VRT vs. GPIQ
VRT (Vertiv Holdings Co.) is a stock, while GPIQ (Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF) is Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Goldman Sachs. Over the past year, VRT returned 160.87% vs 33.04% for GPIQ. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
VRT vs. GPIQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VRT achieves a 85.57% return, which is significantly higher than GPIQ's 14.88% return.
VRT
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- -11.59%
- YTD
- 85.57%
- 6M
- 61.97%
- 1Y
- 160.87%
- 3Y*
- 142.34%
- 5Y*
- 62.98%
- 10Y*
- —
GPIQ
- 1D
- 1.46%
- 1M
- 0.97%
- YTD
- 14.88%
- 6M
- 14.06%
- 1Y
- 33.04%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VRT vs. GPIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co. | 85.57% | 42.80% | 136.82% | 28.53% |
GPIQ Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF | 14.88% | 19.77% | 23.22% | 15.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between VRT and GPIQ is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2023 | 0.62 |
The correlation between VRT and GPIQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VRT vs. GPIQ — Risk / Return Rank
VRT
GPIQ
VRT vs. GPIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) and Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VRT | GPIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.43 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.53 | 3.49 | +3.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.20 | 15.21 | +2.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VRT | GPIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.79 | 2.36 | +0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.03 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.00 | 1.67 | -0.67 |
Drawdowns
VRT vs. GPIQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VRT drawdown since its inception was -71.24%, which is greater than GPIQ's maximum drawdown of -21.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VRT and GPIQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VRT | GPIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.24% | -21.06% | -50.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.78% | -9.51% | -15.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -61.28% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -71.24% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.11% | -3.08% | -17.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.22% | -2.27% | -13.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.89% | 2.18% | +6.71% |
Volatility
VRT vs. GPIQ - Volatility Comparison
Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) has a higher volatility of 16.60% compared to Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ) at 5.54%. This indicates that VRT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GPIQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VRT | GPIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.60% | 5.54% | +11.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.55% | 11.32% | +34.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.11% | 14.07% | +44.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 61.81% | 17.63% | +44.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.61% | 17.63% | +36.98% |
Dividends
VRT vs. GPIQ - Dividend Comparison
VRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, less than GPIQ's 9.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPIQ Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF | 9.60% | 9.81% | 9.18% | 1.74% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co. | 0.07% | 0.11% | 0.10% | 0.05% | 0.07% | 0.04% | 0.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VRT and GPIQ have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VRT has higher volatility (16.60%) compared to GPIQ (5.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VRT dropped -71.24% vs GPIQ's -21.06%.
VRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 2.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VRT and GPIQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer