PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VPU vs. VAW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VPU vs. VAW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Utilities ETF (VPU) and Vanguard Materials ETF (VAW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VPU achieves a 2.68% return, which is significantly lower than VAW's 9.07% return. Over the past 10 years, VPU has underperformed VAW with an annualized return of 8.85%, while VAW has yielded a comparatively higher 9.87% annualized return.


VPU

1D
-1.87%
1M
-2.65%
YTD
2.68%
6M
3.11%
1Y
10.68%
3Y*
12.74%
5Y*
8.91%
10Y*
8.85%

VAW

1D
-1.01%
1M
-3.30%
YTD
9.07%
6M
14.24%
1Y
17.86%
3Y*
10.82%
5Y*
5.32%
10Y*
9.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VPU vs. VAW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VPU
Vanguard Utilities ETF
2.68%16.46%23.04%-7.45%1.06%17.40%-0.74%24.89%4.38%12.44%
VAW
Vanguard Materials ETF
9.07%12.30%0.48%13.67%-11.80%27.43%19.44%23.53%-17.49%23.76%

Correlation

The correlation between VPU and VAW is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2004

0.46

The correlation between VPU and VAW shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.46 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VPU vs. VAW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VPU
VAW

Utilities

99.3%

-

Energy

0.5%
0.5%

Industrials

0.2%
1.0%

Basic Materials

-

90.2%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

8.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

0.0%

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

0.5%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

0.1%

Utilities

VPU
99.3%
VAW

-

Energy

VPU
0.5%
VAW
0.5%

Industrials

VPU
0.2%
VAW
1.0%

Basic Materials

VPU

-

VAW
90.2%

Communication Services

VPU

-

VAW

-

Consumer Cyclical

VPU

-

VAW
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

VPU

-

VAW
0.0%

Financial Services

VPU

-

VAW

-

Healthcare

VPU

-

VAW
0.5%

Real Estate

VPU

-

VAW

-

Technology

VPU

-

VAW
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VPU vs. VAW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VPU
VPU Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
VPU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VPU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
VPU Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
VPU Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
VPU Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

VAW
VAW Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
VAW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VAW Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
VAW Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
VAW Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
VAW Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VPU vs. VAW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Utilities ETF (VPU) and Vanguard Materials ETF (VAW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VPUVAWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.18

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.20

1.34

-0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.66

4.32

-1.66

VPU vs. VAW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VPU Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is comparable to the VAW Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VPU and VAW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VPUVAWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

1.01

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.27

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

0.47

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.39

+0.15

Drawdowns

VPU vs. VAW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VPU drawdown since its inception was -46.31%, smaller than the maximum VAW drawdown of -62.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VPU and VAW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VPUVAWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.31%

-62.17%

+15.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.90%

-13.42%

+4.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.34%

-23.21%

+5.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.15%

-25.50%

+0.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.42%

-41.13%

+4.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.71%

-7.27%

-0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.78%

-9.63%

+1.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.02%

4.14%

-0.12%

Volatility

VPU vs. VAW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Utilities ETF (VPU) is 5.56%, while Vanguard Materials ETF (VAW) has a volatility of 5.94%. This indicates that VPU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VAW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VPUVAWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.56%

5.94%

-0.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.53%

14.18%

-2.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.38%

17.88%

-3.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.07%

19.65%

-2.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.14%

21.22%

-2.08%

VPU vs. VAW - Expense Ratio Comparison

VPU has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than VAW's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VPU vs. VAW - Dividend Comparison

VPU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.70%, more than VAW's 1.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VAW
Vanguard Materials ETF
1.41%1.55%1.70%1.72%1.98%1.44%1.67%1.94%2.03%1.63%1.67%2.30%
VPU
Vanguard Utilities ETF
2.70%2.73%3.02%3.49%2.98%2.70%3.17%2.83%3.23%3.18%3.19%3.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


VPU and VAW have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VAW has higher volatility (5.94%) compared to VPU (5.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VPU dropped -46.31% vs VAW's -62.17%.

On 10-year performance, VAW leads with 9.87% vs 8.85% for VPU. On fees, VPU is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, VPU has been the lower-risk option at 5.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VAW has performed better with a 9.87% return vs 8.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VPU is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for VAW.

VPU has the higher dividend yield at 2.70%, compared with 1.41% for VAW.

VPU is categorized as Utilities Equities, while VAW is Materials. VPU tracks MSCI US Investable Market Utilities 25/50 Index, while VAW tracks MSCI US Investable Market Materials 25/50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VPU and 0.10% for VAW.

VAW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.01 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VPU and VAW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer