PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VOOG vs. NLR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VOOG vs. NLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG) and VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VOOG achieves a 10.10% return, which is significantly higher than NLR's -0.79% return. Over the past 10 years, VOOG has outperformed NLR with an annualized return of 17.80%, while NLR has yielded a comparatively lower 12.72% annualized return.


VOOG

1D
0.65%
1M
-0.20%
YTD
10.10%
6M
9.55%
1Y
29.06%
3Y*
26.66%
5Y*
15.20%
10Y*
17.80%

NLR

1D
0.91%
1M
-12.54%
YTD
-0.79%
6M
-6.08%
1Y
26.72%
3Y*
31.16%
5Y*
20.16%
10Y*
12.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VOOG vs. NLR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VOOG
Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF
10.10%22.11%35.89%29.96%-29.48%31.95%33.35%30.93%-0.21%27.19%
NLR
VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF
-0.79%56.50%14.26%36.67%2.29%13.63%3.49%0.20%4.94%8.25%

Correlation

The correlation between VOOG and NLR is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010

0.54

The correlation between VOOG and NLR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

VOOG vs. NLR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VOOG
NLR

Technology

49.4%
1.5%

Communication Services

18.0%

-

Consumer Cyclical

9.4%

-

Financial Services

8.8%

-

Industrials

6.2%
15.1%

Healthcare

5.8%

-

Consumer Defensive

1.0%

-

Real Estate

0.6%

-

Utilities

0.4%
37.4%

Basic Materials

0.4%

-

Energy

0.1%
46.0%

Technology

VOOG
49.4%
NLR
1.5%

Communication Services

VOOG
18.0%
NLR

-

Consumer Cyclical

VOOG
9.4%
NLR

-

Financial Services

VOOG
8.8%
NLR

-

Industrials

VOOG
6.2%
NLR
15.1%

Healthcare

VOOG
5.8%
NLR

-

Consumer Defensive

VOOG
1.0%
NLR

-

Real Estate

VOOG
0.6%
NLR

-

Utilities

VOOG
0.4%
NLR
37.4%

Basic Materials

VOOG
0.4%
NLR

-

Energy

VOOG
0.1%
NLR
46.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VOOG vs. NLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VOOG
VOOG Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
VOOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOOG Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
VOOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOOG Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

NLR
NLR Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
NLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
NLR Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
NLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
NLR Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VOOG vs. NLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG) and VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VOOGNLRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.13

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.13

1.04

+1.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.74

2.08

+6.66

VOOG vs. NLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VOOG Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is higher than the NLR Sharpe Ratio of 0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VOOG and NLR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VOOGNLRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.79

0.63

+1.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

0.69

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

0.53

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.89

0.16

+0.73

Drawdowns

VOOG vs. NLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOOG drawdown since its inception was -32.73%, smaller than the maximum NLR drawdown of -65.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOOG and NLR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VOOGNLRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.73%

-65.05%

+32.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.71%

-25.80%

+12.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.18%

-30.48%

+8.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.73%

-30.48%

-2.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.73%

-34.35%

+1.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.28%

-25.03%

+20.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.97%

-35.71%

+30.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.33%

12.87%

-9.54%

Volatility

VOOG vs. NLR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG) is 5.61%, while VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) has a volatility of 13.36%. This indicates that VOOG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VOOGNLRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.61%

13.36%

-7.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.04%

33.24%

-20.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.31%

42.96%

-26.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.25%

29.43%

-8.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.77%

24.14%

-3.37%

VOOG vs. NLR - Expense Ratio Comparison

VOOG has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than NLR's 0.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

VOOG vs. NLR - Dividend Comparison

VOOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, less than NLR's 2.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NLR
VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF
2.57%2.55%0.76%4.54%2.02%1.99%2.23%2.21%3.91%4.86%3.62%3.30%
VOOG
Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF
0.45%0.49%0.49%1.12%0.93%0.53%0.88%1.26%1.34%1.32%1.47%1.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


VOOG and NLR have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NLR has higher volatility (13.36%) compared to VOOG (5.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOOG dropped -32.73% vs NLR's -65.05%.

On 10-year performance, VOOG leads with 17.80% vs 12.72% for NLR. On fees, VOOG is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, VOOG has been the lower-risk option at 5.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOOG has performed better with a 17.80% return vs 12.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOOG is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for NLR.

NLR has the higher dividend yield at 2.57%, compared with 0.45% for VOOG.

VOOG is categorized as S&P 500, while NLR is Alternative Energy Equities. VOOG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index, while NLR tracks MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VOOG and 0.56% for NLR.

VOOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VOOG and NLR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer