PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VOO vs. TMUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VOO vs. TMUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VOO achieves a 8.72% return, which is significantly higher than TMUS's -11.22% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VOO having a 15.35% annualized return and TMUS not far ahead at 16.10%.


VOO

1D
0.25%
1M
0.24%
YTD
8.72%
6M
8.77%
1Y
24.91%
3Y*
21.45%
5Y*
13.49%
10Y*
15.35%

TMUS

1D
0.19%
1M
-7.35%
YTD
-11.22%
6M
-11.83%
1Y
-26.06%
3Y*
12.41%
5Y*
4.85%
10Y*
16.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VOO vs. TMUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
8.72%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%
TMUS
T-Mobile US, Inc.
-11.22%-6.58%39.70%15.02%20.71%-13.99%71.96%23.28%0.16%10.43%

Correlation

The correlation between VOO and TMUS is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010

0.42

The correlation between VOO and TMUS shifts across timeframes, from -0.19 (1 year) to 0.42 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VOO vs. TMUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

TMUS
TMUS Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
TMUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMUS Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
TMUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMUS Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VOO vs. TMUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VOOTMUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

0.83

+0.55

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.81

-0.86

+3.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.97

-1.49

+14.46

VOO vs. TMUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VOO Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is higher than the TMUS Sharpe Ratio of -1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VOO and TMUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VOOTMUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.08

-1.05

+3.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

0.20

+0.60

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

0.62

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.88

0.20

+0.68

Drawdowns

VOO vs. TMUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOO drawdown since its inception was -33.99%, smaller than the maximum TMUS drawdown of -86.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOO and TMUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VOOTMUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.99%

-86.29%

+52.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.90%

-30.37%

+21.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.69%

-33.65%

+14.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.52%

-33.65%

+9.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

-33.65%

-0.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.66%

-33.12%

+30.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.69%

-25.96%

+22.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

17.64%

-15.72%

Volatility

VOO vs. TMUS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is 3.73%, while T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS) has a volatility of 6.91%. This indicates that VOO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TMUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VOOTMUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.73%

6.91%

-3.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.31%

19.14%

-9.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.08%

25.04%

-12.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.85%

23.86%

-7.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.03%

26.08%

-8.05%

Dividends

VOO vs. TMUS - Dividend Comparison

VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, less than TMUS's 2.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TMUS
T-Mobile US, Inc.
2.21%1.80%1.28%0.41%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.05%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


VOO and TMUS have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TMUS has higher volatility (6.91%) compared to VOO (3.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOO dropped -33.99% vs TMUS's -86.29%.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs -1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VOO and TMUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer