PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
VRT vs. CVD.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

VRT vs. CVD.TO

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

VRT (Vertiv Holdings Co.) is a stock, while CVD.TO (iShares Convertible Bond Index ETF) is High Yield Bonds fund tracking the FTSE Canada Convertible Bond Index. Over the past 5 years, VRT returned 62.98%/yr vs 1.51%/yr for CVD.TO. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

VRT vs. CVD.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) and iShares Convertible Bond Index ETF (CVD.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VRT is traded in USD, while CVD.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the CVD.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VRT achieves a 85.57% return, which is significantly higher than CVD.TO's 1.49% return.

VRT

1D
0.02%
1M
-11.59%
YTD
85.57%
6M
61.97%
1Y
160.87%
3Y*
142.34%
5Y*
62.98%
10Y*
—

CVD.TO

1D
-0.55%
1M
-1.44%
YTD
1.49%
6M
0.09%
1Y
5.70%
3Y*
6.76%
5Y*
1.51%
10Y*
3.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VRT vs. CVD.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
VRT
Vertiv Holdings Co.		85.57%42.80%136.82%251.81%-45.25%33.80%69.36%12.55%1.03%
CVD.TO
iShares Convertible Bond Index ETF		1.49%12.22%3.88%6.17%-10.31%5.38%6.19%15.02%-8.37%

Correlation

The correlation between VRT and CVD.TO is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2018

0.09

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Vertiv Holdings Co.

iShares Convertible Bond Index ETF

Often compared with VRT:
VRT vs. GEVVRT vs. CLSVRT vs. ALABVRT vs. SPYVRT vs. VOOVRT vs. POWLVRT vs. APP
Often compared with CVD.TO:
CVD.TO vs. ZWC.TOCVD.TO vs. ICVTCVD.TO vs. XHY.TOCVD.TO vs. CGHY.TOCVD.TO vs. XHB.TOCVD.TO vs. XEQT.TOCVD.TO vs. XSB.TO

Return for Risk

VRT vs. CVD.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
VRT
VRT Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
VRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRT Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
VRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRT Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
CVD.TO
CVD.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
CVD.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CVD.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
CVD.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
CVD.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
CVD.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VRT vs. CVD.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) and iShares Convertible Bond Index ETF (CVD.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

VRTCVD.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.79
0.67

+2.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.30
0.95

+2.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.13

+0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.53

1.51

+5.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.20

3.12

+15.09

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VRT vs. CVD.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VRT Sharpe Ratio is 2.79, which is higher than the CVD.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VRT and CVD.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

VRTCVD.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.79

0.67

+2.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.03

0.13

+0.89

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.30

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.00

0.15

+0.86

Drawdowns

VRT vs. CVD.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VRT drawdown since its inception was -71.24%, which is greater than CVD.TO's maximum drawdown of -34.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VRT and CVD.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

VRTCVD.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.24%

-34.37%

-36.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.78%

-3.78%

-21.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-61.28%

-14.52%

-46.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-71.24%

-22.91%

-48.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-30.24%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.11%

-3.78%

-16.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.22%

-9.34%

-6.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.89%

1.83%

+7.06%

Volatility

VRT vs. CVD.TO - Volatility Comparison

Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) has a higher volatility of 16.60% compared to iShares Convertible Bond Index ETF (CVD.TO) at 1.39%. This indicates that VRT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CVD.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

VRTCVD.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.60%

1.39%

+15.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.55%

6.65%

+38.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

58.11%

8.61%

+49.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

61.81%

11.37%

+50.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

54.61%

11.79%

+42.82%

Dividends

VRT vs. CVD.TO - Dividend Comparison

VRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, less than CVD.TO's 4.94% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CVD.TO
iShares Convertible Bond Index ETF		4.94%4.91%5.14%5.33%5.05%4.61%4.48%4.52%4.97%4.65%4.51%4.94%
VRT
Vertiv Holdings Co.		0.07%0.11%0.10%0.05%0.07%0.04%0.05%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

VRT and CVD.TO have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VRT and CVD.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer