 1Y
- 25.47%
- 3Y*
- 19.82%
- 5Y*
- 10.54%
- 10Y*
- 12.61%
IGLN.L
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- -8.04%
- YTD
- 0.50%
- 6M
- 3.23%
- 1Y
- 29.84%
- 3Y*
- 30.05%
- 5Y*
- 17.89%
- 10Y*
- 12.87%
VT vs. IGLN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 9.77% | 22.43% | 16.49% | 22.02% | -18.00% | 18.27% | 16.59% | 26.81% | -9.76% | 24.50% |
IGLN.L iShares Physical Gold ETC | 0.50% | 64.93% | 26.14% | 13.44% | -0.09% | -4.03% | 24.16% | 18.30% | -1.33% | 11.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between VT and IGLN.L is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2011 | 0.08 |
Over the past year, VT and IGLN.L have become more correlated (0.29) than their long-term average of 0.08, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VT vs. IGLN.L — Risk / Return Rank
VT
IGLN.L
VT vs. IGLN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (IGLN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VT | IGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.23 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.64 | 1.63 | +1.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.68 | 4.30 | +7.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VT | IGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.96 | 1.19 | +0.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 | 1.03 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 | 0.83 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.44 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
VT vs. IGLN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VT drawdown since its inception was -50.27%, which is greater than IGLN.L's maximum drawdown of -45.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VT and IGLN.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VT | IGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.27% | -45.25% | -5.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.67% | -18.26% | +8.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.51% | -18.26% | +1.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.38% | -21.15% | -5.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.24% | -21.15% | -13.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.06% | -18.26% | +15.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.02% | -19.72% | +12.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.19% | 6.93% | -4.74% |
Volatility
VT vs. IGLN.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) is 4.55%, while iShares Physical Gold ETC (IGLN.L) has a volatility of 6.10%. This indicates that VT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IGLN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VT | IGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.55% | 6.10% | -1.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.67% | 21.87% | -11.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.10% | 24.98% | -11.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.10% | 17.41% | -1.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.26% | 15.56% | +1.70% |
VT vs. IGLN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
VT has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than IGLN.L's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VT vs. IGLN.L - Dividend Comparison
VT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, while IGLN.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGLN.L iShares Physical Gold ETC | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 1.63% | 1.82% | 1.95% | 2.08% | 2.20% | 1.82% | 1.66% | 2.32% | 2.53% | 2.11% | 2.39% | 2.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VT and IGLN.L have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VT is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VT is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for IGLN.L.
VT is categorized as Global Equities, while IGLN.L is Gold. VT tracks FTSE Global All Cap Index, while IGLN.L tracks LBMA Gold Price. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for VT and 0.12% for IGLN.L.
Find the right allocation for VT and IGLN.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer