VOOG vs. FLIN
VOOG (Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF) and FLIN (Franklin FTSE India ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VOOG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth Index, while FLIN is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the FTSE India RIC Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VOOG returned 15.20%/yr vs 3.56%/yr for FLIN. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VOOG charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for FLIN.
Performance
VOOG vs. FLIN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VOOG achieves a 10.10% return, which is significantly higher than FLIN's -12.18% return.
VOOG
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- -0.20%
- YTD
- 10.10%
- 6M
- 9.55%
- 1Y
- 29.06%
- 3Y*
- 26.66%
- 5Y*
- 15.20%
- 10Y*
- 17.80%
FLIN
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -4.99%
- YTD
- -12.18%
- 6M
- -10.48%
- 1Y
- -13.37%
- 3Y*
- 5.55%
- 5Y*
- 3.56%
- 10Y*
- —
VOOG vs. FLIN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VOOG Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF | 10.10% | 22.11% | 35.89% | 29.96% | -29.48% | 31.95% | 33.35% | 30.93% | 1.96% |
FLIN Franklin FTSE India ETF | -12.18% | 2.40% | 10.33% | 20.58% | -7.96% | 24.96% | 14.50% | 4.77% | -6.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between VOOG and FLIN is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2018 | 0.46 |
VOOG vs. FLIN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VOOG
FLIN
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Technology
VOOG
FLIN
Communication Services
VOOG
FLIN
Consumer Cyclical
VOOG
FLIN
Financial Services
VOOG
FLIN
Industrials
VOOG
FLIN
Healthcare
VOOG
FLIN
Consumer Defensive
VOOG
FLIN
Real Estate
VOOG
FLIN
Utilities
VOOG
FLIN
Basic Materials
VOOG
FLIN
Energy
VOOG
FLIN
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VOOG vs. FLIN — Risk / Return Rank
VOOG
FLIN
VOOG vs. FLIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG) and Franklin FTSE India ETF (FLIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VOOG | FLIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 0.86 | +0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.13 | -0.71 | +2.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.74 | -1.73 | +10.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VOOG | FLIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.79 | -0.90 | +2.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | 0.23 | +0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.89 | 0.26 | +0.63 |
Drawdowns
VOOG vs. FLIN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VOOG drawdown since its inception was -32.73%, smaller than the maximum FLIN drawdown of -41.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOOG and FLIN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VOOG | FLIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.73% | -41.90% | +9.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.71% | -18.79% | +5.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.18% | -22.85% | +0.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.73% | -22.85% | -9.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.73% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.28% | -19.15% | +14.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.97% | -8.02% | +3.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.33% | 7.73% | -4.40% |
Volatility
VOOG vs. FLIN - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG) has a higher volatility of 5.61% compared to Franklin FTSE India ETF (FLIN) at 5.06%. This indicates that VOOG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VOOG | FLIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.61% | 5.06% | +0.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.04% | 12.90% | +0.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.31% | 14.98% | +1.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.25% | 15.76% | +5.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.77% | 20.44% | +0.33% |
VOOG vs. FLIN - Expense Ratio Comparison
VOOG has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than FLIN's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VOOG vs. FLIN - Dividend Comparison
VOOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, less than FLIN's 0.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLIN Franklin FTSE India ETF | 0.64% | 0.56% | 1.58% | 0.73% | 0.73% | 2.26% | 0.68% | 0.90% | 0.92% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VOOG Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF | 0.45% | 0.49% | 0.49% | 1.12% | 0.93% | 0.53% | 0.88% | 1.26% | 1.34% | 1.32% | 1.47% | 1.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VOOG and FLIN have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VOOG has higher volatility (5.61%) compared to FLIN (5.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOOG dropped -32.73% vs FLIN's -41.90%.
On 5-year performance, VOOG leads with 15.20% vs 3.56% for FLIN. On fees, VOOG is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, FLIN has been the lower-risk option at 5.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VOOG has performed better with a 15.20% return vs 3.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOOG is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for FLIN.
FLIN has the higher dividend yield at 0.64%, compared with 0.45% for VOOG.
VOOG is categorized as S&P 500, while FLIN is Asia Pacific Equities. VOOG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index, while FLIN tracks FTSE India RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VOOG and 0.19% for FLIN.
VOOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs -0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VOOG and FLIN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer