PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VRP vs. BINC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VRP vs. BINC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Variable Rate Preferred ETF (VRP) and iShares Flexible Income Active ETF (BINC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VRP achieves a 1.98% return, which is significantly higher than BINC's 0.61% return.


VRP

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.08%
YTD
1.98%
6M
2.44%
1Y
6.69%
3Y*
9.63%
5Y*
4.33%
10Y*
5.21%

BINC

1D
-0.12%
1M
-0.31%
YTD
0.61%
6M
1.20%
1Y
5.51%
3Y*
6.84%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VRP vs. BINC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
VRP
Invesco Variable Rate Preferred ETF
1.98%7.34%11.10%9.82%
BINC
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF
0.61%7.57%5.76%7.12%

Correlation

The correlation between VRP and BINC is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2023

0.46

The correlation between VRP and BINC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

VRP vs. BINC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VRP
BINC

Financial Services

41.3%
0.1%

Utilities

17.0%

-

Energy

7.5%
0.0%

Communication Services

4.5%
-0.0%

Real Estate

2.8%
-0.0%

Healthcare

1.7%
-0.0%

Industrials

1.4%
0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

0.7%

-

Consumer Defensive

0.3%

-

Basic Materials

0.2%
0.0%

Technology

-

-

Financial Services

VRP
41.3%
BINC
0.1%

Utilities

VRP
17.0%
BINC

-

Energy

VRP
7.5%
BINC
0.0%

Communication Services

VRP
4.5%
BINC
-0.0%

Real Estate

VRP
2.8%
BINC
-0.0%

Healthcare

VRP
1.7%
BINC
-0.0%

Industrials

VRP
1.4%
BINC
0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

VRP
0.7%
BINC

-

Consumer Defensive

VRP
0.3%
BINC

-

Basic Materials

VRP
0.2%
BINC
0.0%

Technology

VRP

-

BINC

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VRP vs. BINC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VRP
VRP Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
VRP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRP Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
VRP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRP Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

BINC
BINC Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
BINC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BINC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
BINC Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
BINC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
BINC Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VRP vs. BINC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Variable Rate Preferred ETF (VRP) and iShares Flexible Income Active ETF (BINC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VRPBINCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.48

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.33

2.06

+0.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.52

8.08

+4.44

VRP vs. BINC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VRP Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is comparable to the BINC Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VRP and BINC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VRPBINCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.33

2.43

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

2.32

-1.94

Drawdowns

VRP vs. BINC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VRP drawdown since its inception was -46.04%, which is greater than BINC's maximum drawdown of -2.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VRP and BINC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VRPBINCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.04%

-2.69%

-43.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.89%

-2.69%

-0.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.26%

-2.69%

-1.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.25%

-0.77%

+0.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.31%

-0.36%

-1.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.54%

0.68%

-0.14%

Volatility

VRP vs. BINC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Variable Rate Preferred ETF (VRP) is 0.63%, while iShares Flexible Income Active ETF (BINC) has a volatility of 0.70%. This indicates that VRP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BINC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VRPBINCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.63%

0.70%

-0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.33%

1.85%

+0.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.90%

2.28%

+0.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.55%

3.00%

+3.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.53%

3.00%

+11.53%

VRP vs. BINC - Expense Ratio Comparison

VRP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BINC's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

VRP vs. BINC - Dividend Comparison

VRP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.31%, more than BINC's 5.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BINC
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF
5.88%5.86%6.14%3.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VRP
Invesco Variable Rate Preferred ETF
6.31%6.53%5.78%6.61%5.38%4.25%4.17%4.71%5.28%4.69%5.10%5.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


VRP and BINC have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BINC has higher volatility (0.70%) compared to VRP (0.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VRP dropped -46.04% vs BINC's -2.69%.

On 3-year performance, VRP leads with 9.63% vs 6.84% for BINC. On fees, BINC is cheaper at 0.40% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, VRP has performed better with a 9.63% return vs 6.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BINC is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for VRP.

VRP has the higher dividend yield at 6.31%, compared with 5.88% for BINC.

VRP is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while BINC is Multisector Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for VRP and 0.40% for BINC.

BINC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VRP and BINC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer