VRP vs. DIVO
VRP (Invesco Variable Rate Preferred ETF) and DIVO (Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VRP is a Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds fund tracking the Wells Fargo Hybrid and Preferred Securities Floating and Variable Rate Index, while DIVO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Amplify. VRP is passively managed, while DIVO is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, VRP returned 4.33%/yr vs 10.72%/yr for DIVO. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VRP charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for DIVO.
Performance
VRP vs. DIVO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VRP achieves a 1.98% return, which is significantly lower than DIVO's 5.28% return.
VRP
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- YTD
- 1.98%
- 6M
- 2.44%
- 1Y
- 6.69%
- 3Y*
- 9.63%
- 5Y*
- 4.33%
- 10Y*
- 5.21%
DIVO
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- 1.64%
- YTD
- 5.28%
- 6M
- 5.66%
- 1Y
- 17.72%
- 3Y*
- 15.15%
- 5Y*
- 10.72%
- 10Y*
- —
VRP vs. DIVO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VRP Invesco Variable Rate Preferred ETF | 1.98% | 7.34% | 11.10% | 10.35% | -9.00% | 4.20% | 5.11% | 18.84% | -6.62% | 9.26% |
DIVO Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF | 5.28% | 17.40% | 16.22% | 6.95% | -1.46% | 22.87% | 12.40% | 24.90% | -3.18% | 21.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between VRP and DIVO is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2016 | 0.41 |
VRP vs. DIVO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VRP
DIVO
Financial Services
Utilities
Energy
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Technology
-
Financial Services
VRP
DIVO
Utilities
VRP
DIVO
Energy
VRP
DIVO
Communication Services
VRP
DIVO
Real Estate
VRP
DIVO
-
Healthcare
VRP
DIVO
Industrials
VRP
DIVO
Consumer Cyclical
VRP
DIVO
Consumer Defensive
VRP
DIVO
Basic Materials
VRP
DIVO
Technology
VRP
-
DIVO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VRP vs. DIVO — Risk / Return Rank
VRP
DIVO
VRP vs. DIVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Variable Rate Preferred ETF (VRP) and Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VRP | DIVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.34 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.33 | 2.99 | -0.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.52 | 10.79 | +1.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VRP | DIVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.33 | 1.96 | +0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 | 0.90 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.84 | -0.46 |
Drawdowns
VRP vs. DIVO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VRP drawdown since its inception was -46.04%, which is greater than DIVO's maximum drawdown of -30.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VRP and DIVO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VRP | DIVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.04% | -30.04% | -16.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.89% | -5.95% | +3.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.26% | -12.12% | +7.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.76% | -13.72% | -0.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.04% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.25% | -1.27% | +1.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.31% | -2.61% | +0.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.54% | 1.65% | -1.11% |
Volatility
VRP vs. DIVO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Variable Rate Preferred ETF (VRP) is 0.63%, while Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO) has a volatility of 2.30%. This indicates that VRP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DIVO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VRP | DIVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.63% | 2.30% | -1.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.33% | 7.02% | -4.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.90% | 9.09% | -6.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.55% | 11.95% | -5.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.53% | 14.84% | -0.31% |
VRP vs. DIVO - Expense Ratio Comparison
VRP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than DIVO's 0.56% expense ratio.
Dividends
VRP vs. DIVO - Dividend Comparison
VRP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.31%, less than DIVO's 6.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIVO Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF | 6.43% | 6.44% | 4.70% | 4.67% | 4.76% | 4.79% | 4.91% | 8.16% | 5.27% | 3.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VRP Invesco Variable Rate Preferred ETF | 6.31% | 6.53% | 5.78% | 6.61% | 5.38% | 4.25% | 4.17% | 4.71% | 5.28% | 4.69% | 5.10% | 5.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VRP and DIVO have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DIVO has higher volatility (2.30%) compared to VRP (0.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VRP dropped -46.04% vs DIVO's -30.04%.
On 5-year performance, DIVO leads with 10.72% vs 4.33% for VRP. On fees, VRP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, VRP has been the lower-risk option at 0.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DIVO has performed better with a 10.72% return vs 4.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VRP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for DIVO.
DIVO has the higher dividend yield at 6.43%, compared with 6.31% for VRP.
VRP is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while DIVO is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for VRP and 0.56% for DIVO.
VRP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VRP and DIVO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer