VRIG vs. FSTA
VRIG (Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF) and FSTA (Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VRIG is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Invesco, while FSTA is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Consumer Staples Index. VRIG is actively managed, while FSTA is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VRIG returned 4.44%/yr vs 6.56%/yr for FSTA. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VRIG charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for FSTA.
Performance
VRIG vs. FSTA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VRIG achieves a 1.87% return, which is significantly lower than FSTA's 7.29% return.
VRIG
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.39%
- YTD
- 1.87%
- 6M
- 2.24%
- 1Y
- 4.97%
- 3Y*
- 5.96%
- 5Y*
- 4.44%
- 10Y*
- —
FSTA
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- -2.09%
- YTD
- 7.29%
- 6M
- 7.43%
- 1Y
- 3.86%
- 3Y*
- 8.01%
- 5Y*
- 6.56%
- 10Y*
- 7.61%
VRIG vs. FSTA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VRIG Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF | 1.87% | 5.05% | 6.81% | 7.37% | 0.99% | 1.06% | 1.76% | 4.57% | 0.51% | 3.20% |
FSTA Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF | 7.29% | 1.82% | 13.31% | 2.29% | -1.72% | 17.44% | 10.96% | 26.84% | -8.49% | 12.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between VRIG and FSTA is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2016 | 0.07 |
The correlation between VRIG and FSTA shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.09 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VRIG vs. FSTA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VRIG
FSTA
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Technology
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
Communication Services
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
VRIG
FSTA
-
Consumer Cyclical
VRIG
FSTA
Basic Materials
VRIG
FSTA
Consumer Defensive
VRIG
FSTA
Technology
VRIG
FSTA
-
Real Estate
VRIG
FSTA
-
Utilities
VRIG
FSTA
-
Industrials
VRIG
FSTA
Communication Services
VRIG
-
FSTA
-
Energy
VRIG
-
FSTA
-
Healthcare
VRIG
-
FSTA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VRIG vs. FSTA — Risk / Return Rank
VRIG
FSTA
VRIG vs. FSTA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF (VRIG) and Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VRIG | FSTA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +9.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +23.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 5.29 | 1.06 | +4.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 62.49 | 0.42 | +62.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 318.26 | 0.85 | +317.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VRIG | FSTA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.08 | 0.31 | +9.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 3.46 | 0.50 | +2.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.91 | 0.62 | +0.29 |
Drawdowns
VRIG vs. FSTA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VRIG drawdown since its inception was -13.04%, smaller than the maximum FSTA drawdown of -25.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VRIG and FSTA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VRIG | FSTA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.04% | -25.13% | +12.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.08% | -9.29% | +9.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.78% | -11.76% | +10.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -2.28% | -16.58% | +14.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -25.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -7.26% | +7.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.27% | -3.56% | +3.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.02% | 4.57% | -4.55% |
Volatility
VRIG vs. FSTA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF (VRIG) is 0.11%, while Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA) has a volatility of 4.43%. This indicates that VRIG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSTA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VRIG | FSTA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.11% | 4.43% | -4.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.36% | 9.87% | -9.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50% | 12.44% | -11.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.29% | 13.13% | -11.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.80% | 14.57% | -10.77% |
VRIG vs. FSTA - Expense Ratio Comparison
VRIG has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than FSTA's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
VRIG vs. FSTA - Dividend Comparison
VRIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.79%, more than FSTA's 2.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSTA Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF | 2.22% | 2.34% | 2.25% | 2.66% | 2.26% | 2.15% | 2.47% | 2.46% | 3.01% | 2.42% | 2.53% | 2.86% |
VRIG Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF | 4.79% | 4.99% | 6.09% | 5.97% | 2.39% | 0.78% | 1.57% | 3.12% | 2.89% | 2.31% | 0.60% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VRIG and FSTA have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FSTA has higher volatility (4.43%) compared to VRIG (0.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VRIG dropped -13.04% vs FSTA's -25.13%.
On 5-year performance, FSTA leads with 6.56% vs 4.44% for VRIG. On fees, FSTA is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, VRIG has been the lower-risk option at 0.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FSTA has performed better with a 6.56% return vs 4.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FSTA is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for VRIG.
VRIG has the higher dividend yield at 4.79%, compared with 2.22% for FSTA.
VRIG is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while FSTA is Consumer Staples Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for VRIG and 0.08% for FSTA.
VRIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (10.08 vs 0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VRIG and FSTA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer