VOO vs. XHYD
VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) and XHYD (BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclicals Sector ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while XHYD is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the ICE Diversified US Cash Pay High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclical. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, VOO returned 21.45%/yr vs 7.51%/yr for XHYD. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VOO charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XHYD.
Performance
VOO vs. XHYD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VOO achieves a 8.72% return, which is significantly higher than XHYD's 0.44% return.
VOO
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 0.24%
- YTD
- 8.72%
- 6M
- 8.77%
- 1Y
- 24.91%
- 3Y*
- 21.45%
- 5Y*
- 13.49%
- 10Y*
- 15.35%
XHYD
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.75%
- YTD
- 0.44%
- 6M
- 0.97%
- 1Y
- 5.22%
- 3Y*
- 7.51%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VOO vs. XHYD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 8.72% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -11.11% |
XHYD BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclicals Sector ETF | 0.44% | 8.33% | 6.29% | 11.75% | -5.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between VOO and XHYD is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2022 | 0.62 |
Over the past year, the correlation between VOO and XHYD has dropped to 0.41 - well below their long-term average of 0.62, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
VOO vs. XHYD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VOO
XHYD
Technology
-
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
-
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Technology
VOO
XHYD
-
Financial Services
VOO
XHYD
Communication Services
VOO
XHYD
-
Consumer Cyclical
VOO
XHYD
Healthcare
VOO
XHYD
-
Industrials
VOO
XHYD
Consumer Defensive
VOO
XHYD
Energy
VOO
XHYD
-
Utilities
VOO
XHYD
Real Estate
VOO
XHYD
-
Basic Materials
VOO
XHYD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VOO vs. XHYD — Risk / Return Rank
VOO
XHYD
VOO vs. XHYD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclicals Sector ETF (XHYD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VOO | XHYD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.32 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.81 | 2.36 | +0.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.97 | 10.53 | +2.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VOO | XHYD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.08 | 1.55 | +0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.85 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.88 | 0.67 | +0.21 |
Drawdowns
VOO vs. XHYD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VOO drawdown since its inception was -33.99%, which is greater than XHYD's maximum drawdown of -11.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOO and XHYD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VOO | XHYD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.99% | -11.02% | -22.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.90% | -2.49% | -6.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.69% | -3.70% | -14.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.52% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.99% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.66% | -1.08% | -1.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.69% | -2.04% | -1.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.92% | 0.56% | +1.36% |
Volatility
VOO vs. XHYD - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a higher volatility of 3.73% compared to BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclicals Sector ETF (XHYD) at 1.83%. This indicates that VOO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XHYD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VOO | XHYD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.73% | 1.83% | +1.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.31% | 3.28% | +6.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.08% | 3.79% | +8.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.85% | 7.15% | +9.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.03% | 7.15% | +10.88% |
VOO vs. XHYD - Expense Ratio Comparison
VOO has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than XHYD's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
VOO vs. XHYD - Dividend Comparison
VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, while XHYD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.05% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
XHYD BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclicals Sector ETF | 5.31% | 5.83% | 6.32% | 5.80% | 5.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VOO and XHYD have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VOO has higher volatility (3.73%) compared to XHYD (1.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOO dropped -33.99% vs XHYD's -11.02%.
On 3-year performance, VOO leads with 21.45% vs 7.51% for XHYD. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, XHYD has been the lower-risk option at 1.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, VOO has performed better with a 21.45% return vs 7.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XHYD.
XHYD has the higher dividend yield at 5.31%, compared with 1.05% for VOO.
VOO is categorized as S&P 500, while XHYD is High Yield Bonds. VOO tracks S&P 500 Index, while XHYD tracks ICE Diversified US Cash Pay High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclical. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and BondBloxx. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VOO and 0.35% for XHYD.
VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VOO and XHYD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer