VRT vs. UFPT

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

VRT (Vertiv Holdings Co.) and UFPT (UFP Technologies, Inc.) are both stocks. VRT operates in Electrical Equipment & Parts (Industrials), while UFPT operates in Medical Devices (Healthcare). Over the past 5 years, VRT returned 62.98%/yr vs 31.64%/yr for UFPT. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

VRT vs. UFPT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) and UFP Technologies, Inc. (UFPT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VRT achieves a 85.57% return, which is significantly higher than UFPT's 2.11% return.

VRT

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: -11.59%
• YTD: 85.57%
• 6M: 61.97%
• 1Y: 160.87%
• 3Y*: 142.34%
• 5Y*: 62.98%
• 10Y*: —

UFPT

• 1D: 1.27%
• 1M: -1.67%
• YTD: 2.11%
• 6M: 5.06%
• 1Y: -4.53%
• 3Y*: 10.66%
• 5Y*: 31.64%
• 10Y*: 26.04%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VRT vs. UFPT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co.	85.57%	42.80%	136.82%	251.81%	-45.25%	33.80%	69.36%	12.55%	1.03%
UFPT UFP Technologies, Inc.	2.11%	-9.19%	42.12%	45.93%	67.79%	50.77%	-6.07%	65.15%	-8.55%

Correlation

The correlation between VRT and UFPT is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.09
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.20
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.26
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2018	0.23

The correlation between VRT and UFPT shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (1 year) to 0.26 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap VRT : $117.86B UFPT : $1.77B
EPS VRT : $3.99 UFPT : $8.81
PE Ratio VRT : 75.41 UFPT : 25.73
PEG Ratio VRT : 0.33 UFPT : 0.48
PS Ratio VRT : 10.84 UFPT : 2.90
PB Ratio VRT : 27.77 UFPT : 4.03
Total Revenue (TTM) VRT : $10.84B UFPT : $608.85M
Gross Profit (TTM) VRT : $3.92B UFPT : $172.62M
EBITDA (TTM) VRT : $2.35B UFPT : $111.39M

Return for Risk

VRT vs. UFPT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VRT

VRT Risk / Return Rank: 93
VRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
VRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
VRT Omega Ratio Rank: 90
VRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
VRT Martin Ratio Rank: 95

UFPT

UFPT Risk / Return Rank: 37
UFPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
UFPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
UFPT Omega Ratio Rank: 35
UFPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
UFPT Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VRT vs. UFPT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) and UFP Technologies, Inc. (UFPT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VRT	UFPT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.79	-0.10	+2.90
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.30	0.16	+3.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.02	+0.39
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.53	-0.15	+6.68
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.20	-0.27	+18.48
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VRT vs. UFPT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VRT Sharpe Ratio is 2.79, which is higher than the UFPT Sharpe Ratio of -0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VRT and UFPT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VRT	UFPT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.79	-0.10	+2.90
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.03	0.72	+0.31
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.66	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.00	0.16	+0.84

Drawdowns

VRT vs. UFPT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VRT drawdown since its inception was -71.24%, smaller than the maximum UFPT drawdown of -88.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VRT and UFPT.

Drawdown Indicators

	VRT	UFPT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-71.24%	-88.53%	+17.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.78%	-30.69%	+5.91%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-61.28%	-48.31%	-12.97%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-71.24%	-48.31%	-22.93%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-48.31%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-20.11%	-36.75%	+16.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.22%	-32.24%	+16.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.89%	16.77%	-7.88%

Volatility

VRT vs. UFPT - Volatility Comparison

Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) has a higher volatility of 16.60% compared to UFP Technologies, Inc. (UFPT) at 9.41%. This indicates that VRT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UFPT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VRT	UFPT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.60%	9.41%	+7.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	45.55%	30.26%	+15.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	58.11%	43.47%	+14.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	61.81%	44.22%	+17.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	54.61%	39.62%	+14.99%

Dividends

VRT vs. UFPT - Dividend Comparison

VRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, while UFPT has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
UFPT UFP Technologies, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co.	0.07%	0.11%	0.10%	0.05%	0.07%	0.04%	0.05%

Financials

VRT vs. UFPT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Vertiv Holdings Co. and UFP Technologies, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

VRT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported a gross profit of 999.70M and revenue of 2.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.7%.

UFPT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UFP Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 44.36M and revenue of 154.20M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.8%.

VRT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported an operating income of 440.10M and revenue of 2.65B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.6%.

UFPT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UFP Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of 23.37M and revenue of 154.20M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.2%.

VRT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported a net income of 390.10M and revenue of 2.65B, resulting in a net margin of 14.7%.

UFPT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UFP Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of 17.50M and revenue of 154.20M, resulting in a net margin of 11.4%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VRT and UFPT in my portfolio?

VRT and UFPT have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VRT or UFPT?

VRT has higher volatility (16.60%) compared to UFPT (9.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VRT dropped -71.24% vs UFPT's -88.53%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs -0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.