VPU vs. VFH
VPU (Vanguard Utilities ETF) and VFH (Vanguard Financials ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VPU is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Utilities 25/50 Index, while VFH is a Financials Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Financials 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VPU returned 8.85%/yr vs 12.59%/yr for VFH. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.09% expense ratio.
Performance
VPU vs. VFH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VPU achieves a 2.68% return, which is significantly higher than VFH's -4.26% return. Over the past 10 years, VPU has underperformed VFH with an annualized return of 8.85%, while VFH has yielded a comparatively higher 12.59% annualized return.
VPU
- 1D
- -1.87%
- 1M
- -2.65%
- YTD
- 2.68%
- 6M
- 3.11%
- 1Y
- 10.68%
- 3Y*
- 12.74%
- 5Y*
- 8.91%
- 10Y*
- 8.85%
VFH
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- 1.01%
- YTD
- -4.26%
- 6M
- -1.64%
- 1Y
- 4.15%
- 3Y*
- 18.86%
- 5Y*
- 8.65%
- 10Y*
- 12.59%
VPU vs. VFH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VPU Vanguard Utilities ETF | 2.68% | 16.46% | 23.04% | -7.45% | 1.06% | 17.40% | -0.74% | 24.89% | 4.38% | 12.44% |
VFH Vanguard Financials ETF | -4.26% | 14.91% | 30.44% | 14.17% | -12.31% | 35.22% | -1.96% | 31.57% | -13.52% | 19.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between VPU and VFH is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2004 | 0.43 |
Over the past year, the correlation between VPU and VFH has dropped to 0.19 - well below their long-term average of 0.43, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
VPU vs. VFH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VPU
VFH
Utilities
-
Energy
-
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
VPU
VFH
-
Energy
VPU
VFH
-
Industrials
VPU
VFH
Basic Materials
VPU
-
VFH
-
Communication Services
VPU
-
VFH
Consumer Cyclical
VPU
-
VFH
Consumer Defensive
VPU
-
VFH
-
Financial Services
VPU
-
VFH
Healthcare
VPU
-
VFH
Real Estate
VPU
-
VFH
Technology
VPU
-
VFH
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VPU vs. VFH — Risk / Return Rank
VPU
VFH
VPU vs. VFH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Utilities ETF (VPU) and Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VPU | VFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.06 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.20 | 0.28 | +0.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.66 | 0.74 | +1.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VPU | VFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 | 0.28 | +0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | 0.45 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | 0.56 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.24 | +0.29 |
Drawdowns
VPU vs. VFH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VPU drawdown since its inception was -46.31%, smaller than the maximum VFH drawdown of -78.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VPU and VFH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VPU | VFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.31% | -78.61% | +32.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.90% | -14.75% | +5.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.34% | -17.30% | -0.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.15% | -25.66% | +0.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.42% | -44.42% | +8.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.71% | -7.17% | -0.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.78% | -18.53% | +10.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.02% | 5.60% | -1.58% |
Volatility
VPU vs. VFH - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Utilities ETF (VPU) has a higher volatility of 5.56% compared to Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH) at 4.28%. This indicates that VPU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VFH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VPU | VFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.56% | 4.28% | +1.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.53% | 11.34% | +0.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.38% | 14.98% | -0.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.07% | 19.34% | -2.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.14% | 22.56% | -3.42% |
VPU vs. VFH - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both VPU and VFH have an expense ratio of 0.09%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VPU vs. VFH - Dividend Comparison
VPU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.70%, more than VFH's 1.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VFH Vanguard Financials ETF | 1.53% | 1.55% | 1.75% | 2.08% | 2.31% | 1.87% | 2.21% | 2.17% | 2.30% | 1.53% | 1.63% | 2.00% |
VPU Vanguard Utilities ETF | 2.70% | 2.73% | 3.02% | 3.49% | 2.98% | 2.70% | 3.17% | 2.83% | 3.23% | 3.18% | 3.19% | 3.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VPU and VFH have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VPU has higher volatility (5.56%) compared to VFH (4.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VPU dropped -46.31% vs VFH's -78.61%.
On 10-year performance, VFH leads with 12.59% vs 8.85% for VPU. Both ETFs have the same 0.09% expense ratio. On volatility, VFH has been the lower-risk option at 4.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VFH has performed better with a 12.59% return vs 8.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VPU and VFH have the same expense ratio: 0.09% per year.
VPU has the higher dividend yield at 2.70%, compared with 1.53% for VFH.
VPU is categorized as Utilities Equities, while VFH is Financials Equities. VPU tracks MSCI US Investable Market Utilities 25/50 Index, while VFH tracks MSCI US Investable Market Financials 25/50 Index.
VPU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.75 vs 0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VPU and VFH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer