VT vs. CGMU
VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) and CGMU (Capital Group Municipal Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VT is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap Index, while CGMU is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by Capital Group. VT is passively managed, while CGMU is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, VT returned 19.82%/yr vs 4.67%/yr for CGMU. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VT charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.27%/yr for CGMU.
Performance
VT vs. CGMU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VT achieves a 9.77% return, which is significantly higher than CGMU's 1.46% return.
VT
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- -0.45%
- YTD
- 9.77%
- 6M
- 10.59%
- 1Y
- 25.47%
- 3Y*
- 19.82%
- 5Y*
- 10.54%
- 10Y*
- 12.61%
CGMU
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- YTD
- 1.46%
- 6M
- 2.01%
- 1Y
- 6.88%
- 3Y*
- 4.67%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VT vs. CGMU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 9.77% | 22.43% | 16.49% | 22.02% | 4.39% |
CGMU Capital Group Municipal Income ETF | 1.46% | 5.19% | 2.64% | 6.76% | 4.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between VT and CGMU is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2022 | 0.18 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VT vs. CGMU — Risk / Return Rank
VT
CGMU
VT vs. CGMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) and Capital Group Municipal Income ETF (CGMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VT | CGMU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.65 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.64 | 2.71 | -0.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.68 | 8.76 | +2.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VT | CGMU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.96 | 3.02 | -1.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 1.66 | -1.23 |
Drawdowns
VT vs. CGMU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VT drawdown since its inception was -50.27%, which is greater than CGMU's maximum drawdown of -4.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VT and CGMU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VT | CGMU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.27% | -4.11% | -46.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.67% | -2.55% | -7.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.51% | -3.89% | -12.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.38% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.24% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.06% | -0.82% | -2.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.02% | -0.84% | -6.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.19% | 0.79% | +1.40% |
Volatility
VT vs. CGMU - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) has a higher volatility of 4.55% compared to Capital Group Municipal Income ETF (CGMU) at 0.82%. This indicates that VT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGMU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VT | CGMU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.55% | 0.82% | +3.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.67% | 1.74% | +8.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.10% | 2.29% | +10.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.10% | 3.47% | +12.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.26% | 3.47% | +13.79% |
VT vs. CGMU - Expense Ratio Comparison
VT has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than CGMU's 0.27% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VT vs. CGMU - Dividend Comparison
VT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, less than CGMU's 3.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGMU Capital Group Municipal Income ETF | 3.33% | 3.32% | 3.21% | 3.08% | 0.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 1.63% | 1.82% | 1.95% | 2.08% | 2.20% | 1.82% | 1.66% | 2.32% | 2.53% | 2.11% | 2.39% | 2.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VT and CGMU have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VT has higher volatility (4.55%) compared to CGMU (0.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VT dropped -50.27% vs CGMU's -4.11%.
On 3-year performance, VT leads with 19.82% vs 4.67% for CGMU. On fees, VT is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, CGMU has been the lower-risk option at 0.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, VT has performed better with a 19.82% return vs 4.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VT is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for CGMU.
CGMU has the higher dividend yield at 3.33%, compared with 1.63% for VT.
VT is categorized as Global Equities, while CGMU is Municipal Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Capital Group. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for VT and 0.27% for CGMU.
CGMU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VT and CGMU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer